Peter Quill (Chris Pratt) and Mantis (Pom Klementieff) leading the team through a spaceship corridor
Film review

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

2023 · Directed by James Gunn · 2h 30m · ΓΓΤΕ K12

In a sentenceA 12A about animal experimentation, and the animal experimentation is the best thing in it

The Guardians have settled on Knowhere, which they now run as a town of sorts. Peter Quill (Chris Pratt) is drinking and grieving a Gamora (Zoe Saldaña) who, in this version of her, has never met him and does not care to. Then a golden being called Adam Warlock (Will Poulter) drops out of the sky, sent by Ayesha (Elizabeth Debicki), and leaves Rocket (Bradley Cooper) close to death. A device in Rocket’s chest makes surgery impossible, so Nebula (Karen Gillan), Drax (Dave Bautista), Mantis (Pom Klementieff) and Groot (Vin Diesel) set out to find the override code, a search that leads towards the man who made him, the High Evolutionary (Chukwudi Iwuji).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Gunn’s farewell to the Guardians gives Rocket a past so cruel it stopped us cold, then builds a loud, funny, overlong rescue around it. The villain shouts and the middle sags, but the raccoon earns every minute he is given.

James Gunn ends his trilogy by taking the joke seriously. Rocket, the raccoon with the guns and the mouth, has been the punchline since 2014; this film asks where he came from and answers in detail, and the answer is not a kind one. Around that it wraps a rescue mission, a golden idiot, a shouting scientist and 150 minutes, which is a good half hour more than the story needs. It is the best of the three and it is also the longest, and the length costs it.

Here is what we felt. The first time the film cut away to Rocket’s past, a small animal in a cage in a bright room, we stopped laughing and did not start again for some minutes. We had not expected a Marvel film to upset us, and it did, and we were slightly resentful about it. Gunn shoots these scenes without decoration: white light, steel, animals talking to each other in the dark after the men have gone. Sean Gunn voices the young Rocket and Bradley Cooper the grown one, and neither plays it for pity. Cooper’s work here is the best acting in the series, done by a man we never see.

Chukwudi Iwuji plays the High Evolutionary at full volume from his first scene, a man who builds worlds, judges them imperfect and burns them, and who wants nothing except to be right. It is one note, but the note is hateful, and the film needs him hated more than it needs him understood. Beth Mickle’s production design gives him places to be hateful in: an orbiting headquarters built of flesh, with corridors like intestines and doors that pucker instead of opening, and a suburb where animal-human hybrids drive estate cars and watch television. Henry Braham lights it in hot pinks and sick yellows, and the crew go in wearing Judianna Makovsky’s padded, sweet-wrapper spacesuits, so the frame looks like a bag of pick-and-mix dropped in an abattoir. We mean that as praise.

The cutting is the trouble. Three editors are credited, Fred Raskin, Tatiana S. Riegel and Greg D’Auria, and the film moves like something settled at a meeting. The flashbacks land exactly where they should; the present-day plot between them doubles back, stops for fights nobody asked for, and in the middle hour repeatedly reaches the end of a scene and then carries on. Will Poulter’s Adam Warlock, a golden man-child who hits first and thinks never, is funny in every scene he has and has hardly any, and the film keeps mislaying him in a way that suggests he is here because a contract said so. John Murphy’s score is capable and mostly buried under the pop songs, which are, as before, the film’s real music; only in Rocket’s past does a quiet piano line get room to work.

Chris Pratt’s Quill is drunk, sad and less funny than before, and that is the point. His scenes with Zoe Saldaña, playing a Gamora who owes him nothing and says so, are the most grown-up writing in the film: a man trying to pick up a relationship with a woman who was never in it. Dave Bautista and Pom Klementieff are the double act, Drax’s cheerful literalism against Mantis’s worn-out patience, and whenever the plot stalls Gunn sends them off together to be stupid, and it works every time. Karen Gillan’s Nebula spends the film as the only adult aboard, snapping at everyone. There is a corridor fight late on, staged as one long moving shot with the whole team in it, that is the best piece of action the series has managed, and we grinned through all of it.

The first Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) got away with its sentiment by never resting on it. Vol. 2 (2017) rested on it and went sticky. This one earns its sentiment and then keeps asking for more: the closing stretch goes on well past the point it has made, and somewhere in it we were looking at our watch, and felt rotten about it, given what the film had done to us an hour earlier.

The reviews have mostly been warm, and we are with them on the raccoon and against them on the length. See it, and if you have children, or a dog, know that the flashbacks are harder than a 12A usually allows. At home you can pause it, which helps, both for the length and for the flashbacks. It runs 150 minutes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

70
Positive
11
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics are pleased with this third and final Guardians film, and the praise clusters in the same places. Rocket’s backstory is the element named again and again: several reviews call it the emotional core, and a few find it moving to the point of distress. Dave Bautista’s Drax is the performance singled out most often, with Mantis, Groot and newcomer Will Poulter close behind. James Gunn’s creature and production design is credited with keeping the film distinct from the run of comic-book films around it.

The reservations cluster on length. Even warm reviews call it overlong, and a few think the emotion is laid on too thick and the tone lurches between quips and gore. The spread is wide: alongside a cluster of raves sit two firm dissents. The Telegraph finds the heroes a spent force in a messy plot, and The New Yorker thinks it visually dull, simulating feeling rather than earning it.

The Independent
4 May 2023 · Clarisse Loughrey
90*

The critic calls it the best Marvel movie in years and a reminder that the Guardians represent some of the very best the MCU has to offer. She singles out the well-drawn, textured characters and the care with which their story is told.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 April 2023 · Helen O'Hara
85*

The critic hails it as a triumph that closes out the trilogy with a big, scrappy mix of humour and terror boasting a heart as big as Drax. She singles out the emotionally resonant storytelling and the way it allows the characters to face their fears and grow.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3 May 2023 · ★★★★
80

The critic deems it a fitting conclusion to the saga that wraps things up nicely despite some narrative sags and over-egged emotion. Standout elements include the scene-stealing performances from Drax, Mantis and Groot alongside strong additions like Will Poulter.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
28 April 2023
80*

James Gunn delivers a satisfying send-off in this final Guardians chapter that feels refreshingly vivid and distinct amid formulaic comic-book films. The review highlights the moving backstory for Rocket and the film's emotional wallop alongside its gorgeous spectacle.

Read the full review →
The Times
28 April 2023 · Kevin Maher
80*

The critic praises the dramatically focused threequel with a dark and demented heart that hits just enough Guardians beats to please the faithful without the self-referential excess of Vol 2. Rocket's storyline and the structure of heist and rescues are highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
28 April 2023 · ★★★/4 · Brian Tallerico
75

The critic praises Gunn for balancing corporate demands with personal filmmaking and highlights the creativity, dialogue, and performances that set it apart from other superhero movies. Rocket's origin story and the film's messier, weirder elements are singled out as particularly appealing.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 worth watching?
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is worth watching, and we scored it 71, the best of James Gunn's three but also the longest and looser for it. Rocket's past is the reason to see it: the flashbacks upset us more than we expected a Marvel film to manage. The villain shouts and the middle hour sags, so it suits fans of the series more than newcomers wanting a quick evening.
How long is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, and what is it rated?
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 runs 2h 30m and is rated K12 by the ΓΓΤΕ in Greece. It is a science fiction and adventure film.
Where can I watch Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 in Greece?
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is streaming on Disney+ in Greece. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, and is it suitable for children?
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is a 12A, but the flashbacks to Rocket's past, a small animal in a cage in a bright laboratory, are harder than that certificate usually allows. There is plenty of loud comic action, a villain who burns whole worlds and a headquarters built of flesh. Older children who know the series should cope; younger ones, and anyone tender about animals, may not.
How does Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 compare to Paddington 2?
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 and Paddington 2 both hang a story on a small animal, a found family and a villain enjoying himself, but the Paddington film is kinder, shorter and the tighter of the two. Gunn's film hits harder, with Rocket's origin doing things a family comedy would never attempt, and then outstays its point. For a family evening, Paddington; for a proper wallop, the raccoon.
What should I watch after Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3?
After Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, try Paddington 2 (2017, Fi1m 91): A small animal, a found family and a villain having enormous fun; kinder, and shorter. Then Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984, Fi1m 85): Miyazaki’s giant insects are more sympathetic than most of his people, and he means it.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2024

Nominated
Best Visual Effects

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2024

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Plague Dogs (1982) · not reviewed yetTwo dogs escape a laboratory; the film Rocket’s flashbacks most resemble, and far bleaker.

  2. Paddington 2 (2017, Fi1m 91)A small animal, a found family and a villain having enormous fun; kinder, and shorter.

  3. Galaxy Quest (1999) · not reviewed yetA crew of misfits mistaken for heroes; the jokes land first and the feeling follows.

  4. Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984, Fi1m 85)Miyazaki’s giant insects are more sympathetic than most of his people, and he means it.

  5. The Suicide Squad (2021) · not reviewed yetGunn’s other team of expendables: nastier, funnier and mercifully briefer than this one.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever