Film review

One Night Only

2026 · Directed by Will Gluck · 1h 43m · MPA R

In a sentenceNew York gets twelve hours of legal premarital sex and still spends most of them being coy

RomanceComedy

Allie (Monica Barbaro) and Owen (Callum Turner) are two New Yorkers looking for connection during an annual twelve-hour exemption from a ban on premarital sex. For this one night, the usual restriction is suspended and their search has a deadline. Their attempts to find someone unfold across the city, amid the complications of pursuing romance when the clock is running. Will Gluck directs this romantic comedy, written by Travis Braun. The cast also includes Maya Hawke as Malika, King Princess as Jacinta, Molly Ringwald as Linda and LeVar Burton as Rick.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Monica Barbaro and Callum Turner make an appealing pair, but this timid romantic comedy cannot make its annual sex exemption funny enough to forget how grim it is. The chemistry deserves a less muddled film.

One Night Only has an appealing couple and a premise it has not thought through. Will Gluck directs a romantic comedy about an annual twelve-hour suspension of a ban on premarital sex, with New Yorkers Allie and Owen trying to find connection while it lasts. Travis Braun’s screenplay treats that arrangement chiefly as a deadline for romantic mishaps. It is a large thing to ask us to accept before we can enjoy watching two people flirt.

Monica Barbaro plays Allie and Callum Turner plays Owen, and their attraction is the most persuasive thing here. There is enough ease between them to suggest that a film with fewer rules might have found plenty for them to do. Barbaro brings warmth to Allie’s search for connection, while Turner makes an agreeable partner in the business of looking interested and getting into difficulties. The pleasure of watching them together survives some dialogue and situations that do not deserve it.

The comedy occasionally catches up with the casting. We laughed at the daydream sequences, which briefly let sexual imagination into a film otherwise oddly nervous about sex. Gluck finds some freedom there, but Braun’s succession of complications too often feels like an obligation to keep the night busy. Too many of the jokes seem anxious to establish that nobody is enjoying the wrong thing.

Yaron Orbach’s New York photography gives the romance an attractive place to happen, and the location work is one of the film’s uncomplicated pleasures. Scott Kuzio’s production design cannot fill in what the script leaves vague about daily life under the ban. The city looks ready for a night out, but the writing has not made its inhabitants’ acceptance of the restriction believable. That leaves the look of an ordinary romantic comedy carrying a rule that ought to change almost everything about ordinary romance.

Tia Nolan and Robert Nassau edit a film that feels crowded even at 103 minutes. Moving between mishaps does not solve the problem of how little the central situation develops, and the busyness becomes tiring. Christopher Stracey and Este Haim’s music cannot persuade us to relax into a night out governed by this particular clock. The film keeps encouraging us to enjoy ourselves while supplying fresh reasons to question how any of this is supposed to work.

A romantic comedy does not owe us a policy paper, and there is nothing wrong with an absurd obstacle to getting two attractive people together. This particular obstacle makes the government responsible for deciding when unmarried people may have sex. Once Braun makes that the reason for the rush, the film needs some curiosity about what it does to people. Instead, Gluck keeps returning to familiar romantic business, and the effort to stay cheerful begins to feel evasive.

We can see the case for simply enjoying Barbaro and Turner, and the film becomes more engaging whenever their chemistry takes priority. But the jokes are too patchy to make ignoring the premise a worthwhile bargain. Anyone drawn by the possibility of a rude comedy about sexual restrictions will find the timidity particularly frustrating. Save it for an evening when liking the leads is enough.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

47
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
9

Most critics are unconvinced by One Night Only, though praise for Monica Barbaro and Callum Turner is widespread. Their charm and chemistry give the romance some warmth, even in reviews that find the plotting contrived or the jokes weak. The New York setting, occasional comic flourishes and cameos also earn approval, but the prevailing view is that these pleasures cannot compensate for a poorly developed premise about an annual window of legal premarital sex.

The sharpest divide concerns how lightly the film treats that restriction: detractors find its politics troubling and its attitude to sex timid, while supporters enjoy the romantic mishaps without demanding sustained satire. Deadline welcomes the emphasis on laughs over the premise, and /Film finds the world-building persuasive, marking a wide spread of opinion. Even the leads are not universally admired: NME finds their chemistry tepid, against the broader agreement that they are the film’s chief strength.

The New York Times
5 August 2026 · Natalia Winkelman
65*

The critic finds the premise of a yearly 12-hour exemption from a premarital-sex ban to be a silly but workable hook for a rom-com, following two New Yorkers on their parallel quests for connection during that window. The leads' chemistry and the film's light tone are noted as strengths amid the dystopian setup.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 August 2026 · ★★★ · Elizabeth Weitzman
60

The critic describes it as flirtatious and entertaining with clever ideas and cameos, but ultimately empty and unwilling to engage with its dystopian premise, calling it a terrible tease for those wanting depth.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
5 August 2026 · D+ · Monica Castillo
43

The critic finds the rom-com conservative and anti-sex despite its premise about legal sex one night a year, praising the leads' chemistry but criticizing the baffling ending that undermines the satire.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 August 2026 · Katie Walsh
40*

The review deems the high-concept premise underbaked and the execution dopey, with the dystopian rules distracting from rather than enhancing the romance. The stars' charm and some gags are praised as the main distractions from the story's structural flaws.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
27 August 2026 · ★★ · Tim Robey
40

The film is dismissed as a contrived, unfunny attempt at raunchy romcom that fails to make its dystopian premise work or generate laughs from its central situation. The critic singles out the appealing chemistry and sex appeal of leads Monica Barbaro and Callum Turner as the only redeeming elements amid the sketchy contrivances and annoying supporting characters.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
5 August 2026
35*

The critic finds the premise of a single annual night of legal premarital sex too grim and dystopian for a breezy romcom, resulting in an overstuffed yet undercooked film that feels sex-negative and oddly propagandistic. Slick on-location shooting in New York and the leads' appeal are noted as relative strengths amid the contrived plotting and misfiring gags.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The Apartment poster

The Apartment

1960 · A romantic comedy that understands how rules about sex favour the powerful.

Before Sunrise poster89

Before Sunrise

1995 · Two strangers and a deadline, with enough conversation to make both matter.

The Lobster poster

The Lobster

2015 · A society regulates romance, and the film follows that cruelty much further.

Rye Lane poster78

Rye Lane

2023 · Two appealing leads roam a city in a comedy that trusts their company.

The Lunchbox poster

The Lunchbox

2013 · An urban romance that gives loneliness and tentative connection room to develop.