Rusty Dennis (Cher) smiles as Gar (Sam Elliott) stands beside her at a playground
Film review

Mask

1985 · Directed by Peter Bogdanovich · 2h 00m

In a sentenceCher makes maternal concern sound like something nobody sensible would argue with

Sixteen-year-old Rocky Dennis (Eric Stoltz) wants to be like everyone else, while the people around him have told him he never can be. His first day at school puts that wish into practice, bringing the question of acceptance into an ordinary part of growing up. His mother, Rusty Dennis (Cher), is central to his life, with Gar (Sam Elliott) also part of the world around them. Rocky responds to being told he cannot be ordinary by deciding to be better, setting himself a demanding standard before he has finished being a schoolboy.

Fi1m review

Mask is a warm, affecting drama carried by Cher and Eric Stoltz, who make its mother and son worth spending time with. Peter Bogdanovich sometimes presses for tears after the performances have already earned them.

Mask is a good, humane drama, strongest when it allows its people to be more interesting than its lesson. Peter Bogdanovich has a boy who wants to belong and a mother whose importance to him cannot be reduced to encouragement. At sixteen, Rocky Dennis has already been told he cannot be like everyone else; deciding to be better sounds bracing until we consider what that asks of him. The film takes that pressure seriously. We recommend it, with some patience for its occasional insistence on being moving.

Eric Stoltz gives Rocky Dennis enough life that we do not spend the film waiting for him to demonstrate a virtue. His performance has a welcome lightness, keeping our sympathy from becoming the only possible response to him. We were moved by his first day at school, because Eric Stoltz makes the wish to be accepted feel so ordinary and the effort so unfair. The scene works without requiring us to congratulate ourselves for caring about him.

Cher is just as important, and the relationship between Rusty Dennis and her son is the reason to stay. She makes motherhood feel like work being done by an individual, with a temperament of her own. She can be affectionate without becoming easy company, and the relationship is more convincing for it. Anna Hamilton Phelan’s writing is most persuasive when it allows both people feelings that do not conveniently match. The affection matters because neither performance suggests that loving the other person is simple.

László Kovács’s cinematography is well judged in its attention to the actors. We never feel the images competing with Cher or Eric Stoltz, which is the right balance for a drama whose interest rests so heavily on them. That restraint suits Peter Bogdanovich’s handling of the central relationship. When these two have our attention, there is little need for the film to keep pointing out the importance of what they are doing.

Barbara Ford’s editing gives the relationship sufficient time to become convincing. The pacing is patient, though at 120 minutes the film has room to make the same emotional appeal more often than it needs to. Dennis Ricotta’s music is less helpful when it adds further encouragement to feel. The actors have already done enough. We would happily lose some of that encouragement and spend the time simply watching them.

The weakness is familiar from dramas about young people being treated as different: the wish to defend a character can leave too little room for them to be unremarkable. Mask occasionally seems anxious that we might miss its decency. Its sentimentality is not ruinous, but it does make some of the emotion feel prepared for us. Peter Bogdanovich is better when he trusts the interest of the mother and son. Their relationship has enough difficulty and affection to hold our attention without additional persuasion.

This is worth an evening for the two central performances and for the care with which the film takes Rocky Dennis seriously. Cher and Eric Stoltz make the demands of loving someone feel particular to these people. We would not choose it for an unsentimental night. Go for the mother and son, and allow for the occasional nudge.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
RogerEbert.com
8 May 1985 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

Ebert’s review is positive about the film’s humane approach. It singles out the performances, particularly Cher’s, for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

The review calls the film an enormously moving and life-affirming experience. It especially praises Cher’s performance and the nuanced portrayal of Rocky and his mother.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1985 · Variety Staff
80*

The review is warmly positive, emphasizing the film’s vitality and humane portrayal of Rocky’s life. It singles out Eric Stoltz’s life-affirming performance and the vividness of the world around him.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 March 1985 · Sheila Benson
78*

Benson finds the film moving and emotionally persuasive, despite occasional sentimentality. She especially praises Eric Stoltz and Cher for their devoted, fully realized performances as son and mother.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· RR
64*

The available text does not establish the review’s overall verdict. It calls the scenes dealing with Rocky the most effective, but the description is cut off.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Mask worth watching?
Mask is worth watching for Cher and Eric Stoltz’s convincing mother-and-son relationship, and we score it 81 out of 100. We recommend it to anyone drawn to warm, character-led drama, with a caveat: the performances earn our sympathy before the music and direction finish asking for it.
How long is Mask, and what is it rated?
Mask runs 2h 00m. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Mask in Singapore?
Mask is not on any streaming or rental service in Singapore at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Mask, and is it suitable for children?
Mask has a UK 12 certificate, making it a choice for viewers aged 12 and over rather than younger children. Its treatment of a teenager’s struggle for acceptance and his demanding relationship with his mother gives it emotional weight; we recommend it as an affecting drama, without treating that certificate as a guarantee against upsetting material.
How does Mask compare to The Elephant Man?
Mask is the warmer choice beside The Elephant Man, which takes a harsher, more unsettling view of how people look at an outsider. We favour Mask for its particular attention to mother and son, and The Elephant Man for viewers seeking a more troubling drama; both make their central characters matter beyond other people’s pity.
What should I watch after Mask?
After Mask, try The Elephant Man (1980, Fi1m 84): An outsider’s dignity, with a harsher view of the people doing the looking. Then My Life as a Courgette (2016, Fi1m 84): Young outsiders find company in an animation that allows sorrow without becoming solemn.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1986

Won
Best Makeup and Hairstyling

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Taste of Honey (1961) · not reviewed yetAnother mother and child given room to be difficult, funny and loving.

  2. The Elephant Man (1980, Fi1m 84)An outsider’s dignity, with a harsher view of the people doing the looking.

  3. The Kid with a Bike (2011) · not reviewed yetA young person’s need for affection, handled without easy reassurance.

  4. The Way He Looks (2014) · not reviewed yetTeenage independence and attraction take priority over other people’s assumptions about disability.

  5. My Life as a Courgette (2016, Fi1m 84)Young outsiders find company in an animation that allows sorrow without becoming solemn.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever