Maria Coughlin (Adrienne Shelly) stands beneath traffic lights in a varsity jacket and pale dress
Film review

Trust

1990 · Directed by Hal Hartley · 1h 46m

In a sentenceBoy carries a hand grenade, girl carries a baby; neither is sure which is the worse idea

Maria Coughlin (Adrienne Shelly), a high school student on suburban Long Island, tells her parents over breakfast that she is pregnant and has dropped out. Her father calls her a name, she slaps him, and he collapses dead on the kitchen floor. Her mother Jean (Rebecca Nelson, credited as Merritt Nelson) throws her out; her footballer boyfriend Anthony (Gary Sauer) drops her the moment he hears the word pregnant. Across town Matthew Slaughter (Martin Donovan), an electronics repairman, quits his job by clamping his boss’s head in a vice and goes home to a father (John MacKay) who makes him scrub the bathroom twice. Matthew carries a live hand grenade in his jacket. Maria, still in her shiny party dress, finds him sitting alone in an empty house, and the two of them start talking.

Fi1m review

Hal Hartley’s second film is a deadpan romance between two damaged people on Long Island, written in flat, funny, exact sentences. The manner wears thin in places, but Adrienne Shelly and Martin Donovan make the stillness mean something.

Hal Hartley’s second film, after The Unbelievable Truth (1989), opens with a slap and a death and gets on with it. Maria Coughlin (Adrienne Shelly) tells her parents she is pregnant, her father insults her, she hits him, and he drops dead on the kitchen lino. That is the first three minutes. Hartley, who wrote, produced and directed, does not play it as tragedy or as farce. He shoots it square, cuts away, and moves on to the next room, and the whole of Trust is built like that: dreadful things said in level voices, and a camera that declines to react. It is a good film, and for anyone who can take the manner, a quietly affecting one.

Matthew Slaughter (Martin Donovan) repairs televisions, quits by putting his boss’s head in a vice, and goes home to a father (John MacKay) who makes him clean the bathroom and then makes him clean it again. He carries a hand grenade in his jacket and does not say why. Maria, thrown out by her mother Jean (Rebecca Nelson, credited as Merritt Nelson) and dropped by her boyfriend Anthony (Gary Sauer), wanders the streets in a shiny party dress until she finds Matthew sitting in an empty house. They talk. Hartley’s people talk in sentences that sound written down, because they were, and the trick of the film is that Shelly and Donovan say them as if they had only just thought of them.

Michael Spiller shoots Long Island in flat, bright colour: a red door, a yellow kitchen, a blue coat, people placed dead centre and often facing us rather than each other. Daniel Ouellette gives the Coughlin house the look of a place where nothing has been moved in twenty years, and the Slaughter house the look of one scrubbed until it hurts. Claudia Brown keeps Maria in that party dress for the first stretch, then puts her in a plain skirt and thick spectacles, and the change in her clothes does the work a page of dialogue about growing up would have done. Nick Gomez cuts on the lines, holding a face for a beat after it has spoken and then leaving hard. Phillip Reed’s score is a few spare electronic figures, repeated under the pauses, that never tell us what to feel.

Shelly plays Maria’s growing up as a run of small, practical decisions, and she is good at looking as though she is deciding. Donovan is a big man holding himself very still, the anger showing only in his hands. There is a conversation between them, some way in, about the difference between loving someone and respecting and admiring them, and we laughed at it and then found it had got under our skin. What did it was Donovan’s face, which does not move while Shelly sets out the distinction, and the plain fact that neither of them is joking. These are two people who cannot say what they feel, and the flat delivery is not a style laid over them; it is who they are.

The manner has its costs. Everyone in the film speaks in the same cadence, so the comedy is all in one key and there are stretches where it wants a second. A thread about a woman (Suzanne Costollos) who lifts a baby from a pushchair at a bus stop is set up with care and used for less than it promises. Jim Slaughter is written as a monster and MacKay plays him as one, and the scenes in that bathroom go from bleak to repetitive before Hartley lets them go. The pauses are long and the faces still, and we lost patience once or twice in the middle stretch before a line pulled us back.

The Coughlin house is where the film has most life. Nelson’s Jean bargains with her daughter for housework as though affection were something you paid off in instalments, and never once raises her voice. Edie Falco, as Maria’s older sister Peg, watches Matthew with an interest she does not bother to hide. Karen Sillas has one scene as a nurse and it is the warmest thing in the picture, a stranger being kind in a room built for bad news.

The Unbelievable Truth had the same voice without much underneath it. Here the voice has a reason to exist, and the film is better for it. Watch it with someone who will not keep asking why nobody blinks. It runs 106 minutes, and there is a grenade in it, and Hartley knows exactly how long you can be made to wait.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
0

With only 5 reviews in so far, the picture is thin but leans mildly warm. Most critics find Hartley’s film distinctive: the deadpan humour and controlled framing draw praise, as does dialogue that reads as literary without sounding written. The reservations are about warmth. Empire finds the film occasionally too cute and knowing for its own good, and the Los Angeles Times warns that the long pauses and emotional thinness will lose some viewers. Two of the five reviews are only partially available, so their verdicts cannot be confirmed, which keeps the spread from being read with much confidence.

Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
75*

The review finds the film original and engaging, though occasionally too cute and knowing. It praises Hartley’s dialogue for balancing literary style with realism.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 August 1991 · Peter Rainer
65*

Rainer finds the film stylish and distinctive, though its emotional thinness and long pauses may lose some viewers. He particularly praises Hartley’s controlled visual style and deadpan humor.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 July 1991
64*

The headline presents the film as a black comedy about unlikely lovers. The article text was unavailable, so its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be confirmed.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available page identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its description frames the film as revisiting the small-town situations of Hartley’s earlier work.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
28 January 2013 · ★★★ · Chris Cabin
60

The critic regards Trust as a beguiling masterwork whose odd romance and confident artistry reward close attention. They praise Hartley’s bold imagery and the Blu-ray’s clear, colorful transfer, while wishing the extras offered more production context.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Trust worth watching?
Trust is worth watching for anyone who can take a romance played entirely in level voices and long pauses, and we scored it 79. Adrienne Shelly and Martin Donovan make Hal Hartley's written-down sentences sound like people thinking, and the film moved us more than its stillness suggests it could. Viewers who want their comedy to change key will lose patience in the middle stretch.
How long is Trust, and what is it rated?
Trust runs 1h 46m. It is a drama and comedy film.
Where can I watch Trust in Panama?
Trust is not on any streaming or rental service in Panama at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How does Trust compare to The Unbelievable Truth?
Trust is the better film, because Hal Hartley's flat, exact way of talking has something underneath it here that The Unbelievable Truth lacks. The earlier film is rougher and cheaper, shorter and slightly stiff, with Adrienne Shelly in both; its jokes come from people repeating what they have heard, and it stays likeable without getting under the skin. Start with Trust, then go back if the voice suits you.
What should I watch after Trust?
After Trust, try The Unbelievable Truth (1989, Fi1m 76): Hartley’s first film, with Shelly again; the same voice, rougher and cheaper. Then Metropolitan (1990, Fi1m 82): Whit Stillman’s talkative Manhattan debutantes, written with the same care for exact sentences; and Punch-Drunk Love (2002, Fi1m 84): Another stiff, furious man finds a woman who does not flinch; bright colour, odd rhythms.

Cast

Awards

The Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award, 1991

Won
The Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Unbelievable Truth (1989, Fi1m 76)Hartley’s first film, with Shelly again; the same voice, rougher and cheaper.

  2. The Match Factory Girl (1990) · not on Fi1m yetKaurismäki’s Finnish deadpan, sadder and shorter; nobody smiles and it still lands.

  3. Metropolitan (1990, Fi1m 82)Whit Stillman’s talkative Manhattan debutantes, written with the same care for exact sentences.

  4. Punch-Drunk Love (2002, Fi1m 84)Another stiff, furious man finds a woman who does not flinch; bright colour, odd rhythms.

  5. Harold and Maude (1971, Fi1m 81)The unlikeliest of couples, death treated lightly, and a young man who needs to grow up.