Film review

Hope

2026 · Directed by Na Hong-jin · 2h 37m · MPA R

In a sentenceTwo and a half hours of alien pursuit, and somehow there is still time for a lecture

Science FictionMysteryAction

A rural community faces alien creatures, and the response involves chases by car, on horseback and on foot. Those caught in the danger have courage, but their attempts to survive also expose their lack of competence. Na Hong-jin writes and directs a science-fiction mystery that combines action with black comedy. Hwang Jung-min plays Go Bum-seok, Zo In-sung plays Go Sung-ki and Hoyeon plays Lim Sung-ae. The cast also includes Alicia Vikander as J’aur, Michael Fassbender as Ma’veyyo and Taylor Russell as Ai’dovor.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Na Hong-jin’s creature feature has enough wit and well-staged pursuit to make its excesses worth enduring. We recommend it for the action, with fair warning that the creatures are less convincing than the chases.

Hope is a good monster film that goes on too long. Na Hong-jin, who writes and directs, keeps finding comedy in the efforts of a rural community to survive encounters with alien creatures. These people can be brave and still make a mess of things. That gives the action a welcome unpredictability, though 157 minutes is more pursuit than the story can comfortably sustain.

Hong Kyung-pyo’s cinematography makes those pursuits worth the trouble. The car, horse and foot chases have a fluidity that keeps the movement interesting even when the basic business is simply getting away. We laughed at the characters’ fumbling attempts to cope, then found ourselves frightened for them during the car and horse chases. The grace of the filming does not soften the danger. Na’s staging keeps the comedy inside the action.

Lee Hwo-kyoung’s production design is particularly effective in the first hour, giving the small-town setting a prominence it loses as the chases accumulate. That early attention to the place helps the comedy by making the emergency feel like an interruption to ordinary life. Hoyeon, as Lim Sung-ae, stands out in an ensemble willing to look foolish. The performances take the peril seriously enough for the humour to work, even when the characters’ decisions are difficult to admire.

Kim Sun-min’s editing keeps the opening stretch moving without squeezing out its comic interruptions. Michael Abels’s score adds further urgency, and the combination makes even a long run of danger surprisingly easy to sit through at first. As the pursuits accumulate, though, the same speed begins to wear. The individual sequences remain exciting, but the film needs a stronger reason to keep sending us into another one. A shorter cut could have preserved the excitement without asking quite so much of it.

The creatures themselves are less dependable. The digital effects can look dated beside the confidence of the live-action staging, and this matters in a film that asks us to spend so long fearing them. Na also burdens the later stretches with explanations of the science-fiction mythology, making the film harder work just when it should be finding a fresh reason to press on. We will leave the particulars alone; it is the amount of explanation, and its effect on the pace, that disappoints.

As a creature feature, Hope is strongest when it lets practical problems occupy its characters: danger is immediate, and their responses are fallible enough to keep us interested. Its broad humour belongs in that situation, and Na deserves credit for resisting the temptation to make everyone efficient and solemn. The uneven effects and repeated pursuits are worth tolerating for action staged with this much care. Choose it for an evening when a great deal of running and a certain amount of foolishness sound appealing, and allow for a long one.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
11
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics greet Hope warmly, with praise clustering around Na Hong-jin’s action staging, dark humour and ability to keep a monster chase tense. The reviews repeatedly single out the first hour, where inventive stunts, small-town comedy and production design give the mayhem a setting worth exploring. Performances also earn approval, with Hoyeon singled out, though the choreography and camerawork attract the most consistent enthusiasm.

The reservations concern how long the film sustains that momentum: even favourable reviews find it overlong, with later stretches burdened by repetition and science-fiction explanations. Time Out is cooler, arguing that the early tension gives way to repetitive chases, while The New York Times finds the film more rewarding to consider than to watch despite admiring its craft. Digital effects divide opinion too: several critics find the creatures unconvincing, whereas Deadline praises the motion-capture work. The spread is chiefly between enthusiastic approval and qualified enjoyment.

Empire
10 September 2026 · Harry Stainer
85*

The critic calls it the most gonzo film of the year, an insane monster movie whose wild tonal shifts and relentless action sequences make it one of the year's most entertaining experiences. The leads, especially Hoyeon, stand out amid the mayhem, though imperfect CGI is noted as a caveat.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
20 May 2026 · festival review
85*

The critic praises Na Hong-jin's big swing into a maximalist monster movie full of breathtaking car, horse and foot chases. It is brilliantly crafted and exhilarating action cinema, though not quite at the level of Mad Max: Fury Road.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
19 May 2026 · festival review · Iana Murray
80*

The review highlights the rip-snorting creature feature's audacious stunts, fine action filmmaking and dark humour in a small ensemble of incompetent but brave characters. It notes the bonkers charm and eagerness for a sequel despite a late lore dump.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
18 May 2026 · ★★★★ · Patrick Cremona
80

The review calls it a flawed but utterly breathless action spectacle with expert staging, constant tension and comic relief in the first hour. It notes iffy CGI and overlength but says the enjoyable thrill is impossible to deny.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
17 May 2026 · festival review
80*

The critic describes a pedal-to-the-metal slaughterfest with breathless pace, gallows humour and exceptional production design in the strong first hour. It notes the running time may challenge some but praises the entertaining genre mash-up that questions allegiances.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 May 2026 · festival review · Peter Bradshaw
80*

The critic finds Na Hong-jin’s sci-fi action thriller an uproarious, rock’n’roll spectacle of alien-beast battling and car chases that delivers top-quality entertainment. The gonzo melee mixing digital effects with old-school thrills is singled out for praise, alongside the committed performances.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Tremors poster

Tremors

1990 · More local improvisation under monstrous pressure, with considerably less explaining to do.

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · Family foolishness and creature attacks, with stronger reasons to care about the humans.

Grabbers poster

Grabbers

2012 · An Irish creature comedy that makes human impracticality part of the survival plan.

Troll Hunter poster

Troll Hunter

2010 · Norwegian monster trouble handled with dry humour and a working man’s impatience.

Godzilla poster

Godzilla

1954 · A sterner account of a monster emergency, with human fear given proper weight.