John Lennon (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) stands beside a black car outside a row of brick houses
Film review

Nowhere Boy

2009 · Directed by Sam Taylor-Johnson · 1h 38m

In a sentenceJohn Lennon gets a film of his youth, and his mother and aunt promptly take charge

Teenage John Lennon (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) begins finding his way towards music while negotiating the competing claims of his family. His aunt, Mimi Smith (Kristin Scott Thomas), and his mother, Julia Lennon (Anne-Marie Duff), offer sharply different kinds of care, and his relationship with each complicates the other. John wants room to decide who he is, but the tensions between the two women keep drawing him back into family life. His first steps into music run alongside the struggle to understand where he belongs.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Sam Taylor-Johnson’s portrait of John Lennon’s youth is worth watching for its family tensions and three strong performances. Its account of musical beginnings is thinner, and the tidy biographical writing sometimes gets ahead of the boy.

Nowhere Boy is a good family drama with a musical biography attached, and the family is what makes it worth watching. Sam Taylor-Johnson concentrates on the young John Lennon caught between his mother and aunt, giving their differences more weight than his future importance. That is a sensible choice: being young and unsure where affection comes from is enough to sustain a film without constant promises of fame. The trouble is that the musical beginnings can then feel like obligations the screenplay has remembered to fulfil.

Kristin Scott Thomas gives Mimi Smith a restraint that makes the smallest suggestion of tenderness matter. We were moved by her determination to keep Mimi’s feelings contained even when the family tensions press against her. The performance lets us see how affection can become difficult to receive when it arrives with so little encouragement. Anne-Marie Duff’s Julia Lennon is more openly changeable, with pleasure and sadness close enough together to make her warmth uncertain. Both performances give the women lives beyond their usefulness in explaining John.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson brings the energy needed to stop John becoming a spectator in his own adolescence. His confidence is persuasive because vulnerability keeps showing through it; the young man can be engaging without always being easy company. He also holds his own alongside the two women, a considerable requirement in a film so dependent on their competing feelings. The performance gives us a restless adolescent when the story could easily have expected the name Lennon to do all the work.

Seamus McGarvey’s cinematography gives the film colour and a finish that is sometimes a little too handsome for the unhappiness it contains. His images of distress are carefully composed, though the polish can make a difficult moment feel too arranged. Alice Normington’s production design makes the period convincing without turning every scene into a history lesson. Julian Day’s costumes help establish the young people’s wish to make an impression. The clothes give their attempts at confidence something visible and recognisable.

Alison Goldfrapp and Will Gregory give the music a warmth that suits the family drama. The film conveys the excitement of getting started, yet it is less persuasive about what distinguishes this particular boy’s musical imagination. Lisa Gunning’s editing allows the domestic exchanges space, but the accumulation of incidents does not always produce momentum. At 98 minutes, it still has stretches where the family difficulties seem to be going round again without becoming any clearer.

Matt Greenhalgh’s screenplay is less convincing when family pain starts to serve as an explanation of personality. These relationships are interesting enough without being made responsible for everything we are supposed to recognise in John. The dialogue can be pointed, but it sometimes states a feeling that the performances have already made clear. Sam Taylor-Johnson’s direction gives the actors room to work, though it rarely disturbs the familiar shape of a musical biography.

For an evening’s family drama, there is enough here to recommend. Anyone coming chiefly for an account of how the music developed should lower their expectations. Give the mother and aunt your attention; they have rather more to say.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
9
Mixed
6
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Nowhere Boy, with praise clustering around the performances and its treatment of Lennon’s adolescence as a family drama. Aaron Johnson is widely credited with charisma and vulnerability, while Kristin Scott Thomas and Anne-Marie Duff receive particularly consistent praise for giving the domestic tensions weight. The recreation of postwar Britain also earns approval. Several critics find the emotional portrait more persuasive than the account of Lennon’s developing musical sensibility.

Opinion spreads widely over how much those strengths achieve. Admirers find an affecting coming-of-age story; detractors see a tidy, conventional biopic that lacks momentum and fresh insight. Even favourable reviews question its ambition. There are sharper disagreements over individual elements: Total Film praises Matt Greenhalgh’s dialogue, while Slant Magazine finds the dialogue and shallow psychoanalysis weakening. The Wrap also breaks with the prevailing praise for the supporting cast, describing those performances as melodramatic.

Los Angeles Times
8 October 2010 · Betsy Sharkey
85*

Sharkey finds the film an entertaining, poignantly authentic account of Lennon’s teenage years. She praises Aaron Johnson’s compelling performance and the film’s careful, evocative craft.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Trevor Johnston
80

Johnston finds the film an intriguing blend of biopic and coming-of-age story. He singles out the family tensions around Lennon’s contrasting mother and aunt, alongside his first steps into music.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 December 2009 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The review calls the film an astute rock ’n’ roll soap opera, though also a bit of a tease. It praises the film’s portrait of John Lennon’s late teenage years.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 October 2010 · ★★★/4 · Joseph Jon Lanthier
75

The critic finds the film an intriguing, often fresh take on Lennon’s youth, but says its dialogue and shallow psychoanalysis weaken the drama. He praises its focus on Lennon’s childhood and his complicated relationship with Mimi.

Read the full review →
Empire
27 November 2009 · Ian Freer
70*

Freer finds the film entertaining and well acted, though it lacks the spark and ambition of its subject. He particularly praises Aaron Johnson’s lively, vulnerable portrayal of Lennon.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The critic finds the film modest, effective and likeable, with its emotional portrait of Lennon more successful than its account of his musical sensibility. Anne-Marie Duff’s performance is singled out for balancing sadness and joy with remarkable subtlety.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Nowhere Boy worth watching?
Nowhere Boy is worth watching for its family drama and three strong central performances, and we score it 72 out of 100. We recommend it chiefly for the tensions between John Lennon, his mother and his aunt; the account of his musical beginnings is thinner, and the biographical writing sometimes explains feelings the actors have already made clear.
How long is Nowhere Boy, and what is it rated?
Nowhere Boy runs 1h 38m. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Nowhere Boy in the US?
Nowhere Boy is streaming on Tubi and Amazon Prime Video in the US, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from $3.99. It leaves Tubi on 1 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Nowhere Boy, and is it suitable for children?
Nowhere Boy has a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. The family tensions and emotional unhappiness make it a better fit for older teenagers and adults interested in a troubled adolescence; we cannot give a more specific warning about violence or frightening material from the certificate alone.
How does Nowhere Boy compare to Control?
Nowhere Boy is the stronger choice for a family-centred drama, while we recommend Control more readily for a persuasive account of a musician’s appeal. Both give private unhappiness proper weight, but Control uses live performances to make Ian Curtis’s fascination understandable; Nowhere Boy is less convincing about what distinguishes Lennon’s musical imagination, despite the strength of its actors.
What should I watch after Nowhere Boy?
After Nowhere Boy, try Control (2007, Fi1m 80): Another musician’s early life, with the private unhappiness given proper weight. Then The 400 Blows (1959, Fi1m 91): A less tidy account of adolescence, family disappointment and badly needed freedom.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Control (2007, Fi1m 80)Another musician’s early life, with the private unhappiness given proper weight.

  2. The 400 Blows (1959, Fi1m 91)A less tidy account of adolescence, family disappointment and badly needed freedom.

  3. Sing Street (2016) · not on Fi1m yetFor more of the pleasure of forming a band and finding confidence.

  4. Linda Linda Linda (2005) · not on Fi1m yetSchoolgirls rehearse for a performance, with friendship allowed to matter as much.

  5. 20th Century Women (2016) · not on Fi1m yetAnother boy grows up among women whose lives deserve films of their own.