Young shepherd boy with staff stands between two goats on rocky hillside at sunset
Film review

David

2025 · Directed by Phil Cunningham, Brent Dawes · 1h 49m · OFLC PG

In a sentenceThe animation gets warmer notices than the people inside it

David is an animated family drama and adventure directed by Phil Cunningham and Brent Dawes. Brandon Engman voices Young David, with Brian Stivale as Samuel, Hector as Jesse and Miri Mesika as Nitzevet. The voice cast also includes Shahar Tavoch as Ozem, Aaron Tavaler as Nethanel, Jack Wagman as Abinadab and Jonathan Shaboo as Eliab. Katie Bernstein voices Ahinoam, while Lauren Daigle voices Rebecca. Dawes writes the screenplay, Tom Scott edits and Joseph Trapanese supplies the music. The film runs 109 minutes and carries a PG certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The available critical accounts suggest accomplished animation but disagree about whether the film earns our affection. Our provisional assessment is mixed: reported visual care gives it appeal, but concerns about the drama prevent a recommendation.

Our provisional verdict on David is mixed: an animated family musical with persuasive reports of visual care, but a substantial complaint that it feels generic and emotionally remote. That is enough to acknowledge its craft without recommending it. This assessment rests on the available critical accounts rather than a viewing. The animation and songs offer reasons to be interested, though the disagreement about their emotional effect matters more than the polish.

Phil Cunningham and Brent Dawes direct, with Dawes also credited for the screenplay. The clearest shared praise concerns the animation: the critical accounts describe polished images, with particular attention to textiles and the staging of action within the frame. We were heartened by that reported care over cloth and staging, because it suggests thought about what will hold our attention beyond the next plot event. Those are useful specifics, pointing to care over both surfaces and how the audience follows a scene. They give us a stronger reason to be interested than a general assurance that the film looks expensive.

The disagreement becomes sharper around the music and feeling. One account finds the songs catchy and well integrated, and responds warmly to the film’s sincerity; another finds the experience generic and emotionally remote despite the quality of the images. We would give that disagreement more weight than a simple average of the scores, because it concerns what a family musical needs to accomplish throughout its running time. Attractive animation can sustain attention, but songs also need to make the people singing them worth following. The available accounts do not agree that David manages that.

Joseph Trapanese is credited with music, while Tom Scott is the editor. Those credits identify their contributions without telling us which musical choices work, how individual sequences are paced or where the film might drag. It would be easy to turn the praise for songs into a claim about Trapanese’s score, but those are different judgements. Equally, a running time of 109 minutes tells us nothing reliable about Scott’s handling of a scene. Neither credit supplies the missing evidence for a detailed craft assessment.

Brandon Engman voices Young David, Brian Stivale voices Samuel and Hector voices Jesse, with Miri Mesika as Nitzevet and Lauren Daigle as Rebecca. The available critical summaries give us no performance detail substantial enough to judge their work individually. We therefore cannot fairly praise one performer for warmth or blame another for a character who fails to register. For the same reason, assigning particular strengths or weaknesses to Dawes’s dialogue would go beyond what these accounts establish.

Our provisional score gives weight to the reported visual finish and musical appeal, both substantial virtues in a family musical. Sincerity is also a reasonable ambition, and a film should not be marked down simply for wanting to move its audience plainly. But the complaint that David feels generic and emotionally remote concerns something essential, and praise for finely rendered textiles does not answer it. The balance supports a mixed judgement rather than a dismissal: there is enough craft here to warrant interest, but insufficient evidence of satisfying drama to warrant our recommendation. An appetite for polished animation would need to carry the evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
1
Mixed
1
Negative
1
RogerEbert.com
64*

The URL identifies this as a review, but the page was blocked, so its verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is available in the supplied text.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 December 2025 · Guy Lodge
40*

The critic finds the film competently made but too generic and emotionally unstirring. He praises its richly realized animation, especially the detailed textiles and visual staging.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
75*

The critic finds the animated musical heartfelt and broadly successful, despite a few minor drawbacks. They particularly praise its polished visuals and catchy, well-integrated songs.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is David worth watching?
David earns a provisional 58/100 from us: reports of polished animation give it appeal for animation enthusiasts, but we cannot recommend it on the available critical accounts. Our assessment rests on those accounts rather than a viewing, and their disagreement over whether the songs and characters engage our feelings leaves too much doubt about the drama.
How long is David, and what is it rated?
David runs 1h 49m and is rated PG by the OFLC in New Zealand. It is an animation and family film.
Where can I watch David in New Zealand?
David is not on any streaming or rental service in New Zealand at the moment. It is available in 18 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does David compare to The Prince of Egypt?
David is the less persuasive choice beside The Prince of Egypt, which we recommend for songs that give its conflicts room to develop and central relationships that hurt. Our assessment of David rests on critical accounts praising its animation but disputing its emotional pull; The Prince of Egypt offers stronger dramatic reasons to watch, despite formulaic songs and misplaced comic priests.
What should I watch after David?
After David, try The Prince of Egypt (1998, Fi1m 74): Biblical animation with songs that give its conflicts room to develop. Then The Secret of Kells (2009, Fi1m 76): Faith, fear and artistic work meet in an Irish animated adventure; and Song of the Sea (2014, Fi1m 82): Family grief and Irish folklore handled with patience, music and feeling.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Prince of Egypt (1998, Fi1m 74)Biblical animation with songs that give its conflicts room to develop.

  2. The Miracle Maker (2000) · not on Fi1m yetA stop-motion account of Jesus, attentive to the people around him.

  3. The Secret of Kells (2009, Fi1m 76)Faith, fear and artistic work meet in an Irish animated adventure.

  4. Kirikou and the Sorceress (1998) · not on Fi1m yetA small hero challenges formidable power through curiosity and stubborn courage.

  5. Song of the Sea (2014, Fi1m 82)Family grief and Irish folklore handled with patience, music and feeling.

David (2025) review: Polished animation with a divided response (New Zealand) | Fi1m