Film review

The African Queen

1952 · Directed by John Huston · 1h 45m · MPA PG

In a sentenceSharing a riverboat with Katharine Hepburn looks exhausting; Humphrey Bogart makes a surprisingly good case for it

RomanceAdventureDrama

In Africa, riverboat captain Charlie Allnut (Humphrey Bogart) and missionary Rose Sayer (Katharine Hepburn) find themselves sharing a journey. Charlie drinks gin and is not accustomed to Rose’s formality; she has little time for his habits. Their immediate problem is getting along in circumstances that leave them dependent on one another. As they travel through the African landscape, their quarrels run alongside the physical dangers of the river, and neither can simply dismiss the other. The cast also includes The Brother (Robert Morley).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

John Huston’s river adventure earns its warmth through Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn, whose bickering is worth every unlikely turn of the journey. The plotting asks for indulgence, but the performances give us good reason to grant it.

John Huston gives The African Queen a simple job: put two difficult people on a riverboat and make their company worth keeping. It succeeds handsomely, helped by an adventure that keeps interrupting their disagreements before they can become tiresome. The storytelling needs indulgence, and a few of the dangers feel conveniently arranged. The performances are good enough to make those reservations matter surprisingly little.

Humphrey Bogart plays Charlie Allnut, a gin-drinking riverboat captain, with an informality that is almost an affront to Katharine Hepburn’s missionary, Rose Sayer. He makes Charlie’s lack of polish funny without turning him into a harmless pet. She gives Rose’s disapproval enough force to make their exchanges feel like negotiations over who is in charge, while allowing uncertainty to show through the firmness. Both performances retain the actors’ familiar mannerisms, but there is enough warmth here to prevent them becoming a collection of favourite tricks.

We laughed at Rose’s severity because it makes Charlie’s attempts to hold his own so awkward. The pleasure is in watching two assured performers let their characters lose a little dignity without asking for sympathy. Their bickering gives embarrassment and curiosity room to enter conversations that start in disapproval. The growing warmth is convincing because neither actor discards the irritating habits that first made the pairing funny.

Jack Cardiff’s Technicolor photography gives the African jungle a presence that the story needs. The rich colour makes the surroundings inviting to look at, while the amount of landscape around this small travelling party helps keep their predicament credible. It is a useful restraint that the scenery does not demand admiration at the expense of the actors. Their faces remain worth watching even when the background offers plenty of competition.

Ralph Kemplen’s editing is most persuasive when it gives a reply, or the delay before one, enough time to be funny. The action generally moves briskly, although a few passages seem less carefully judged than the conversations. Allan Gray’s music supplies an eager accompaniment to the danger, occasionally urging us towards excitement that the images have already earned. We would sometimes prefer a little less help, especially when a change in either actor’s voice offers enough to listen to.

James Agee and John Huston’s screenplay is less sure when it asks us to accept the adventure’s larger improbabilities. The location photography gives the journey a physical solidity that some of the plotting cannot sustain. Romantic adventure can accommodate a good deal of contrivance, but here it occasionally jars, particularly beside such carefully played human awkwardness. It is a real weakness, though the performances usually recover our attention before it has done lasting damage.

At 105 minutes, this is a companionable length for a film about people who initially seem so ill suited to company. Its pleasures do not depend on treating every predicament as plausible, though it does ask us to be generous about that. Watch it with someone whose habits occasionally try your patience.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

85
Positive
14
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus on The African Queen is warmly positive, with all fourteen reviews finding much to enjoy in John Huston’s romantic adventure. Praise centres on Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn: their awkward chemistry, sparring dialogue and growing affection give the river journey its humour and warmth. Critics repeatedly credit the performances with making the mismatched pair convincing, even when the story stretches belief. The African locations and Technicolor imagery also draw praise, while several reviews admire Huston’s handling of the action.

The differences concern how fully the filmmaking matches the leads. Time Out finds some sequences under-directed, while Sight and Sound argues that realism and fantasy never quite form a satisfactory whole. The New York Times is more sceptical about the romance’s plausibility. The spread runs from qualified enjoyment to wholehearted enthusiasm; even the more reserved reviews find substantial pleasure in the performances, setting or adventure.

The Times
22 November 2019 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

The pleasure and brilliance of John Huston’s The African Queen resides in observing these two peerless performers sparring at their most authoritative before eventually collapsing into a snog. The action scenes are expertly handled.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
19 December 2012 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is an almost perfect illustration of how much a really good movie can please, thanks to Bogart and Hepburn turning an adventure story into comedy through their chemistry and personalities.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 February 2011 · Matthew Connolly
90*

The critic praises the star chemistry and playful banter between Bogart and Hepburn, along with Huston's eye for the Technicolor jungle locations in this restoration. It singles out the performances for balancing trademark mannerisms with fresh warmth and humor.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 March 2010 · A- · Noel Murray
90

The review highlights the film's classic Hollywood charm and the endearing, awkward chemistry between Bogart and Hepburn as mismatched leads on a river adventure. It notes the screenplay's simplicity and the performances' appeal at a transitional moment in film history.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 February 2017 · THR Staff
90*

The critic calls the film top-flight entertainment full of excitement, adventure, and superlative performances from Hepburn and Bogart. Direction and script are praised for resourcefulness with the two leads and vivid action.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
3 March 2011 · ****
90*

Humphrey Bogart bagged his Oscar as a gin-swilling riverboat captain squaring off against Katharine Hepburn’s snooty missionary in John Huston’s grand, propulsive and plumly-restored slice of Technicolor derring-do.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1952

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Actor

If you liked this, try…

The Lady Eve poster90

The Lady Eve

1941 · Another unlikely courtship in which irritation proves an excellent starting point.

Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison poster

Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison

1957 · Religious conviction and practical survival make awkward companions in another intimate adventure.

Romancing the Stone poster

Romancing the Stone

1984 · A bickering couple find that outdoor danger complicates an already difficult acquaintance.

The Lunchbox poster

The Lunchbox

2013 · For the tentative affection between adults who have settled into their habits.

Hunt for the Wilderpeople poster82

Hunt for the Wilderpeople

2016 · An outdoor adventure whose mismatched travellers earn our affection through stubbornness.