Film review

Bullets Over Broadway

1994 · Directed by Woody Allen · 1h 38m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe actors make such a fuss about their work that a gangster’s bodyguard starts to seem like sensible company

ComedyCrime

The theatre and the gangster world meet in the 1920s, with a play at the centre of their dealings. John Cusack plays David Shayne, alongside Dianne Wiest as leading lady Helen Sinclair and Jennifer Tilly as Olive Neal. Around the production, artistic ambition has to contend with people used to getting their way, onstage and elsewhere. Chazz Palminteri plays Cheech, a gangster’s bodyguard whose presence brings the two worlds together. Woody Allen directs this backstage crime comedy, with an ensemble that also includes Jim Broadbent, Tracey Ullman and Mary-Louise Parker.

Fi1m review

Woody Allen’s backstage crime comedy is brisk, funny and satisfyingly unkind to artistic vanity. Dianne Wiest and Chazz Palminteri give it bite, though the theatrical clichés and occasional stiff staging keep it from feeling quite as fresh as its best jokes.

Woody Allen’s Bullets Over Broadway is a sharp, funny backstage comedy with a useful shortage of respect for people who announce their own talent. Written by Allen and Douglas McGrath, it puts the theatre beside the gangster business and finds plenty of bullying in both. The actors’ vanity supplies plenty of jokes, though that alone would barely sustain a sketch. Allen and McGrath get further by questioning how much these people understand about the art they claim to serve.

Dianne Wiest’s Helen Sinclair is the main pleasure, a leading lady whose grand manner makes even vanity seem like demanding work. We laughed at the sheer insistence of her performance: Helen expects her importance to be accepted before anyone gets on with anything else. Jennifer Tilly’s Olive Neal supplies a competing, less polished kind of self-regard, and Tilly keeps the caricature forceful without apologising for it. Both performances are broad, but neither actress lets the exaggeration obscure how determined her character is to command attention.

Chazz Palminteri’s Cheech gives the comedy its less comfortable edge. A gangster’s bodyguard among theatre people is an easy excuse for jokes about manners, but Allen and McGrath give him enough importance to challenge the actors’ assumptions about talent. Palminteri is funny without making Cheech seem harmless, which matters whenever criminal behaviour enters the jokes about art. His performance keeps the gangster side of the story from becoming merely a convenient supply of interruptions.

Carlo Di Palma’s cinematography and Santo Loquasto’s production design make the 1920s setting a pleasure to spend time in. The period atmosphere helps the theatre and gangster scenes belong to the same comedy, even when the performances threaten to pull it in several directions. The staging is less reliable, and Allen sometimes leaves an exchange looking awkwardly arranged rather than spontaneous. That stiffness is noticeable in a film whose dialogue moves so quickly.

Susan E. Morse’s editing helps maintain that pace, and the 98-minute running time is a sensible fit for the material. There is little opportunity for the comedy to sag, although speed cannot disguise every familiar type. Allen and McGrath sometimes rely on recognisable theatrical foolishness when a more particular observation would have been funnier. Once a character’s vanity has been established, repeating it gives the actor something to do but does not always give us another joke.

As a backstage comedy, it benefits from letting criminal behaviour intrude on the usual rivalries and wounded pride. Farce needs characters who regard their own wishes as urgent, and the actors and gangsters are equally well suited to that requirement. Allen and McGrath find something uncomfortable in the ease with which talk of artistic achievement can push ordinary decency out of consideration. The film gives that question enough weight to sharpen the laughter without stopping for a lengthy discussion of it.

There is no need to bring much reverence for the theatre to this one. A tolerance for actors being extravagant will help, particularly when the writing falls back on familiar types. Choose it for Wiest and Palminteri, and watch it with someone who has endured a long explanation of another person’s creative process.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Time Out
25 February 2015 · TCh
85*

The critic calls it Allen's fizziest piece in years and a merciless satire on the pretensions of theatre folk. They single out the fiercely competitive caricatures from Tilly and Wiest for praise while noting some clichés and clumsy staging but ultimately recommend seeing it.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 May 1995
80*

The critic praises the rapid-fire gags and the interplay between the gangster and theater worlds in this 1920s-set comedy, highlighting strong ensemble performances especially from Dianne Wiest as the vampish leading lady.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Colin Kennedy
75*

The review calls it a delightful diversion with a remarkable ensemble and brilliant gags, noting the vivid period atmosphere and witty dialogue as a charming addition to Allen's canon, though it lacks the depth of his best work.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 October 1994 · Peter Rainer

The critic finds the film a lively theatrical and gangster satire that riffs on the nature of artistry, with Cheech as the true artist among poseurs. He praises the over-the-top performances, especially Dianne Wiest as Helen Sinclair and Jennifer Tilly as Olive.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 October 1994 · Roger Ebert

The critic praises the film's clever twist involving a gangster's bodyguard who improves the play, turning a routine backstage comedy into something funnier and tougher. He highlights the strong ensemble cast, especially Chazz Palminteri's performance, and the dark humor about art and morality.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 September 1994 · festival review · Janet Maslin

The critic calls the film a bright, energetic, side-splitting comedy with vital matters on its mind, exactly the kind of sharp-edged farce Allen does best. She singles out the wild card of the gangster Cheech for making the story more than a routine comedy.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

BAFTA Film Awards, 1996

Nominated
Best Original Screenplay

Academy Awards, 1995

Nominated
Best Costume Design
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Nominated
Best Writing, Original Screenplay
Won
Best Supporting Actress

Independent Spirit Awards, 1995

Nominated
Best Screenplay
Won
Best Supporting Female
Won
Best Supporting Male

SAG Awards, 1995

Nominated
Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role
Won
Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role

Writers Guild of America Award for Best Original Screenplay, 1995

Nominated
Writers Guild of America Award for Best Original Screenplay

Golden Globes, 1994

Won
Best Supporting Actress – Motion Picture

National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Supporting Actress, 1994

Won
National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

The Producers poster

The Producers

1967 · Another backstage scheme in which bad behaviour gives the performers plenty to work with

Day for Night poster

Day for Night

1973 · For an ensemble comedy about making art while managing everybody’s inconvenient personal needs

The Ladykillers poster

The Ladykillers

1955 · Criminal confidence proves no protection against foolishness in this dry British ensemble comedy

To Be or Not to Be poster

To Be or Not to Be

1942 · Theatrical vanity becomes dangerously useful in a comedy that lets actors misbehave magnificently

A Film with Me in It poster

A Film with Me in It

2008 · More performers, worse decisions, and criminal complications that keep interrupting the creative work