George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley embrace in a portrait surrounded by smaller photographs
Film review

WHAM!

2023 · Directed by Chris Smith · 1h 32m

In a sentenceA pop documentary that allows a man to be pleased for his friend without looking for the catch

Andrew Ridgeley and George Michael appear as themselves in an account of their beginnings as a pop duo. Michael wants to develop as a songwriter, and Ridgeley supports his ambitions as their partnership takes shape. Ridgeley’s reflections run alongside Michael’s archive recordings, with scrapbooks and footage supplying a record of their early progress. Shirlie Holliman also appears as herself in archive footage. The account stays with the friendship and the music, allowing both men to describe how they remember their beginnings and what each brings to the partnership.

Fi1m review

Chris Smith’s documentary is an affectionate, enjoyable account of Andrew Ridgeley and George Michael’s friendship. Its archive brings them close, though the fondness too often discourages the questions that would make this more revealing.

Chris Smith’s documentary is warm, brisk and worth an evening, though it is less curious than its subjects deserve. Its most persuasive subject is the friendship between Andrew Ridgeley and George Michael, particularly the support Ridgeley gives Michael’s developing songwriting. There is enough here to make that support interesting in its own right. We do not need a quarrel to make a partnership worth watching, and the director is sensible enough not to manufacture one.

Editor Gregor Lyon brings George Michael’s archive recordings together with Andrew Ridgeley’s reflections, giving their separate accounts the ease of a conversation. We were moved by Ridgeley’s support for his friend’s songwriting: hearing him value that talent makes their affection convincing without a speech about loyalty. That matters because the film asks us to care about both men, despite their different contributions to the music. Both are given room to talk.

The scrapbook framing and animation give the archive a shape without smothering it in explanation. It is an approachable way of presenting the material, keeping our attention on the two men without making the documentary’s assembly a distraction. We can enjoy their recollections without being instructed to regard every remembered moment as a landmark. The format is well suited to the early account of the duo finding their way.

Tim Atack has the music credit, and the film sensibly lets the songs provide much of its momentum. Their energy keeps the account buoyant when the storytelling grows hurried. What we miss is sustained attention to how that music was made: admiration for a songwriter is a beginning, and the film too often treats it as sufficient. The archive offers plenty to enjoy, but the musical discussion needs more time.

The larger reservation is that Chris Smith seems reluctant to let a difficult question interrupt a fond recollection. A documentary need not punish its subjects for being successful, and there is something welcome about the lack of appetite for scandal here. But friendship can withstand closer inspection than it receives. We want to understand what each man needed from the other, beyond the broad account of encouragement and ambition that the film supplies.

That limit is felt most keenly with Andrew Ridgeley, whose importance is acknowledged without his life getting quite the same attention. The film makes us interested in him, then seems content to have established that he was a good friend. George Michael’s archive voice is candid enough to suggest how much further the account might have gone. Neither man needs to be diminished for the portrait to become fuller.

We welcome a music documentary that takes encouragement seriously without insisting on a rivalry. The familiar demand for friction can make a supportive friend seem like someone a film has to work around; here, his place in the story matters. At 92 minutes, there is room for that emphasis without exhausting the appeal of the archive. Choose it for a relaxed evening with the music, not a searching biography.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
10
Mixed
2
Negative
2

Most critics find this an affectionate, enjoyable account of George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley’s partnership, with praise clustering around the archive footage and the pair’s candid voices. The music supplies much of the pleasure, while the friendship gives the documentary its warmth. Several reviews welcome the attention paid to Ridgeley’s support for Michael’s songwriting. Even some less enthusiastic responses find the scrapbook presentation appealing and the celebration of the duo’s early years entertaining.

The disagreement is over how much the film reveals beneath that cheerful surface. The Evening Standard finds it illuminating and refreshingly restrained in its praise; The i Paper considers it fawning and shallow, despite enjoying the portrait of the friendship. Digital Spy offers the sharpest objection, finding too little exploration of Michael’s closeted identity and struggles. Reservations elsewhere concern pacing, limited discoveries for established fans and stories left unexplored. The spread is wide, despite the clear positive majority.

Variety
8 July 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
85*

Gleiberman finds the documentary joyful and more substantial than a simple nostalgia trip, while tracing George Michael’s artistic ambition. He especially praises how it captures the distinctive energy and musical richness of Wham!’s best songs.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
17 June 2023 · ★★★★ · El Hunt
80

Hunt finds the documentary genuinely illuminating and refreshingly free of exaggerated praise, despite some pacing issues. She particularly praises the candid archived narration from George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley.

Read the full review →
Total Film
23 June 2023 · ★★★★ · James Mottram
80

The critic finds the documentary buoyant, joyful, and warmly positive about the band’s friendship. He especially praises how the archival footage and interview audio convey Ridgeley’s support for Michael’s songwriting.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
5 July 2023 · Noel Murray
75*

Murray finds the documentary an enjoyable treat for fans of 1980s culture, though longtime followers may learn little that is new. He praises the wealth of audio and video that gives both George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley room to share grounded perspectives.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
17 June 2023 · festival review · Fionnuala Halligan
70*

The available description presents the documentary as a peppy account of WHAM!’s early days. It highlights George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley recounting their proto-boy-band beginnings; the full review is behind a paywall.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 July 2023 · Ben Kenigsberg
70*

The review presents the documentary as a compact, warmly nostalgic look back at Wham!. It singles out the archival material as a strength.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

How long is WHAM!, and what is it rated?
WHAM! runs 1h 32m. It is a documentary and music film.
Where can I watch WHAM! in Estonia?
WHAM! is streaming on Netflix in Estonia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
What should I watch after WHAM!?
After WHAM!, try Buena Vista Social Club (1999, Fi1m 76): Another affectionate musical gathering, with more room for the performers to breathe. Then The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967, Fi1m 84): For more musical pleasure, with friendship and romantic longing driving the dancing.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Stop Making Sense (1984) · not reviewed yetFor the pleasure of watching musicians work, with explanations kept sensibly out.

  2. Buena Vista Social Club (1999, Fi1m 76)Another affectionate musical gathering, with more room for the performers to breathe.

  3. The Punk Singer (2013) · not reviewed yetA musician’s public confidence gets a searching, more personal examination.

  4. Linda Linda Linda (2005) · not reviewed yetA school band finds its nerve through rehearsal, friendship and shared mistakes.

  5. The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967, Fi1m 84)For more musical pleasure, with friendship and romantic longing driving the dancing.