Jonas Taylor (Jason Statham) swims at the surface as a megalodon lunges behind him
Film review

The Meg

2018 · Directed by Jon Turteltaub · 1h 53m · RO 12

In a sentenceJason Statham versus a giant shark should involve considerably less waiting for people to finish talking

Jonas Taylor (Jason Statham) faces a giant shark whose size makes any encounter a risk. Suyin (Li Bingbing) and Morris (Rainn Wilson) are among the people drawn into the danger, alongside James ‘Mac’ Mackreides (Cliff Curtis) and Jaxx (Ruby Rose). Jonas has to confront the animal at close quarters, while the people around him bring their own tensions and relationships to the crisis. As the threat brings him into the water, human disagreements share space with the problem of stopping a creature far larger than the people trying to deal with it.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Jason Statham is good company, and the shark supplies a few tense encounters. But The Meg spends too long on flat dialogue and unconvincing drama to earn a recommendation.

Jason Statham facing a giant shark is a sound enough reason to make The Meg. Jon Turteltaub gets a few tense and amusing encounters out of the idea, but surrounds them with dull conversations and drama that asks for more concern than it earns. We cannot quite recommend it, even on the modest terms of a creature feature. At 113 minutes, it spends too long making us wait for the attraction named in the title.

Jason Statham is the strongest reason to persist. His Jonas Taylor has a weary confidence that makes the ridiculous danger easier to accept, and his physical commitment keeps the action interesting when the effects cannot. We laughed at his air of having another tiresome job to sort out, even with that animal to contend with. He takes the threat seriously enough for the suspense to work without insisting that we regard the whole enterprise with solemn respect.

The screenplay by Jon Hoeber, Erich Hoeber and Dean Georgaris gives him little help between encounters. Its dramatic stretches ask us to invest in relationships that the dialogue barely develops, while the romance slows a film already prone to hesitation. Li Bingbing gets disappointingly little to work with as Suyin. Rainn Wilson finds some welcome amusement in Morris, but cannot keep the surrounding dialogue lively. The shifts from comic nonsense to earnest feeling repeatedly leave the cast trying to persuade us that a conversation matters when the writing has supplied no reason.

Tom Stern’s cinematography does not consistently make the shark’s bulk felt beside a human body, which is a substantial failing here. The computer-generated creature can command attention without making its movements convincing enough to frighten us. Grant Major’s production design contributes to the glossy finish, although the surroundings have little character of their own. The better encounters concentrate on the person at risk and allow the animal’s size to become a practical problem rather than merely something to look at.

Steven Kemper’s editing finds more tension within individual encounters than across the film as a whole. A passage of shark action can hold our attention, only for the next exchange of dialogue to let it slip away. Harry Gregson-Williams’s score helps the action along, but cannot repair those repeated losses of momentum. By the time the film returns to danger, it has often given itself unnecessary work to do in recovering our attention.

The 12A certificate is no excuse for the shortage of fear. A shark thriller can make us dread an approach, a pause or the space around a swimmer without showing much injury, but this one rarely sustains that dread. Its few taut encounters show that Jon Turteltaub can make the ridiculous threatening when he keeps the action simple. Too much of the rest seems cautious about both frightening us and letting the absurdity become properly funny.

Anyone drawn mainly by Jason Statham may find enough to justify the quieter stretches. Expect neither sustained suspense nor a comedy that makes the most of its ridiculous premise. If the shark is the deciding factor, our advice is to choose something with fewer conversations.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

48
Positive
2
Mixed
12
Negative
11

The reviews lean towards disappointment, though most critics find at least some entertainment in The Meg’s giant-shark premise. Praise centres on Jason Statham, whose charm and physical commitment keep several reviewers interested when the dialogue and drama do not. The shark encounters earn qualified approval for their scale, absurdity and occasional tension. Even some sceptical reviews acknowledge that individual suspense sequences work, but enthusiasm for the spectacle rarely extends to the whole film.

The main divide is over how much fun survives the weak dialogue, uneven tone and stretches spent with uninteresting characters. Opinions on the effects and pacing vary, and verdicts range widely. Consequence enjoys the cast’s commitment and welcomes the attention paid to the characters; The Ringer finds the film lifeless despite Statham. Between those positions, the recurring complaint is straightforward: a film about an enormous shark ought to provide more excitement than this.

Screen Daily
9 August 2018 · Demetrios Matheou
64*

The review text is behind a paywall, so its verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the accessible text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 August 2018
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the review can be verified.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
9 August 2018 · ★★½/4 · Brian Tallerico
62

The review finds the film entertaining but shallow. It singles out the over-the-top shark spectacle as its main appeal.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 August 2018 · ★★½/4 · Niles Schwartz
62

Schwartz finds the film successful as a Jason Statham vehicle, despite its adolescent quality beside Jaws. He praises Statham’s screen presence for commanding attention even when the computer-generated shark is on screen.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
9 August 2018 · 4/3/2 · Hannah Strong
60

Strong finds the film overcomplicated and short on thrills, leaving its potential largely wasted. She singles out Statham’s world-weary charm as the main source of laughs.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 August 2018 · Wendy Ide
60*

Ide finds the film an enjoyable but silly romp, weakened by a cliché-ridden script and tonal problems. She praises Jason Statham’s jaunty charm, which helps carry the film despite its flaws.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Meg worth watching?
The Meg falls short of a recommendation, and we score it 49/100, though Jason Statham fans may find enough to enjoy. His weary confidence and a few tense shark encounters help, but flat dialogue, thin relationships and repeated pauses in the action make the 113 minutes feel unnecessarily long.
How long is The Meg, and what is it rated?
The Meg runs 1h 53m and is rated 12 by the RO in Romania. It is an action and science fiction film.
Where can I watch The Meg in Romania?
The Meg is streaming on Netflix in Romania, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from lei 9.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Meg, and is it suitable for children?
The Meg has a UK 12A certificate and contains tense giant-shark encounters, though we find its sustained capacity to frighten limited. Children under 12 need an accompanying adult at the cinema; younger or sensitive viewers may still find the danger upsetting, even if teenagers seeking stronger horror find it rather cautious.
How does The Meg compare to Jaws?
The Meg is the weaker thriller beside Jaws, offering Jason Statham’s dry humour and occasional tense encounters rather than patient, sustained suspense. We recommend Jaws for characters worth caring about and water that feels unsafe; The Meg suits those chiefly interested in Statham confronting an absurdly large shark, provided they can tolerate the talk between encounters.
Is The Meg based on a true story or a book?
The Meg is adapted from a novel by Steve Alten, rather than based on a true story. We judge it as a creature feature in its own right: Statham supplies welcome humour, but the flat dialogue and repeated interruptions to the shark action are the problems, not any need to know the source.
What should I watch after The Meg?
After The Meg, try Jaws (1975, Fi1m 93): For patient suspense that makes a stretch of water feel unsafe. Then Tremors (1990, Fi1m 82): For capable comic performers taking an absurd creature problem seriously; and Crawl (2019, Fi1m 76): For close quarters, rising water and a welcome shortage of idle conversation.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Jaws (1975, Fi1m 93)For patient suspense that makes a stretch of water feel unsafe.

  2. Tremors (1990, Fi1m 82)For capable comic performers taking an absurd creature problem seriously.

  3. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetFor a creature feature whose human relationships deserve the time they take.

  4. Rogue (2007) · not reviewed yetFor leaner waterside suspense and a firmer sense of physical danger.

  5. Crawl (2019, Fi1m 76)For close quarters, rising water and a welcome shortage of idle conversation.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever