Film review

Almost Famous

2000 · Directed by Cameron Crowe · 2h 04m · MPA R

In a sentenceWe went backstage for the bad behaviour and came away worrying about the boy

DramaMusic

Teenage rock journalist William Miller (Patrick Fugit) joins a band’s tour and finds himself growing up among the people he hopes to write about. As he gets to know the musicians and the life around them, his enthusiasm for the music meets the demands of reporting on its makers. Cameron Crowe’s drama follows his introduction to the relationships, loyalties and commercial pressures behind the performances. Billy Crudup plays Russell Hammond, Kate Hudson plays Penny Lane, Jason Lee plays Jeff Bebe and Frances McDormand plays Elaine Miller in the ensemble surrounding William.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Cameron Crowe’s Almost Famous is funny, generous and occasionally too forgiving of the people it loves. The performances make its teenage enthusiasm convincing, even when the nostalgia softens behaviour that deserves a harder look.

Almost Famous understands how difficult it is to write honestly about people whose company makes us feel fortunate. Cameron Crowe sends a teenage rock journalist on tour with a band, then gives him ample reason to forget he has a job to do. We recommend it for its performances and its understanding of fandom, despite a tendency to forgive the musicians before we have finished being cross with them. Crowe keeps the boy’s pleasure in being there at the centre.

Patrick Fugit plays William Miller with an earnestness that makes his access to these musicians feel like an enormous event. He does not need to turn the boy into a miniature professional to make his interest in the work believable. We felt protective of William because Fugit’s earnest attention makes every encounter with the band seem so important to him. He makes it easy to recognise the difficulty of dealing with adults whom we would prefer simply to admire.

Kate Hudson’s Penny Lane makes the attraction of this company equally clear, and her warmth does much to justify the film’s affection for it. Billy Crudup, as Russell Hammond, is persuasive company for a boy susceptible to musicians. His appeal matters: without it, William’s enthusiasm would be much harder to understand, and the film would spend its time asking us to excuse the boy. Frances McDormand’s Elaine Miller brings welcome firmness to a film inclined to indulge people, giving the surrounding charm some useful resistance.

John Toll’s cinematography makes proximity to the musicians feel inviting, which is right for William and occasionally too kind to everyone else. Editors Saar Klein and Joe Hutshing give the encounters time to develop, although the journey can start to feel shapeless between them. Nancy Wilson’s music helps maintain the tenderness without treating the boy’s love of rock as a joke. These are sympathetic contributions to a film that wants us to enjoy accompanying its characters, and is prepared to let the story wander while we do.

The softness does matter. Crowe’s writing recognises the awkwardness of reporting on people one likes, but it is less willing to follow that awkwardness into sustained discomfort. The wandering becomes a weakness when another appealing encounter postpones the difficult business of deciding what William should make of these people. We can enjoy their company and still want the film to be less accommodating about the selfishness that comes with it.

The consensus is markedly cooler than we are, with the objections centred on Crowe’s softened picture of rock life. We think that criticism gives too little weight to how convincingly the film presents a fan’s excitement. A coming-of-age film need not account for an entire industry, and this one understands how the wish to belong can interfere with judgement. Its mistake is to become so fond of the people William meets that it sometimes seems reluctant to let him judge them at all.

We would choose it for an evening when a young person’s enthusiasm is welcome company. Allow for some wandering, and for Crowe’s habit of liking almost everyone a little too much. Anyone hoping the musicians will receive a thorough interrogation should bring a second journalist.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
3

The reviews lean favourable, though affection for Almost Famous is far from unanimous. Praise centres on the warmth of Crowe’s coming-of-age story, its feel for music and fandom, and an engaging ensemble that makes the backstage encounters persuasive. Supporters find humour and emotional generosity in its nostalgia, valuing the personal observations and fondness for the characters more than any promise of rock excess.

The split is wide, and the film’s sweetness is the chief dividing point: admirers find it touching, while detractors see sentimentality that avoids difficult consequences. Reservations also concern loose storytelling, mild drama and an uncertain balance between nostalgia and satire. The Guardian argues that the film drains rock of danger, while making an exception for Philip Seymour Hoffman’s Lester Bangs. Sight and Sound likewise praises the journalism and Bangs material, but finds the treatment of the scene’s sex and drugs too coy.

RogerEbert.com
15 September 2000 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a lovely, funny and touching coming-of-age story about a teenage rock journalist on tour with a band. It captures the era's idealism and commerce with gratitude and hope.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 May 2012 · NB
80*

Crowe's quasi-autobiographical story is a sweet-minded, picaresque yarn that diffuses moral questions into harmony while offering stacked attractions and memorable performances. The critic singles out the engaging cast and overall charm as its main strengths.

Read the full review →
Variety
8 September 2000
75*

The film is a sweetly amiable memoir of a boy's coming of age with rock 'n' roll that is more gentle and modestly insightful than exhilarating. It is eager to please and does so through its credible personal observations and affection for its characters.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
11 September 2000 · David Denby
60*

The quasi-autobiographical film is likable with easy affection for its characters and scene but is awfully mild and amorphous. It is underdramatized and irresolute, caught between nostalgia and satire.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 January 2001 · John Wrathall
40*

The film captures the music and fandom well but is overly sweet and nostalgic, shying away from the sex, drugs and honesty of the rock scene. The critic singles out the portrayal of rock journalism and the mentor figure Lester Bangs for praise amid broader complaints about coyness and sentimentality.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 May 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
30*

The critic finds the film a self-absorbed vehicle for baby-boomer nostalgia that prioritizes cozy reminiscence over substance. He singles out the overly blissful tone and avoidance of real dramatic consequences for complaint.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2001

Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Won
Best Writing, Original Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

A Hard Day's Night poster

A Hard Day's Night

1964 · A less reverent trip alongside musicians, with sharper jokes about managing their fame

The Commitments poster82

The Commitments

1991 · An unruly band provides the jokes, while ambition tests everyone’s patience and loyalty

Linda Linda Linda poster

Linda Linda Linda

2005 · Schoolgirls form a band, with friendship carrying more weight than musical polish

The Band's Visit poster

The Band's Visit

2007 · Musicians away from home find awkward company and unexpected tenderness in unfamiliar surroundings

Sing Street poster

Sing Street

2016 · Another young enthusiast discovers how making music complicates the wish to be noticed