Film review

The Emoji Movie

2017 · Directed by Tony Leondis · 1h 26m · MPA PG

In a sentenceEighty-six minutes inside a smartphone made us nostalgic for a landline

AnimationFamilyComedy

Gene (T.J. Miller) is a meh emoji living inside a smartphone, where faces and symbols have voices and personalities. He struggles to fit in, and his search for acceptance takes him through the phone’s apps. His fellow inhabitants include Hi-5 (James Corden), Jailbreak (Anna Faris) and Smiler (Maya Rudolph). Familiar software supplies the locations and obstacles as the action moves around inside the device. Gene wants to find a place for himself among the other emojis, whose identities are tied to the emotions and gestures they represent.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Tony Leondis turns a workable smartphone premise into a dull trip through familiar apps. Bright colours and occasional slapstick cannot rescue the thin characters, tired lessons or persistent sense of being advertised at.

The film has a workable idea for a family comedy: give the little symbols in a phone lives of their own. There is room there for jokes about how much people try to say with a face and how often it goes wrong. Tony Leondis directs an 86-minute film that spends too much of that opportunity travelling between apps, with a familiar lesson about self-acceptance attached. It is dull, heavily branded and short of jokes, though the bright animation supplies occasional scraps of pleasure.

The screenplay, by Tony Leondis, Eric Siegel and Mike White, asks us to care about Gene’s difficulty fitting in. That is a serviceable starting point, particularly for a character whose purpose is to express a feeling. But the film rarely finds anything peculiar to emojis in its self-acceptance story; almost any talking object could deliver these lessons. The rules inside the phone are muddled, and the dialogue spends too much energy making familiar points. Gene needs a personality worth following through all those apps.

T.J. Miller voices Gene, with James Corden as Hi-5 and Anna Faris as Jailbreak, but none gets enough help from the writing. Their characters are thinly drawn, and the performers cannot make the dialogue feel less preassembled. Maya Rudolph voices Smiler, while Patrick Stewart supplies Poop, a casting decision that seems to expect the credit itself to get a laugh. A capable voice cast has been given too few opportunities to be funny.

Carlos Zaragoza’s production design makes the inside of the smartphone a bright, busy place, and the changes of scenery have some appeal. For brief stretches, the simple pleasure of animated bodies in motion is enough. The slapstick works better than the conversations, partly because it does not have to stop and announce a lesson. The colours help keep the journey watchable, although the places themselves seldom reward a longer look.

William J. Caparella’s editing keeps the app-hopping moving, but the succession of destinations grows wearing. There is little time to enjoy a situation before the film has another piece of software to visit, and movement alone cannot give the jokes better timing. Patrick Doyle’s music cannot make the adventure involving when the writing has done so little to make its characters matter. The running time is modest, yet the journey feels padded by stops that add little beyond a change of surroundings.

We grew bored with the app tour, then irritated by how much attention Spotify and Dropbox received while the characters remained so thin. Recognisable software is a reasonable thing to find inside a smartphone, and brand names need not prevent a scene from being funny. Here, though, recognition is repeatedly offered as entertainment in itself. Candy Crush is familiar; its appearance still needs a worthwhile joke. The product placement becomes more conspicuous because there is so little else to hold our attention.

An animated family comedy does not need an elaborate plot, but it does need some curiosity about the creatures or objects it has brought to life. This one seems satisfied that talking emojis are enough, and most critics are right to find that thin. There are flashes of competent slapstick and enough colour to occupy a small child for a while. We would still choose something that gives the child a better joke and the accompanying adult a reason to stay.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

22
Positive
0
Mixed
0
Negative
21
Radio Times
★★ · Dave Aldridge
40

The critic says the film isn't quite as awful as its negative publicity suggests, though its shabby plot and unexceptional design will probably annoy adults more than the target young audience. Blatant product plugs for apps like Candy Crush are noted.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
27 July 2017 · D · Vadim Rizov
37

The critic describes it as a severely debased Inside Out set inside a smartphone, using app-hopping as an excuse for heavy product placement and corporate synergy. It singles out the clichéd self-acceptance plot and pervasive cynicism for complaint.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
27 July 2017 · Katie Walsh
30*

The movie is exactly what one expects and can be summed up as 'meh,' a perfect reflection of its main character with no surprises or greatness. It is not terrible but offers little reason to choose it over reading a book or talking to another person.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
27 July 2017 · THR Staff
30*

The critic finds the film a very dumb project that fails to match the cleverness of The Lego Movie, offering fast colorful visuals for kids but nearly nothing for parents. It singles out the incoherent plot, product placement, and lame dialogue for complaint while noting some effective slapstick adventure and eye candy.

Read the full review →
The Independent
2 August 2017 · ★★☆☆☆
30*

The critic finds it lacklustre and cookie-cutter compared to better animated films, with a premise that feels cumbersome and irritating in practice despite the bright colours and noise.

Read the full review →
Vulture
27 July 2017 · Emily Yoshida
30*

The critic calls it one of the darkest and most dismaying films ostensibly made for children, cynically selling smartphone wonder through branding and product placement. It singles out the rubber-faced emoji redesign and the bland self-empowerment message drowned in corporate obligations for complaint.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie, 2018

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture, 2017

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture

If you liked this, try…

Wreck-It Ralph poster

Wreck-It Ralph

2012 · A digital playground with clear rules, sharper jokes and characters worth following

Ernest & Celestine poster

Ernest & Celestine

2012 · A bear and a mouse make friendship matter without a sermon about acceptance

A Town Called Panic poster

A Town Called Panic

2009 · Talking toys cause trouble in a small community, with far better comic timing

The Mitchells vs. the Machines poster

The Mitchells vs. the Machines

2021 · A family faces troublesome technology, with enough affection to support the frantic jokes

The Brave Little Toaster poster

The Brave Little Toaster

1987 · Household appliances acquire personalities through their behaviour, making an unlikely journey worth taking