Film review

Honeyland

2019 · Directed by Ljubomir Stefanov, Tamara Kotevska · 1h 29m

In a sentenceHalf for the bees, half for the beekeeper; the neighbours arrive and cannot count to half

Documentary

In an empty village in the hills of North Macedonia, Hatidzhe Muratova keeps wild bees in the crevices of a cliff and the stone walls of ruined houses, taking half the honey and leaving half for the hive. She lives with her mother, Nazife Muratova, who is bedridden and nearly blind, in a house without electricity, and takes the bus to Skopje to sell her honey by the jar. Then Hussein Sam and Ljutvie Sam arrive next door with a caravan, a herd of cattle and a large family of children. Hussein wants money, sees what the bees bring in, and decides to keep some of his own. Hatidzhe teaches the children her rule and hopes their father has heard it.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Kotevska and Stefanov’s documentary about a lone beekeeper in the Macedonian hills is patient, plainly shot and quietly furious. It is cut to play like a drama and hides the seams too well, but the woman at its centre is worth every minute.

Hatidzhe Muratova keeps bees in an empty village in the hills of North Macedonia. She lifts the honeycomb out of a crack in a cliff with her bare hands, takes half and leaves half, and tells the bees so out loud. At home, in a stone house with no electricity, she looks after her mother, Nazife Muratova, who is bedridden and nearly blind. Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov filmed the two of them without narration, interviews or captions, and then a family arrived next door, and their film acquired a plot. It is a fine film, and we recommend it with one reservation about how that plot was made.

Fejmi Daut and Samir Ljuma shot it, and the opening is theirs: a small figure in a yellow headscarf crossing a ridge, then edging along a ledge to a hive set into the rock, the valley falling away beneath her. They stay close to Hatidzhe and closer to the bees, which crawl over her wrists and face and never seem to sting her. Indoors there is a single lamp, and Daut and Ljuma let it do the work, so the house is a circle of orange with the dark pressing in at the edges and Nazife’s face turned towards the light. Nothing is lit for the camera. When the sun goes, the picture goes with it.

Hatidzhe is a marvellous subject, and she knows it. She takes the bus to Skopje with jars of honey, argues the price up at a market stall, and spends some of the money on chestnut hair dye. She sings. She talks to her mother about the men who once came calling and were sent away, and asks, not quite as a joke, whether it might have gone differently. That conversation moved us more than we expected, because she puts the question so lightly, and Nazife answers it so flatly, and the film simply sits there with the two of them and the lamp. Nobody prompts anyone. We had the sense of eavesdropping on people who had long since forgotten the camera.

The neighbours are Hussein Sam and Ljutvie Sam, who arrive with a caravan, a herd of cattle and more children than the village has seen in years. Kotevska and Stefanov do not make them villains, and this is the film’s best decision. Hussein has mouths to feed and a buyer leaning on him for honey, and he takes up bees because his neighbour is doing well out of them. Hatidzhe teaches the children, scolds the parents and is plainly glad of the company. We liked the Sams and we dreaded them, both at once, and that is not a comfortable way to watch a film. What happens when Hussein starts to take more than half is the second half, and we will not describe it.

Our reservation is about the shape. Atanas Georgiev edited the footage into something with a first act, a rising middle and a last reel, and he has done it so cleanly that you could mistake it for a scripted drama with amateur actors. That is a compliment to his cutting and a problem for the film. We have no idea how long the cameras were there, how many seasons pass, or what the crew did when a child was crying next to an open hive. Nobody is asked anything, so nothing is explained, and the Sams’ side of the ledger, what they owe and to whom, is glimpsed rather than shown. Once or twice we caught ourselves wondering what had been cut to make the story this tidy, and a documentary should not make you wonder that. Foltin’s music arrives sparingly, mostly late, and it is the one place where the film tells you what to feel.

Set against the run of observational documentaries that follow one person through a hard year, this is among the sharpest, because it has a villain of sorts and refuses to treat him as one. It is also short: 89 minutes, certificate 12A, and hardly a wasted shot. Watch it with the lights off and the phone in another room. It is quiet enough that any noise you make will feel like an intrusion.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

81
Positive
16
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Film Comment
1 March 2019
90*

The review presents Honeyland as an exemplary work of direct cinema and a moving ecological parable contrasting sustainable beekeeping with reckless exploitation. It singles out the rapturously beautiful images captured under difficult conditions for praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
29 January 2019 · festival review · Sheri Linden
90*

The critic praises the film's intimate portrayal of a traditional beekeeper's life and its themes of tradition, loneliness, and human-nature relationship, noting its universal resonance in an age of environmental crises. It highlights the exceptional access and vérité style as strengths, while pointing to the conflict with new neighbors as a key dramatic element.

Read the full review →
Empire
9 September 2019 · Helen O'Hara
85*

The critic finds the documentary a gorgeous, closely observed character study that plays like a thoughtful indie drama. It is praised for its intimate storytelling, stunning cinematography, and sensitive portrayal of a vanishing way of life through the expressive face and experiences of its central subject.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
28 March 2019 · David Ehrlich
85*

The review presents the film as a bitter and beautiful Sundance-winning documentary that focuses on a single beekeeper as though our collective future hinges on her hives, emphasizing environmental balance and the protagonist's central role.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 July 2019 · Justin Chang
85*

The film is a graceful evocation of interspecies coexistence that becomes a harrowing portrait of environmental and ethical imbalance when neighbors disrupt sustainable beekeeping practices.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 July 2019 · Monica Castillo
85*

The film meditates on the balance between humans and nature through the story of a solitary beekeeper whose world is disrupted by new neighbors who ignore her sustainable methods.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 2020

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

European Film Award for Best Documentary, 2019

Nominated
European Film Award for Best Documentary

Sundance Film Festival World Cinema Grand Jury Prize: Documentary, 2019

Won
Sundance Film Festival World Cinema Grand Jury Prize: Documentary

Sundance World Cinema Special Jury Prize Documentary, 2019

Won
Sundance World Cinema Special Jury Prize Documentary

If you liked this, try…

Gunda poster

Gunda

2020 · A sow and her piglets, no words, and more feeling than most scripted films manage.

Le Quattro Volte poster

Le Quattro Volte

2010 · A Calabrian goatherd, a tree and a kiln, filmed with the same patience and less plot.

The Gleaners and I poster

The Gleaners and I

2000 · Agnès Varda on people who live off what others leave behind, warm and unsentimental.

Sweetgrass poster

Sweetgrass

2009 · Montana sheepherders on a last drive through the mountains, swearing at the animals throughout.

Grey Gardens poster86

Grey Gardens

1975 · Another mother and daughter in a crumbling house, argued over ever since it was released.