Robbie Hart (Adam Sandler) and Julia Sullivan (Drew Barrymore) smiling at a party
Film review

The Wedding Singer

1998 · Directed by Frank Coraci · 1h 37m

In a sentenceA wedding singer worth rooting for, even when the jokes deserve a quiet word outside

In 1985, Robbie Hart (Adam Sandler) is a would-be rock star working the wedding-band circuit. He makes a living entertaining wedding guests while his own musical ambitions go unfulfilled. His romantic story centres on Julia Sullivan (Drew Barrymore), with Holly Sullivan (Christine Taylor) and Sammy (Allen Covert) among the people around them. Weddings supply the setting and the decade’s pop songs accompany a singer caught between the work he can get and the life he wants for himself.

Fi1m review

Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore make this a warm, appealing romance, helped by a lively pop soundtrack. The middle drifts and the broad humour sometimes gets in their way, but we recommend it to anyone with a weakness for romantic comedy.

Frank Coraci’s The Wedding Singer is a likeable romance with an uneven supply of jokes. Anyone coming chiefly for the comedy may feel a little short-changed, though there is enough affection here to compensate. Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore give a simple courtship the warmth it needs to carry us through some ordinary writing. The film wants us to enjoy being with these people, and for most of its 97 minutes we do.

Robbie Hart is a would-be rock star working the wedding-band circuit, where everyone else’s big day is another shift. It is a useful comic occupation, requiring cheerfulness regardless of how the person holding the microphone feels. Adam Sandler makes Robbie’s need to be liked affecting without asking us to mistake him for a saint. We were more touched than we expected by the gentleness of his performance; his eagerness to please gives Robbie something vulnerable beneath the comic business. The broader humour can obscure that quality, but it remains the reason to follow him.

Drew Barrymore is equally important to the film’s appeal, giving Julia Sullivan a warmth that makes the attraction easy to believe. She has a relaxed presence, and the romance benefits from the sense that these two might enjoy an ordinary conversation. Tim Herlihy’s screenplay does not give their story many surprises, but it does give the actors a relationship we can accept. The trouble comes when the comic writing presses harder than the romance needs, leaving the performers to supply the tact.

The 1980s setting provides plenty of amusement, although some of it amounts to congratulating us for recognising the decade. Perry Andelin Blake’s production design contributes to that cheerfully exaggerated nostalgia, which is enjoyable until it starts competing with the people. Tim Suhrstedt’s cinematography keeps the courtship looking approachable, an appropriate choice for a romance with such modest ambitions. The look suits the film, but the period jokes occasionally feel like a substitute for better writing.

The pop soundtrack does more useful work, supplying energy and feeling without requiring another comic interruption. Teddy Castellucci’s music is less distinctive, though it fits the film’s straightforward emotional approach. A romance this modest does not need much help announcing what it wants us to feel. The songs are enjoyable company, and the film usually knows when to let that be enough.

The slack middle is harder to excuse. Tom Lewis’s editing does not keep the courtship moving with the same assurance as the lighter comedy, and the story spends too long relying on goodwill already earned. The lowbrow jokes are uneven too; some have an amiable foolishness, while others interrupt a mood the actors have worked to establish. Nothing here ruins the romance, but enough of it could go for us to notice.

As a romantic comedy, it has more interest in making its couple likeable than in testing the familiar formula. We can live with that when the attraction is this persuasive, though the film would benefit from trusting it more consistently. Its sweetness survives the weaker material without becoming exhausting. Choose it for an undemanding evening, with a tolerance for jokes that try a little too hard.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find The Wedding Singer a warm, good-natured romantic comedy, with praise centred on Adam Sandler’s gentler performance and his chemistry with Drew Barrymore. The reviews repeatedly credit his charm and the pair’s believable affection with making a simple boy-meets-girl story work. The exaggerated 1980s setting and pop soundtrack also draw approval, adding comic energy to a romance that several critics find touching as well as funny.

Reservations concern the storytelling more than the central pairing: the plot is described as loose or simple, while the lowbrow humour remains a qualification even in a favourable review. The Hollywood Reporter specifically faults a sagging middle, despite praising the supporting cast and soundtrack. The spread runs from enthusiastic to mixed, with no negative assessments recorded; RogerEbert.com offers a more reserved response, though it still appreciates the film’s amiable romance.

Los Angeles Times
13 February 1998 · Kevin Thomas
90*

Thomas finds the film a sparkling, graceful romantic comedy that sends audiences home happy. He especially praises Adam Sandler’s unexpectedly appealing romantic performance and the charm he and Drew Barrymore bring to their roles.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 February 1998 · Leonard Klady
90*

Klady finds the film spirited, funny, warm, and unabashedly romantic. He especially praises Adam Sandler’s breakthrough performance and the human warmth he brings to the comedy.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
85*

Westbrook finds the film irresistible, despite its simple boy-meets-girl story. She praises its exaggerated 1980s nostalgia, lively soundtrack, and the appealing pairing of Sandler and Barrymore.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones finds the film an entertaining, good-natured romantic comedy. He praises the chemistry between Sandler and Barrymore and the film’s playful use of its 1980s setting and pop soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Total Film
5 June 1998 · ★★★★ · Yael Shuv
80

Shuv finds the film a pleasant, quirky, genuinely touching comedy that succeeds despite its loose plot and lowbrow humor. She especially praises Adam Sandler’s puppy-dog charm and the believable romantic chemistry he shares with Drew Barrymore.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 February 1998 · Michael Rechtshaffen
72*

The review calls the film a winning romantic comedy and Sandler’s best effort, though it faults a sagging middle. It praises the supporting cast and the film’s lively use of its 1980s soundtrack.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Wedding Singer worth watching?
The Wedding Singer is worth watching for its warm romance and appealing leads, and we score it 76 out of 100. We recommend it to romantic-comedy lovers who enjoy a lively pop soundtrack, though the middle drifts and the lowbrow jokes sometimes get in the way of Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore’s persuasive chemistry.
How long is The Wedding Singer, and what is it rated?
The Wedding Singer runs 1h 37m. It is a romance and comedy film.
Where can I watch The Wedding Singer in Japan?
The Wedding Singer is not on any streaming or rental service in Japan at the moment. It is available in 29 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is The Wedding Singer, and is it suitable for children?
The Wedding Singer carries a UK 12 certificate, so we would not choose it for younger children. Its broad, lowbrow humour is the main content concern we can identify; we cannot give a more specific assurance about violence or frightening material from that rating alone.
How does The Wedding Singer compare to Strictly Ballroom?
The Wedding Singer offers a relaxed, pop-accompanied romance, while Strictly Ballroom gives its courtship more energy through dancing. We favour The Wedding Singer for an undemanding evening with an appealing couple, and Strictly Ballroom for livelier entertainment; both have familiar stories and broad comedy, but the former’s slack middle makes it the less consistently engaging choice.
What should I watch after The Wedding Singer?
After The Wedding Singer, try Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83): Broad comedy and an earnest courtship find room beside cheerfully excessive dancing. Then Rye Lane (2023, Fi1m 78): A brighter, quicker courtship with two leads worth spending an evening alongside.

Cast

Awards

Chlotrudis Award for Best Actress, 1998

Nominated
Chlotrudis Award for Best Actress

MTV Movie Award for Best Comedic Performance, 1998

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Comedic Performance

MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss, 1998

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss

MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo, 1998

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Shop Around the Corner (1940) · not on Fi1m yetA patient, funny romance whose prickly leads take time to recognise their good fortune.

  2. Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83)Broad comedy and an earnest courtship find room beside cheerfully excessive dancing.

  3. Sing Street (2016) · not on Fi1m yetPop music gives another hopeful young romantic the nerve to risk embarrassment.

  4. Rye Lane (2023, Fi1m 78)A brighter, quicker courtship with two leads worth spending an evening alongside.

  5. Enough Said (2013) · not on Fi1m yetAnother romance that trusts appealing actors, awkward conversation and modest emotional stakes.

The Wedding Singer (1998) review: sweet leads do the hard work (Japan) | Fi1m