Michael J. Fox (Michael J. Fox) sits at a kitchen island as family members laugh together
Film review

STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie

2023 · Directed by Davis Guggenheim · 1h 35m · KMRB 12

In a sentenceAn actor living with Parkinson’s has plenty to say, and no apparent wish to be discussed in hushed tones

Michael J. Fox talks with director Davis Guggenheim about his life and acting career while living with Parkinson’s disease. Clips from his performances, archive footage and re-enactments accompany his recollections of a restless working life. His wife Tracy Pollan and Sam Fox also appear as themselves, with family conversations alongside the account of fame. Michael J. Fox tells the story in his own voice, while the film brings his remembered career into contact with the physical difficulties of his present-day life. The exchanges with his family and the director keep returning attention to the person behind the familiar performances.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Davis Guggenheim’s affectionate documentary gives Michael J. Fox space to be funny and candid about a difficult life. Inventive editing keeps the biography lively, though some harder questions go unasked.

Davis Guggenheim understands that a film about Michael J. Fox need not become solemn simply because it deals with Parkinson’s disease. STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie is warm, funny and thoughtfully assembled, with a subject whose self-mockery makes the familiar celebrity biography feel less dutiful. The aim is to bring his remembered working life alongside the daily effort of living with illness. It succeeds well enough to make us wish the director were more willing to interrupt a good story with a difficult question.

Editor Michael Harte finds a productive use for the acting archive, fitting performed moments around the experiences Michael J. Fox recounts. These clips do more than remind us of a career: a performance can become an illustration of something private, and the connection supplies a joke or an unexpected bit of feeling. The cutting keeps that exchange between recollection and screen image lively without requiring a separate explanation each time. Occasionally the matching becomes distracting, and we notice the clever choice of a clip when we would rather stay with the speaker.

Julia Liu, Clair Popkin and C. Kim Miles share the cinematography credit, and the present-day conversations have a directness that suits this talkative subject. Keeping our attention on him proves more valuable than finding another way to illustrate his past. The re-enactments, with production design by Matthew Budgeon, give remembered episodes a convincing physical setting and help the film move between its different kinds of footage. They are useful, though the interviews have more to offer than even a carefully reconstructed memory.

We were moved by the contrast between the quickness of Michael J. Fox’s humour and the difficulty of his movement. The jokes do not make the physical struggle disappear, and the film is clear enough about that struggle to let the laughter come without embarrassment. Tracy Pollan’s exchanges with him are particularly welcome, because the account of their marriage has room for humour as well as care. The family conversations let him be someone people know well, tease and answer back, which gives a fuller sense of him than another statement about resilience would.

The main reservation is that Davis Guggenheim could ask harder questions. Michael J. Fox is an engaging guide to his own life, but the film seldom challenges the account he offers, and some stretches of his later career pass with too little examination. At 95 minutes it is brisk, yet another ingenious combination of clips is not always what the biography needs. A longer conversation, or more time spent on an uncomfortable subject, might have told us something that the well-chosen footage cannot.

John Powell’s music supports the warmth of the film, although it sometimes adds encouragement to scenes that already carry enough feeling. By the standards of celebrity documentaries, there is still a welcome amount of space here for the subject to speak, rather than for admirers to explain his importance. The affection is earned through the conversations, particularly when humour interrupts any temptation to treat illness as the whole of a person’s character. Watch it for the conversation, rather than expecting a complete account of the career.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
19
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics find STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie moving, funny and candid, with praise clustering around Fox’s self-deprecating wit and the inventive editing. The reviews repeatedly admire how footage from his acting career connects with interviews, archive material and recreations to tell his personal story. His openness about Parkinson’s, alongside intimate access to his family, gives the portrait its emotional force. Several critics welcome its warmth without finding it sentimental or fawning.

The reservations concern depth rather than Fox’s appeal, and the spread runs from enthusiastic praise to a few mixed responses, with none negative. Digital Spy wants more exploration of his life and career, a concern shared by some otherwise favourable reviews. The Wrap finds the rapid use of clips occasionally distracting, while Empire considers the ending somewhat sentimental. Critics differ chiefly over how much the film’s engaging company compensates for what it leaves unexplored.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jayne Nelson
100

Nelson finds the documentary remarkable and heartfelt. She singles out its clever editing of performance footage to illustrate Fox’s life before and after his diagnosis.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 May 2023 · Robert Lloyd
85*

Lloyd finds the documentary engaging and satisfying, while offering an affectionate portrait of Fox without fawning over him. He singles out the film’s candid, intimate access to Fox and his family, including its clear-eyed portrayal of Parkinson’s challenges.

Read the full review →
Vulture
3 January 2024 · Jen Chaney
85*

Chaney finds the documentary clear-eyed and uplifting without becoming sentimental or demanding hero worship. She praises its inventive editing, which braids Fox’s films, archival footage, reenactments, and memoir narration into a portrait of his restless life.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
11 May 2023 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80

O’Sullivan finds the documentary unmissable and praises Fox’s self-deprecating wit. She singles out the candid back-and-forth between Fox and director Davis Guggenheim, along with the banter with Fox’s family.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 May 2023 · ★★★★ · Mark Kermode
80

Kermode finds the documentary intimate, uplifting and frequently funny, praising Fox’s self-effacing candour and resilience. He especially singles out the loving portrait of Fox’s marriage to Tracy Pollan, which gives the film the feeling of a great love story.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 January 2023 · festival review · Daniel Fienberg
80*

Fienberg finds the documentary satisfying and inspiring, while noting that some parts of Fox’s life merit further exploration. He praises its intimate access and inventive blend of interviews, reenactments, and archival footage.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie worth watching?
STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie is worth watching for its funny, candid conversations about fame, family and Parkinson’s disease, and we score it 80 out of 100. We recommend it for Michael J. Fox’s self-mockery and the lively use of his acting archive, with one caveat: the affectionate approach leaves harder questions and parts of his career underexamined.
How long is STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie, and what is it rated?
STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie runs 1h 35m and is rated 12 by the KMRB in South Korea. It is a documentary film.
Where can I watch STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie in South Korea?
STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie is streaming on Apple TV in South Korea, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from ₩3,000. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie, and is it suitable for children?
STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. The physical difficulties of living with Parkinson’s disease may be upsetting, though humour and family conversation keep the treatment from becoming solemn. The certificate indicates adult material; we cannot give a more specific warning about violence or frightening content.
How does STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie compare to The Gleaners and I?
STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie offers a focused, affectionate celebrity portrait, while The Gleaners and I follows a more wandering curiosity about people and what they discard. We favour the former for candid conversation with a familiar performer, and the latter for broader discovery, humour and companionship. Neither is without a reservation: Guggenheim asks too few difficult questions, while Varda sometimes wanders away from someone worth hearing.
What should I watch after STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie?
After STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie, try The Gleaners and I (2000, Fi1m 85): An inquisitive camera finds humour, ageing and companionship well beyond the expected biography. Then My Left Foot (1989, Fi1m 85): A pricklier portrait of talent and physical difficulty, with little patience for saintliness.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Life Itself (2014) · not reviewed yetAnother candid account of a public life altered by illness, without surrendering humour.

  2. Dick Johnson Is Dead (2020) · not reviewed yetFamily affection and playful reconstruction make difficult conversations about mortality easier to enter.

  3. The Gleaners and I (2000, Fi1m 85)An inquisitive camera finds humour, ageing and companionship well beyond the expected biography.

  4. My Left Foot (1989, Fi1m 85)A pricklier portrait of talent and physical difficulty, with little patience for saintliness.

  5. The Kid Stays in the Picture (2002) · not reviewed yetAnother inventive use of archive, with a narrator worth listening to and questioning.

STILL: A Michael J. Fox Movie (2023) review: Warm, funny and a little (South Korea) | Fi1m