Joan Wilder and Jack Colton lie on the roof of a moving vehicle
Film review

The Jewel of the Nile

1985 · Directed by Lewis Teague · 1h 46m

In a sentenceKathleen Turner and Michael Douglas still enjoy each other’s company; the script seems to have come along out of obligation

Joan Wilder (Kathleen Turner) and Jack T. Colton (Michael Douglas) return for another adventure combining romance, action and comedy. Ralph (Danny DeVito) is back too, alongside characters including Omar (Spiros Focás) and Jewel (Avner Eisenberg). Joan and Jack remain the central pairing, with Ralph completing the returning trio. Their continuing adventures bring the three leads together again in a story that moves between romantic exchanges, physical action and comic interruptions. The cast also includes Holland Taylor as Gloria and Hamid Fillali as Rachid.

Fi1m review

Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas make this adventure sequel tolerable company, but the forced plotting gives them little worth returning for. Some lively action and comic exchanges cannot disguise how thin the reunion feels.

The Jewel of the Nile offers the familiar pleasure of spending more time with actors who work well together. That is a reasonable starting point for an adventure sequel, but director Lewis Teague struggles to make it sufficient. The film is busy, occasionally funny and easy enough to sit through. It is also short of reasons to exist beyond bringing back its leads, and their charm has to cover too many weaknesses in the writing.

Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas remain the chief attraction. As Joan Wilder and Jack T. Colton, they can give a routine exchange enough amusement to keep us listening, even when the surrounding story offers little encouragement. We laughed at their brisk exchanges because the pleasure they take in answering each other briefly makes the dialogue feel spontaneous. Those moments matter, though they also make the more dutiful stretches conspicuous. The pairing survives better than the adventure built around it.

Danny DeVito’s Ralph adds another welcome comic presence, but returning performers cannot supply everything a sequel needs. Lawrence Konner and Mark Rosenthal’s screenplay keeps finding business for its characters without making that business feel especially necessary. The action provides movement; the writing too often leaves us waiting for a convincing reason to care about it. At 106 minutes, this is hardly an endurance test, yet the story feels stretched because its complications generate so little curiosity.

Jan de Bont’s cinematography gives the action a finish that helps sustain attention when the plot cannot. Richard Dawking’s production design likewise contributes to the film’s appeal as an adventure spectacle, although the surroundings make a stronger impression than the situations. Teague can keep things lively, and some of the action works perfectly well on those terms. The difficulty comes when the film expects that liveliness to carry scenes whose dramatic purpose is already wearing thin.

Editors Peter Boita and Michael Ellis preserve enough forward movement to stop the weaker passages becoming a complete drag. Their work cannot make the transitions between action, romance and comedy feel consistently natural, however. Jack Nitzsche’s music contributes energy, but there is only so much a score can do when the excitement depends on our investment in a forced complication. These are competent contributions to a film whose central problem remains the screenplay. More urgency would not necessarily improve it.

The portrayal of Middle Eastern people is a more substantial objection than the familiar plotting. Too much characterisation settles for broad types, which makes the adventure feel lazy where it needs curiosity and wit. There is no requirement for a light entertainment to become a history lesson. There is a requirement to make its supporting people interesting enough to share the screen with its stars, rather than rely on those stars to provide nearly all the personality.

An adventure comedy needs room for a little nonsense, and we would not demand rigorous logic from this one. What it needs is a stronger comic rhythm and a story that makes the reunion feel worth arranging. Turner, Douglas and DeVito offer enough pleasure to prevent outright dismissal, but not enough to earn a recommendation. Fondness for the returning cast will have to do most of the work.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

55
Positive
1
Mixed
1
Negative
2
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
80

The critic finds that the sequel avoids many familiar pitfalls. They praise the leads’ evident enjoyment, along with the action and snappy one-liners.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 December 1985 · Janet Maslin
64*

The review’s verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified from the accessible page. The article text is unavailable, so its assessment cannot be reliably summarized.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CPea
40*

The available description suggests a mildly negative verdict on the sequel. It singles out the returning Turner–Douglas pairing as likeable, while noting they are less comfortable by this installment.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
35*

Nathan finds the sequel energetic and watchable but ultimately uninspired, with the original’s spark missing. He praises the cast and some action, while criticizing the forced story and its trite portrayal of Middle Eastern people.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Jewel of the Nile worth watching?
The Jewel of the Nile offers some pleasure for fans of Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas, but we score it 53 and cannot recommend it on their charm alone. Their brisk comic exchanges and some lively action make it tolerable company, though the forced plotting gives this reunion little purpose.
How long is The Jewel of the Nile, and what is it rated?
The Jewel of the Nile runs 1h 46m. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch The Jewel of the Nile in South Africa?
The Jewel of the Nile is not on any streaming or rental service in South Africa at the moment. It is available in 41 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does The Jewel of the Nile compare to Romancing the Stone?
The Jewel of the Nile is the less rewarding adventure; we recommend Romancing the Stone for its wittier romance and stronger use of Turner and Douglas together. The sequel retains their easy rapport and offers some lively action, but its forced complications make it chiefly an option for those already fond of the returning cast.
What should I watch after The Jewel of the Nile?
After The Jewel of the Nile, try Romancing the Stone (1984, Fi1m 77): The earlier adventure gives Turner and Douglas a more rewarding romantic partnership. Then The African Queen (1951, Fi1m 84): An argumentative pairing makes the adventure matter before the danger takes over; and The Mummy (1999, Fi1m 71): Romance, comic friction and adventure find a more dependable balance here.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Romancing the Stone (1984, Fi1m 77)The earlier adventure gives Turner and Douglas a more rewarding romantic partnership.

  2. The African Queen (1951, Fi1m 84)An argumentative pairing makes the adventure matter before the danger takes over.

  3. That Man from Rio (1964) · not reviewed yetFrench adventure comedy with physical wit and little interest in standing still.

  4. The Mummy (1999, Fi1m 71)Romance, comic friction and adventure find a more dependable balance here.

  5. The Lost City (2022) · not reviewed yetAnother novelist enters an adventure that proves inconvenient for her working habits.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever