A man stands on a staircase amid oversized paper cutouts in a dim room
Film review

High Spirits

1988 · Directed by Neil Jordan · 1h 39m

In a sentenceA holiday romance with a ghost, interrupted by almost everyone else on the cast list

An American on holiday falls for a ghost, turning the prospect of romance into a problem with no ordinary solution. Jack Crawford (Steve Guttenberg) and Mary Plunkett (Daryl Hannah) are the central pair, with Peter Plunkett (Peter O’Toole) and Sharon Brogan Crawford (Beverly D’Angelo) caught up in the surrounding complications. Miranda (Jennifer Tilly) and Brother Tony (Peter Gallagher) also feature. The lovers try to bridge the distance between the living and the dead while other entanglements develop around them.

Fi1m review

Peter O’Toole and an elaborate ghostly setting provide some pleasure, but Neil Jordan’s comedy cannot keep its scattered stories in order. The romance has warmth; the film keeps finding reasons to leave it alone.

Neil Jordan’s High Spirits has enough warmth and visual imagination to make its muddle frustrating, but not enough good comedy to recommend it. Neil Jordan writes and directs a supernatural farce built around the complications of an American’s romance with a ghost. There is room in that idea for both silliness and sadness, and the film occasionally finds both. Too often, though, it wanders away from the people who might make either feeling matter.

Peter O’Toole is the chief reason to persevere. As Peter Plunkett, he supplies comic conviction that the surrounding story often lacks, making its whimsy seem worth indulging for a little longer. We do not need every joke to be clever when a performer can give the foolishness this much purpose. The trouble is how readily the film leaves him for another subplot, as though the cast list were a rota.

Steve Guttenberg and Daryl Hannah also give it something worth keeping. As Jack Crawford and Mary Plunkett, they have enough rapport to make the supernatural romance more than a complication to be explained. Their attraction is the part we want the film to stay with, because it gives us a reason to care what happens beyond the next joke. The romance remains thinly written, however, and their chemistry cannot supply all the development the script leaves out.

Alex Thomson’s cinematography and Anton Furst’s production design offer a persuasive reason to keep looking even when the jokes are struggling. The elaborate physical surroundings give the ghost story substance, and its darker passages suggest a sadder film than the broad comedy generally allows. We were briefly moved by the ghostly couple’s dancing. The tenderness there works because the film stops treating the lovers chiefly as a source of comic complications and gives their unhappiness some room.

Michael Bradsell’s editing has to contend with a script that keeps adding distractions to an already slight central story. Individual scenes can be agreeable, but their accumulation does not produce much comic momentum. George Fenton’s music does not settle the competing demands of romance and farce, though that is asking a score to solve a writing problem. At 99 minutes, the film still finds time for diversions that interrupt its better scenes, with each change of emphasis asking us to begin caring again.

Supernatural comedy can accommodate a surprising amount of sadness, provided the living and the dead have clear reasons for bothering each other. Here the romantic possibilities are more convincing than the comic plotting built around them. Neil Jordan seems interested in the hurt beneath the fantasy, yet too much of the film is spent attending to comic business that does not deepen it. Admirers of Peter O’Toole may find enough pleasure to forgive the diversions. Anyone coming chiefly for a ghostly romance should expect frequent interruptions.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

46
Positive
0
Mixed
4
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards mixed or negative, with praise concentrated on individual performances and the physical production rather than the comedy as a whole. Peter O’Toole earns approval for his comic performance, while the chemistry between Steve Guttenberg and Daryl Hannah gives the romance some depth. The elaborate production and darker supernatural touches also find admirers. Even among the less persuaded critics, there is recognition of occasional poetry in the ghostly romance.

The main reservations concern a slender plot, scattered subplots and humour that works only intermittently. The spread runs from qualified enjoyment to outright dismissal, though none of the recorded assessments is wholly positive. Radio Times finds enough easy laughs to enjoy despite the crowded storytelling. At the harsher end, Time Out’s available assessment dismisses the film and faults its treatment of the love affair between Ireland and Hollywood.

The New York Times
18 November 1988
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No praised or criticized element can be identified from the available page text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones finds the comedy manages its whimsical, easy laughs despite a slender plot. He praises Peter O’Toole’s performance but says the many scattered subplots prevent full comic satisfaction.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1987 · Variety Staff
55*

The critic finds the supernatural whimsy uneven, with its quality rising and falling from moment to moment. They praise its appealing dark underpinnings and elaborate physical production.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
18 November 1988 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
45*

Wilmington finds the film a fragmented, overblown comedy whose flashes of poetry cannot overcome its misjudged conventions. He praises its visual splendor and the lyrical moments in the ghostly couple’s dance of death.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
35*

Thomas finds the film briefly entertaining but ultimately forgettable and disappointing. He singles out the chemistry between Steve Guttenberg and Daryl Hannah as giving the comedy some depth.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· SGr
15*

The review’s available description calls the film dreadful. It faults the film’s treatment of the love affair between Ireland and Hollywood.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is High Spirits worth watching?
High Spirits offers some pleasure for Peter O’Toole admirers, but we find it too scattered to recommend generally and score it 52 out of 100. O’Toole’s comic conviction, the elaborate ghostly setting and a warm central romance help, but weak jokes and distracting subplots keep interrupting what works.
How long is High Spirits, and what is it rated?
High Spirits runs 1h 39m. It is a fantasy and comedy film.
Where can I watch High Spirits in Malaysia?
High Spirits is not on any streaming or rental service in Malaysia at the moment. It is available in 14 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is High Spirits, and is it suitable for children?
High Spirits has a UK 15 certificate, making it unsuitable for children under 15 despite its fantasy-comedy premise. The ghostly romance includes darker passages, but we cannot give a specific warning about violence or the intensity of its scares; the certificate is the clearest guide for families.
How does High Spirits compare to The Ghost and Mrs. Muir?
High Spirits is the broader, busier comedy; we recommend The Ghost and Mrs. Muir as the more persuasive supernatural romance. The latter gives its lovers’ separation more attention and earns its tenderness, though its leisurely pace needs patience. High Spirits offers elaborate surroundings and Peter O’Toole’s comic conviction, but keeps leaving its romance for less rewarding subplots.
What should I watch after High Spirits?
After High Spirits, try The Ghost and Mrs. Muir (1947, Fi1m 84): A quieter supernatural romance, with more patience for what separates its lovers. Then A Chinese Ghost Story (1987, Fi1m 82): For supernatural romance willing to let its comedy sit beside real sorrow; and Beetlejuice (1988, Fi1m 83): A more assured supernatural comedy that makes its elaborate surroundings earn their keep.

Cast

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress, 1989

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. Blithe Spirit (1945) · not reviewed yetGhostly interference exposes marital grievances, with sharper comic manners and more disciplined plotting.

  2. The Ghost and Mrs. Muir (1947, Fi1m 84)A quieter supernatural romance, with more patience for what separates its lovers.

  3. A Chinese Ghost Story (1987, Fi1m 82)For supernatural romance willing to let its comedy sit beside real sorrow.

  4. Beetlejuice (1988, Fi1m 83)A more assured supernatural comedy that makes its elaborate surroundings earn their keep.

  5. Extra Ordinary (2019) · not reviewed yetIrish supernatural comedy with a firmer grasp of the people beneath the paranormal fuss.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever