Warden Bernadine Williams (Alfre Woodard) stands beside a person lying on a bed
Film review

Clemency

2019 · Directed by Chinonye Chukwu · 1h 52m

In a sentenceAlfre Woodard makes holding herself together look like the hardest job in the prison

Warden Bernadine Williams (Alfre Woodard) oversees executions in an American prison, where she is preparing for the execution of Anthony Woods (Aldis Hodge). Her duties bring her into contact with the prisoner and include explaining the drugs used in the execution procedure. Bernadine tries to keep her professional composure as the work takes a growing toll on her. Her husband, Jonathan Williams (Wendell Pierce), feels the strain within their marriage. While Anthony waits for his scheduled execution, Bernadine struggles to carry on doing the job she is responsible for.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Alfre Woodard makes Clemency a painful, persuasive drama about the work of carrying out executions. Chinonye Chukwu gives her actors room, though a sluggish middle stretch tests our patience with an otherwise affecting film.

Chinonye Chukwu’s Clemency is a difficult film to recommend for a quiet evening, but we recommend it. Its account of a prison warden administering the death penalty is strongest when Alfre Woodard has almost nothing to say. Writing and directing, Chukwu asks us to consider what repeated participation in executions does to someone expected to remain competent and composed. She also keeps the condemned man’s suffering in view. The film sometimes labours its point, but Woodard makes Bernadine’s determination to carry on credible and painful to watch.

Woodard plays Warden Bernadine Williams as someone for whom showing distress would amount to a failure at work. Her face and posture suggest the effort of keeping a professional manner, without asking us to congratulate Bernadine for enduring it. We found the exchanges with Aldis Hodge’s Anthony Woods hard to bear, particularly the explanation of the execution drugs. Woodard makes the explanation sound like a duty Bernadine knows how to perform, while Hodge gives us the terror of being the person receiving it.

Eric Branco’s cinematography gives Woodard’s face the attention it needs, and the visual restraint suits an actor who can hold us without a speech. Margaux Rust’s production design is similarly unobtrusive. The prison surroundings do their job without competing with the people, keeping our attention on the discomfort of these encounters. That plainness is useful: the procedure is disturbing enough without the setting telling us how to feel about it.

Phyllis Housen’s editing is generous to the actors, allowing the discomfort of an exchange to persist rather than hurrying us towards the next development. This is often exactly right for Woodard and Hodge. Across the middle section, however, the patience becomes a problem: we have understood Bernadine’s distress well before the film finishes showing us its extent. Kathryn Bostic’s music supports the sombre mood effectively, but it cannot supply the movement missing from these passages.

The strain on Bernadine’s marriage should give those passages another direction, and Wendell Pierce brings welcome feeling to Jonathan Williams. Yet Jonathan too often seems to have been written chiefly to demonstrate the damage his wife’s job causes at home. The domestic material gives us another measure of her unhappiness without giving their relationship quite enough life of its own. The writing is more convincing when Bernadine and Anthony have to deal directly with each other.

Within the prison-drama tradition, the choice to give so much attention to the warden could easily leave the condemned man serving as a lesson for someone else. Hodge prevents that. His distress makes Anthony a person we remain concerned about, even when Bernadine’s difficulty doing her work occupies the centre of the film. Chukwu’s interest in the people carrying out executions is worth pursuing, but our sympathy for them should never make their predicament seem equal to that of the person facing death.

Clemency works best when it leaves us with that unequal encounter and lets its actors make us uncomfortable. Its slower passages ask for more patience than they repay. We would still make time for Woodard and Hodge, whose scenes together make the prospect of execution painfully immediate. Choose it for an evening when there is room to sit with something difficult, rather than as a way of shaking off the working day.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
14
Mixed
6
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Clemency as a sober, affecting examination of the human cost of capital punishment. Praise centres on Alfre Woodard’s restrained performance as the prison warden, particularly the small physical details that reveal the strain beneath her professional composure. Aldis Hodge also draws praise for his emotional depth. The favourable reviews value Chinonye Chukwu’s measured direction and the attention paid to how executions affect those involved.

Reservations concern pacing and how plainly the film delivers its themes, with even some admirers finding the middle section drawn out. The spread is wide: Variety finds the drama moving but argues that uncertainty about the prisoner’s guilt muddles its message, while Eye for Film objects to overly explicit storytelling. The Wrap offers the sharpest dissent, finding the restraint emotionally distancing and the central character underdeveloped, despite praising Hodge. The performances earn broader agreement than the storytelling.

IndieWire
28 January 2019 · A- · Eric Kohn
90

Kohn praises the film as a haunting, mature prison drama, while noting that its middle section drags. He singles out Alfre Woodard’s brilliant performance as the film’s central force.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 December 2019 · Justin Chang
90*

Chang praises the film as a gripping, powerfully bleak work of American realism. He singles out Alfre Woodard’s transfixing performance and the emotional depth she and Aldis Hodge bring to their brief exchanges.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
17 July 2020
90*

The critic finds the film a powerful, clear-eyed examination of America’s death penalty and the injustice it perpetuates. They single out Alfre Woodard’s restrained, phenomenal performance as the warden for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 July 2020 · Pamela Hutchinson
85*

Hutchinson praises the film as a powerful, morally forceful drama about the human toll of executions. She singles out Alfre Woodard’s subtle, affecting performance and the film’s quiet, economical storytelling.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
28 January 2019 · festival review · David Rooney
85*

Rooney finds the film engrossing and affecting, though somewhat drawn out, and sees it as a measured advocacy drama. He especially praises Alfre Woodard’s restrained, deeply felt performance as the burdened prison warden.

Read the full review →
Vulture
17 January 2020 · Angelica Jade Bastién
85*

Bastién gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it an actors’ showcase and praising its emotional intelligence. She singles out Alfre Woodard’s finely detailed performance, especially the expressive work of her face and body.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Clemency worth watching?
Clemency is worth watching for Alfre Woodard and Aldis Hodge’s painful encounters between a prison warden and a condemned man; we score it 81 out of 100. We recommend it for an evening when a demanding drama feels welcome, though the sluggish middle and underwritten marriage scenes require patience.
How long is Clemency, and what is it rated?
Clemency runs 1h 52m. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Clemency in Indonesia?
Clemency is not on any streaming or rental service in Indonesia at the moment. It is available in 12 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Clemency, and is it suitable for children?
Clemency has a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children; its account of execution makes it a distressing choice for sensitive viewers. We find the explanation of execution drugs and the condemned man’s terror particularly hard to bear, so older teenagers and adults should expect difficult death-penalty material rather than light prison drama.
How does Clemency compare to Dead Man Walking?
Clemency shares Dead Man Walking’s reliance on difficult human encounters to explore capital punishment, but concentrates on a warden’s struggle to keep doing her job. We recommend both for their performances: Dead Man Walking occasionally makes its debate feel too arranged, while Clemency tests our patience with its middle stretch but rewards an interest in the work of carrying out executions.
What should I watch after Clemency?
After Clemency, try Dead Man Walking (1995, Fi1m 84): Another death-penalty drama that lets difficult human encounters carry the moral questions. Then The Assistant (2019, Fi1m 81): Workplace routine becomes quietly frightening, with another lead performance built from suppressed reactions; and 12 Angry Men (1957, Fi1m 91): For a more talkative examination of the responsibility involved in deciding another person’s fate.

Cast

Awards

Sundance Film Festival U.S. Dramatic Grand Jury Prize Award, 2019

Won
Sundance Film Festival U.S. Dramatic Grand Jury Prize Award

If you liked this, try…

  1. Dead Man Walking (1995, Fi1m 84)Another death-penalty drama that lets difficult human encounters carry the moral questions.

  2. A Short Film About Killing (1988) · not reviewed yetA harsher examination of killing and punishment, with little comfort in either.

  3. The Chambermaid (2018) · not reviewed yetPatient attention to a woman’s working routine reveals pressures she rarely voices.

  4. The Assistant (2019, Fi1m 81)Workplace routine becomes quietly frightening, with another lead performance built from suppressed reactions.

  5. 12 Angry Men (1957, Fi1m 91)For a more talkative examination of the responsibility involved in deciding another person’s fate.