Brad (Mark Wahlberg) holds a small object while Elijah (Paul Walter Hauser) smiles beside him
Film review

Balls Up

2026 · Directed by Peter Farrelly · 1h 44m

In a sentenceA World Cup comedy with enough genital jokes to make the changing room seem restrained

A man gets drunk and disrupts the World Cup. Brad (Mark Wahlberg) and Elijah (Paul Walter Hauser) are the central characters in Balls Up, which also features Pavio Curto (Sacha Baron Cohen), Santos (Benjamin Bratt) and Emilia (Eva De Dominici). The football tournament is one setting for the action; the story also takes in the jungle. Burgess (Molly Shannon), Eco Warrior Julie (Chelsey Crisp) and Eco Warrior Aaron (Eric Andre) feature in a comedy that mixes its drunken football incident with action and adventure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Peter Farrelly’s comedy is too repetitive to recommend. Mark Wahlberg supplies some welcome foolishness and Dave Palmer supplies a lively score, but the genital jokes keep coming after the film has run out of ideas.

Balls Up is a poor comedy with some willing performers and too little for them to do. Peter Farrelly directs a film that treats repeated genital jokes as sufficient reason to keep going. The script, by Paul Wernick and Rhett Reese, is short of comic development. We have no objection to the subject matter, but a joke about genitalia needs just as much construction as any other joke. This film too often stops once the subject has been raised.

Mark Wahlberg, playing Brad, is the strongest reason to persist. His comic performance has an eagerness that suits this sort of foolishness, and he does not appear embarrassed by material that gives us ample reason to be. Paul Walter Hauser plays Elijah, completing the central pair, but the writing does too little to make their predicament become steadily funnier. The comedy needs each new mishap to alter what these characters can do next; instead, the set-pieces feel largely replaceable.

Sacha Baron Cohen gets a little further as Pavio Curto because his barely intelligible accent is a specific comic idea. We laughed at the difficulty of making out what he was saying. There is a small, immediate pleasure in listening harder and finding that the effort itself has become ridiculous. It is enough to show how much more useful a particular performance choice can be than another genital reference, though the joke has limited mileage.

John Brawley’s cinematography and Gary Mackay’s production design have football and jungle settings to work with, but the changes of location do little to relieve the repetition. Sam Seig’s editing cannot make these crude set-pieces feel like a story gathering speed. The film keeps providing another incident when what it needs is a consequence that changes the next joke. At 104 minutes, it has enough time to develop its premise, yet it gives the same sort of gag far more attention than it merits.

Dave Palmer’s music is more enjoyable. The samba and bossa nova influences give the film a lift without asking us to find another crude gag amusing. We would happily have heard more of that ease in the dialogue, which keeps pressing for a response rather than allowing comic embarrassment to build. The music supplies a welcome change of pace from the insistent jokes, and its lightness suits the comedy this film is trying to be.

We were bored by the repeated genital jokes, and the lack of movement in the plot made them harder to forgive. Gross-out comedy can accommodate thin characters, improbable events and a fair amount of ugliness when the timing is good and the consequences keep changing. Here, the succession of crude set-pieces gives us too few reasons to care about the next one. The script keeps returning to material it has already exhausted.

The occasional laugh makes the waste more frustrating, because there is enough comic ability here to suggest a better evening. Anyone attached to Mark Wahlberg’s comedy may find a few passages worth their patience, and Dave Palmer’s score deserves its own hearing. For the rest of us, 104 minutes is a substantial commitment to jokes that wear out quickly. A fondness for the cast will have to do most of the work.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

49
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
3

The reviews lean towards disappointment, with praise concentrated in individual comic performances rather than the film as a whole. The Guardian is the clear enthusiast, finding the juvenile humour winning and praising Mark Wahlberg’s comic performance alongside Dave Palmer’s samba- and bossa nova-inflected score. The Hollywood Reporter finds the comedy increasingly tiresome but singles out Sacha Baron Cohen’s unintelligible accent as its funniest element. There is little agreement on how much these performances redeem the material.

Reservations centre on repetition, crude humour and weak plotting. The AV Club finds the genital jokes repetitive and the story stagnant, while Empire objects to shapeless crude set-pieces and offensive stereotypes, finding little to enjoy. The spread is wide, from affectionate approval to outright rejection. Three of the seven reviews have no accessible verdict or supporting detail, however, so the specific points of agreement rest on the four readable accounts.

The Guardian
15 April 2026 · Andrew Lawrence
80*

Lawrence finds the comedy juvenile but winning, and says it channels the Farrelly brothers’ classic style. He especially praises Mark Wahlberg’s comic performance and Dave Palmer’s samba- and bossa nova-inflected score.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
64*

The URL identifies this as a review of Balls Up, but the page content is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
62*

The URL identifies this as a review, but the page text is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
15 April 2026 · D+ · Jacob Oller
43

The critic finds the comedy tedious and unsuccessful as a would-be romp. They single out its repetitive genital jokes and stagnant plotting as major complaints.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
15 April 2026 · Frank Scheck
25*

Scheck finds the comedy uninspired and increasingly tiresome, calling it a streaming-era time-filler. He singles out Sacha Baron Cohen’s unintelligible accent as the film’s funniest moments.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 April 2026 · John Nugent
10*

Nugent calls the film a miserable failure, finding little that is funny or lovable. He singles out its shapeless succession of crude set-pieces and its offensive stereotypes.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Balls Up worth watching?
Balls Up is too repetitive to recommend, and we score it 40 out of 100. Mark Wahlberg’s willing foolishness and Dave Palmer’s lively music offer some relief, but the genital jokes quickly wear out; only viewers particularly attached to Wahlberg’s comedy are likely to find enough here to justify 104 minutes.
How long is Balls Up, and what is it rated?
Balls Up runs 1h 44m. It is a comedy and action film.
Where can I watch Balls Up in Serbia?
Balls Up is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in Serbia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Balls Up, and is it suitable for children?
Balls Up has a UK 15 certificate and is unsuitable for children under 15, with repeated genital jokes and a drunken World Cup disruption central to its comedy. We would steer younger viewers elsewhere; the crude humour is the clearest concern, with no basis here for a more specific warning about violence or frightening scenes.
How does Balls Up compare to A Fish Called Wanda?
Balls Up is the weaker comedy beside A Fish Called Wanda, which we recommend for its tighter timing and better-developed consequences. Both trade in sexual embarrassment and stupidity, but Balls Up offers largely replaceable crude set-pieces, while the crime farce gives its cast more productive ways to irritate one another, despite pushing a few jokes too hard.
What should I watch after Balls Up?
After Balls Up, try A Fish Called Wanda (1988, Fi1m 83): Greed, sexual embarrassment and stupidity collide with considerably more care for consequences. Then Wild Tales (2014, Fi1m 83): For bad behaviour that escalates with purpose, and consequences that actually sting.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The In-Laws (1979) · not on Fi1m yetA more tightly constructed escape from trouble, with an excellent mismatched pair.

  2. A Fish Called Wanda (1988, Fi1m 83)Greed, sexual embarrassment and stupidity collide with considerably more care for consequences.

  3. The Nice Guys (2016) · not on Fi1m yetTwo hapless men stumble through danger, with comic timing worth the bruises.

  4. The Dinner Game (1998) · not on Fi1m yetA foolish invitation creates escalating trouble, with much sharper comic consequences.

  5. Wild Tales (2014, Fi1m 83)For bad behaviour that escalates with purpose, and consequences that actually sting.

Balls Up (2026) review: Crude jokes wear out their welcome (Serbia) | Fi1m