Film review

Monsters

2010 · Directed by Gareth Edwards · 1h 34m · MPA R

In a sentenceA road romance that refuses to hurry just because there are giant aliens about

DramaThrillerScience Fiction

Six years after alien creatures arrive, Andrew Kaulder (Scoot McNairy) and Samantha Wynden (Whitney Able) are travelling through the US–Mexico border region. Giant, squidlike beings have become part of the surroundings, and everyday life continues in their presence. A Ticket Seller (Mario Zuniga Benavides) is among the people the pair encounter along the way. Their immediate concern is continuing through unfamiliar territory, with the possibility of danger complicating their journey. As they spend time together, a hesitant attraction develops alongside the practical business of travelling through a place where the aliens are already residents.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Gareth Edwards makes alien creatures feel at home in a patient, absorbing road romance. The border politics need more thought, and the pace sometimes slackens, but Monsters earns its quiet approach to science fiction.

Gareth Edwards’s Monsters is good science fiction for an evening when we would rather spend time in an unfamiliar place than watch it being demolished. It follows Andrew Kaulder (Scoot McNairy) and Samantha Wynden (Whitney Able), with a road journey and a tentative romance taking precedence over creature attacks. The title might suggest a more aggressive film, but the patience mostly pays off. The director makes the aliens seem settled into a landscape where people still have lives to get on with.

As cinematographer and production designer, Gareth Edwards makes the surroundings worth our attention. The location photography has a looseness that makes the journey feel discovered, while the production design gives the creatures a place among ordinary human surroundings. The effects are convincing because they belong in these images, with little sense that the scenery has been arranged merely to display them. There is pleasure in looking around the frame, even when the story offers little immediate reason to hurry.

Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able are good at keeping the relationship from seeming like the sole purpose of the trip. They allow for an awkwardness that suits two people whose closeness is still uncertain, and neither performance demands that we find them irresistible. The trouble comes when Gareth Edwards’s writing asks their conversation to carry too much of the film. Some of it is so undemonstrative that the characters become harder to distinguish than they should be.

We felt an unexpected shiver when the giant, squidlike creatures appeared. Their infrequent appearances give us time to register their strangeness instead of simply waiting for the next attack, and the effects hold up to that attention. Jon Hopkins’s music deepens the unease without treating every quiet stretch as preparation for an attack. The creatures are the clearest reason to see the film, even though the director is right to keep them out of much of it.

Colin Goudie’s editing is sympathetic to the travelling and the developing attachment, giving both more room than a succession of shocks would allow. That is often welcome, although there are stretches when the film seems to be waiting for the relationship to acquire more weight. At 94 minutes it is short, but it does not always feel brisk. We would not ask for more attacks; a little more precision in the exchanges between the two travellers would do.

The US–Mexico border gives the story a political meaning that the film hardly needs to underline. Alien creatures, immigration anxiety and the question of who gets treated as an intruder make a fairly easy connection, and the film does too little to complicate it. The people who live in this region deserve more attention than the travelling couple’s story allows them. Because the setting feels persuasively inhabited, we notice how little we learn about those inhabitants.

Within science fiction, its willingness to leave the creatures at the edge of the human story is refreshing, though quietness alone would not be enough. The images and the hesitant affection supply enough interest to forgive the occasional drift. We recommend it to anyone happy to let a journey take precedence over an explanation. If tonight calls for a sustained siege, choose something else.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

75
Positive
16
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Monsters as a quiet science-fiction road film whose romance matters more than its creatures. Praise centres on Edwards’ resourceful effects, atmospheric location shooting and the convincing presence of the fantastic in ordinary surroundings. Many reviews find the leads’ understated performances and chemistry enough to sustain the journey. The sparing monster appearances are generally welcomed, with human encounters taking precedence over action.

The spread is wide, however, and the relationship that engages most critics leaves others cold. Reservations concern the subdued pacing, limited sense of danger and an immigration allegory some find too obvious. The Los Angeles Times admires the dystopian imagery but finds the characters empty and the political ideas underdeveloped. Slant Magazine dissents more sharply, rejecting both the leads’ chemistry and the treatment of poverty and immigration; the disagreement extends beyond expectations of how much a monster film should show its monsters.

Empire
29 October 2010 · Dan Jolin
90*

Praises the low-budget sci-fi road movie as an amazing achievement that matches top indies in performances and character work while delivering blockbuster-level effects, thanks to the director's one-man VFX and filmmaking ingenuity.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
15 June 2010 · festival review
90*

The review calls it an impressively assured debut that succeeds across performances, story, effects and locations, describing it as an intelligent, absorbing and moving sci-fi romance rather than a horror flick.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
2 December 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Edwards delivers a thrilling postmodern sci-fi film with a downbeat approach to the monsters and a hugely involving love story. The director channels classic influences while offering a Swiftian satire on immigration fears and a superb final gesture.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
2 December 2010 · ***
90*

Edwards multitasks impressively on a tiny budget to create a visually and sonically enviable film. It is a gorgeous and unsettling road movie about an almost-romance with an ending that sends shivers down the spine.

Read the full review →
Total Film
2 December 2010 · Matt Glasby
90*

Hails it as the first home-made sci-fi blockbuster, crediting Edwards' innovative all-in-one production with creating a realistic, empathetic world and awesome monster reveals that promise even greater things ahead.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

The critic commends the enterprising debut for its fresh mix of sci-fi, road movie and romance, noting the convincing low-budget effects and strong human dimension centered on the leads' chemistry.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Saturn Awards, 2010

Won
Best International Film

Sitges Film Festival best special effects award, 2010

Won
Sitges Film Festival best special effects award

If you liked this, try…

Stalker poster86

Stalker

1979 · Another uncertain journey through altered territory, with more patience and fewer reassurances.

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · For a creature feature that gives family arguments as much attention as danger.

The Brother from Another Planet poster

The Brother from Another Planet

1984 · Alien arrival becomes a way to notice everyday kindness and hostility.

Midnight Special poster

Midnight Special

2016 · A guarded road journey whose human attachments matter more than its explanations.

The Vast of Night poster

The Vast of Night

2019 · Patient science fiction that builds its unease from voices, distance and waiting.