Caroline Daniels (Samara Weaving) aims a revolver while Oliver Anderson (Kyle Gallner) stands beside her in a field
Film review

Carolina Caroline

2026 · Directed by Adam Rehmeier · 1h 47m

In a sentenceTwo scammers make a succession of motels look like a reasonable setting for romance

Caroline Daniels (Samara Weaving) and Oliver Anderson (Kyle Gallner) are lovers on the run through the American South, scamming their way between dive bars and motels. Their crimes share the story with a romance between two damaged people, with humour and tenderness accompanying their life on the road. Kyra Sedgwick plays Deborah, alongside Jon Gries as Hank Daniels and Tommy G. Kendrick as Charlie. Adam Rehmeier directs this 107-minute story, which combines crime, drama, romance and thriller elements.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The critical consensus favours Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner’s tender, funny partnership. A familiar lovers-on-the-run story earns a qualified recommendation for its romance, with less enthusiasm for the heavier drama.

The critical consensus recommends Carolina Caroline for its lovers, with the familiarity of their crimes as the main caveat. Adam Rehmeier directs Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner in a romance about scammers on the run through the American South. The reviews agree that their connection supplies the interest, and repeatedly single out sincerity, humour and tenderness. For a familiar crime story, that is a useful recommendation: we need a reason to spend time with the people committing the offences.

Caroline Daniels and Oliver Anderson are the couple, and the praise for the performances is unusually consistent. The reported humour between two damaged people is what appeals to us most; it gives the courtship something besides danger to sustain it. We like the idea of these scammers being tender with each other, rather than merely admiring each other’s nerve. An outlaw romance has to make the attraction convincing before the prospect of capture can matter much.

Jean-Philippe Bernier is the cinematographer, and Francesca Palombo is the production designer. The visual qualities identified in the reviews are colour, rough-edged Americana and the dive bars and motels along the route. Those settings suit a relationship conducted on the move, and give the criminal business an ordinary, unglamorous setting. They also establish a useful scale for the story: the appeal described in the reviews lies in two people travelling together, with modest places to stop.

Christopher Bear has the music credit, and country music features in the critical accounts of the film. Justin Krohn edits the 107-minute story, whose livelier passages receive particular praise in the assessment that also questions its more serious scenes. That is a useful distinction for a romance with thriller elements: energy can carry the travelling and the scamming, while serious drama asks more of the writing and performances. The accounts make the lively, playful side sound like the safer bet.

The reservation worth retaining is that the heavier scenes are less persuasive, a complaint raised by one otherwise positive review. Strong chemistry cannot settle every problem a screenplay sets its characters, and a convincing attraction does not guarantee convincing decisions. The repeated references to a familiar story also matter if the crimes are the chief attraction. That familiarity is likely to trouble someone looking for a fresh crime plot more than someone happy to follow a courtship through recognisable situations.

All seven reviews are positive, which makes the agreement about the leads more useful than any isolated phrase of praise. The consensus score is 79, a good fit for an appealing genre film with reservations about familiar plotting and the weightier drama. We would keep the recommendation at that level: an evening’s prospect for people who already enjoy lovers on the run, with the romance as the particular attraction. Choose it for the courtship, and keep expectations of novelty modest.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
7
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are uniformly positive about Carolina Caroline, with praise centred on Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner’s chemistry. Most critics find that their romance gives a familiar lovers-on-the-run story enough warmth and sincerity to feel fresh. The leads’ tenderness, humour and shared sense of damage draw particular attention, while the Southern settings and gritty Americana also earn approval. Several reviews value the film’s smaller, sadder approach to an often flamboyant genre.

The spread is narrow, with differences chiefly about how far the performances carry the familiar premise. Familiarity is the recurring qualification, though most critics treat it as something the actors overcome rather than a serious weakness. Collider offers the clearest reservation, finding the colourful visuals, country music and high-energy scenes more successful than the serious passages and conclusion. There is no outright dissent among these seven reviews; the variation is in enthusiasm rather than recommendation.

RogerEbert.com
5 June 2026 · Sheila O'Malley
85*

The critic praises the film's strong lead chemistry and sincere take on a familiar lovers-on-the-run story. She singles out the tender, funny dynamic between the two leads as what elevates the material.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 June 2026 · Critic's Pick · Beatrice Loayza
79*

The review calls the film a deceptively familiar but sincere lovers-on-the-lam story buoyed by its magnetic stars. It highlights the soulful sincerity and the way the central romance revitalizes the classic premise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 June 2026 · B · Natalia Keogan
77

A charming Bonnie and Clyde-style tale of doomed lovers scamming across the South in dive bars and motels. The film stands out for its gritty Americana, strong lead chemistry between Weaving and Gallner, and down-to-earth take on familiar lovers-on-the-run tropes.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
2 June 2026 · Vikram Murthi
75*

Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner’s passionate chemistry elevates a familiar lovers-on-the-run story. Director Adam Carter Rehmeier’s skill with actors helps make the archetypal feel fresh and exciting.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 June 2026 · Guy Lodge
75*

The critic finds the film a pleasurable, star-driven B-movie update of the lovers-on-the-run genre thanks to its leads' instant chemistry. He singles out the electric connection between Weaving and Gallner as what gives the familiar story an active heart rate.

Read the full review →
Collider
19 September 2025 · festival review · Therese Lacson
80*

The film is a flashy, colorful update on the Bonnie and Clyde outlaw romance archetype, powered by the electric chemistry and standout performances of Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner. It excels in its high-energy, fun moments with strong Americana visuals and country music but stumbles a bit with its more serious scenes and conclusion.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Carolina Caroline worth watching?
Carolina Caroline is worth watching for fans of lovers-on-the-run romances, and we score it 79. Samara Weaving and Kyle Gallner’s funny, tender partnership is the main attraction; we recommend it for the courtship rather than the familiar crimes, with a caveat that the heavier drama is less persuasive.
How long is Carolina Caroline, and what is it rated?
Carolina Caroline runs 1h 47m. It is a crime and drama film.
Where can I watch Carolina Caroline in Switzerland?
Carolina Caroline is not on any streaming or rental service in Switzerland at the moment. It is available in 2 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Carolina Caroline, and is it suitable for children?
Carolina Caroline has a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. The certificate indicates adult material, but the review does not specify the strength or frequency of violence, frightening scenes or other content, so we cannot offer a more precise warning for sensitive viewers.
How does Carolina Caroline compare to Bonnie and Clyde?
Carolina Caroline is the gentler romantic choice beside Bonnie and Clyde, which we favour for its sharper, more forceful treatment of outlaw attraction and recklessness. Both mix crime with humour, but Carolina Caroline earns its recommendation through tenderness between its leads; Bonnie and Clyde has the stronger claim on viewers seeking shocks and distinctive editing.
What should I watch after Carolina Caroline?
After Carolina Caroline, try Bonnie and Clyde (1967, Fi1m 88): For an outlaw romance that makes attraction and recklessness inseparable. Then Badlands (1973, Fi1m 91): For a colder, more unsettling account of young lovers fleeing violence.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Bonnie and Clyde (1967, Fi1m 88)For an outlaw romance that makes attraction and recklessness inseparable.

  2. Gun Crazy (1950) · not on Fi1m yetFor criminal lovers whose attraction makes every sensible decision harder.

  3. Badlands (1973, Fi1m 91)For a colder, more unsettling account of young lovers fleeing violence.

  4. Queen & Slim (2019) · not on Fi1m yetFor a fugitive romance shaped by the country surrounding its couple.

  5. The Getaway (1972) · not on Fi1m yetFor a criminal couple whose escape depends on an uneasy marriage.

Carolina Caroline (2026) review: Warm leads in a familiar romance (Switzerland) | Fi1m