Tom Cooper (Russell Crowe) stands beside an overturned car, looking over his shoulder
Film review

Unhinged

2020 · Directed by Derrick Borte · 1h 30m

In a sentenceRussell Crowe makes a persuasive case for letting the other driver go first

Rachel Flynn (Caren Pistorius) encounters the Man (Tom Cooper), played by Russell Crowe, during a dispute in traffic. She wants to carry on with her journey; he wants the encounter to continue on his terms. Kyle Flynn (Gabriel Bateman) is caught in the confrontation alongside Rachel as the driver’s anger becomes a threat. Driving away does not settle the matter. The stranger turns a roadside argument into a pursuit, forcing Rachel to find a way of getting herself and Kyle beyond his reach.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Russell Crowe makes the driver frightening, and the chases have some bite. But Unhinged struggles to turn its violence into sustained suspense, leaving its capable cast with an increasingly implausible script.

Unhinged has a frightening driver and too little suspense to keep him interesting for 90 minutes. Derrick Borte makes a road-rage thriller that wants an everyday encounter to feel capable of turning murderous at any moment. Russell Crowe supplies the necessary threat, and the driving sequences have enough force and clarity to hold our attention. The trouble is Carl Ellsworth’s screenplay, which repeatedly asks escalating violence to compensate for increasingly unlikely behaviour.

Crowe understands how unpleasant it is to be confronted by a man who believes his anger gives him authority. His physical bulk matters, but so does the conviction that everyone else ought to accommodate him. We felt properly uneasy during the traffic-side encounter, because Crowe makes a commonplace exchange feel impossible to end safely. Borte gives that discomfort enough time to register. For a short stretch, the situation is frightening without needing much explanation.

Caren Pistorius has the less rewarding task of playing Rachel Flynn opposite a villain allowed to dominate almost everything. We need to care about her choices for the pursuit to remain gripping, but the writing is too busy arranging the next threat. Gabriel Bateman’s Kyle Flynn and Jimmi Simpson’s Andy add people to worry about without giving the drama much room to develop. Ellsworth keeps the danger coming, yet too often the people inside it feel useful chiefly because they can be endangered.

The action is more convincing than the plotting. Brendan Galvin’s cinematography and the editing by Michael McCusker, Steve Mirkovich and Tim Mirkovich keep the driving sequences readable and make the impacts register. Borte can organise a pursuit, and those passages briefly restore the tension that the script has let slip. There is considerable skill involved in making this kind of action clear, even when the reasons for another chase are wearing thin.

David Buckley’s score has little room to build anticipation when the film is always hurrying towards another eruption. Freddy Waff’s production design never gives the surroundings much character of their own; we remember the driving more clearly than the places it passes through. Neither contribution provides much relief from the increasingly repetitive pursuit. By this point, we were tired of the threats, because each escalation made the driver’s behaviour harder to believe.

A road thriller does not need a complicated villain, and unpleasantness is hardly a fault in itself. It does need to make us believe that the people being pursued might escape, and that the person pursuing them has limits. Here, the growing implausibility makes it harder to worry. The film raises the subject of male resentment without having much to say about it. Crowe suggests a man who has made other people responsible for his disappointments, but the screenplay is content to keep finding outlets for his rage.

There is enough craft here to see why some critics have enjoyed the film as rough, quick entertainment. We cannot quite join them: the initial unease gives way to repetition, and the violence stops making the danger feel real. Crowe remains a reason to be curious, though not enough of one for us to recommend the film. Go in for him, if at all, and do not expect the script to keep up.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

44
Positive
5
Mixed
6
Negative
11

The reviews lean negative on Unhinged, though Russell Crowe’s threatening presence earns praise across much of the divide. Even several critics who dislike the film credit his commitment to its volatile antagonist. Supporters find a brisk, darkly funny pulp thriller, with effective driving sequences and bursts of violence that compensate for familiar plotting. Some detractors also acknowledge the action’s technical skill, but find little substance beyond the pursuit.

The spread is wide, with disagreement over both the entertainment value and the treatment of male resentment. The Guardian reads the film as an entertaining send-up of emasculated men. IndieWire instead finds it unpleasantly misogynistic and judges Crowe’s performance one-note and overdriven. Elsewhere, reservations centre on implausible plotting, thin writing and violence that becomes monotonous rather than suspenseful; even favourable reviews tend to concede that freshness and thoughtful social commentary are in short supply.

Evening Standard
31 July 2020 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80

O’Sullivan finds the thriller an exuberantly enjoyable, pulpy treat despite its plot holes. She especially praises Russell Crowe’s performance, calling his misogynistic villain both chilling and darkly funny.

Read the full review →
Empire
26 August 2020 · Christina Newland
70*

Newland finds the film a compelling, solid genre thriller despite its lack of freshness. She singles out Russell Crowe’s hulking menace and the film’s slick pacing and bursts of shocking violence.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
1 August 2020 · Simran Hans
70*

Hans finds the thriller entertaining and darkly funny, praising its send-up of emasculated men. She also highlights Russell Crowe’s performance as the volatile antagonist.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 July 2020 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60

The review finds the road-rage thriller predictable but entertaining. It praises Russell Crowe’s enjoyably deranged performance for giving the film a lift.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 July 2020 · ★★★ · Matthew Leyland
60

Leyland calls the film trashy fun despite a predictable plot and increasingly implausible turns. He praises Russell Crowe’s snarling, gleeful performance, while noting that the finale teeters between crowd-pleasing and camp silliness.

Read the full review →
Variety
30 July 2020 · Guy Lodge
60*

Lodge finds the film delivers nasty B-movie thrills but offers little dramatic substance. He singles out Russell Crowe’s oversized performance and the opening scene as especially gripping.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Unhinged worth watching?
Unhinged offers a frightening Russell Crowe performance and forceful chases, but we score it 48 out of 100 and cannot recommend it. Crowe may justify a look for committed thriller fans, though the increasingly implausible script turns the initial unease into repetitive threats rather than sustained suspense.
How long is Unhinged, and what is it rated?
Unhinged runs 1h 30m. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch Unhinged in Switzerland?
Unhinged is available to rent from Apple TV from CHF 4.50. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Unhinged, and is it suitable for children?
Unhinged has a UK 15 certificate and contains escalating violence, forceful driving impacts and a frightening road-rage pursuit, making it unsuitable for children under 15. We find the traffic-side confrontation particularly unsettling because Crowe makes an ordinary disagreement feel impossible to end safely; the violence also makes it a poor choice for squeamish viewers.
How does Unhinged compare to Wild Tales?
Unhinged is the weaker choice beside Wild Tales, which turns everyday grievances vicious with sharper humour and a broader human range. We recommend Wild Tales for its six funny, nasty revenge stories, though a few run long; Unhinged suits those more interested in a single sustained pursuit and Crowe’s threatening presence.
What should I watch after Unhinged?
After Unhinged, try Wild Tales (2014, Fi1m 83): Everyday grievances turn vicious, with sharper humour and a broader human range. Then The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90): For road tension built from precise hazards rather than mounting casualties.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Duel (1971) · not reviewed yetA road pursuit with the patience to make an ordinary lorry terrifying.

  2. The Hitcher (1986) · not reviewed yetAnother dangerous roadside meeting, with more room for uncertainty and dread.

  3. Breakdown (1997) · not reviewed yetAn ordinary journey becomes a convincing nightmare through careful, economical plotting.

  4. Wild Tales (2014, Fi1m 83)Everyday grievances turn vicious, with sharper humour and a broader human range.

  5. The Wages of Fear (1953, Fi1m 90)For road tension built from precise hazards rather than mounting casualties.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever