Matt LeBlanc, Sean Lincoln (Stephen Mangan) and Beverly Lincoln (Tamsin Greig) lie together in a flower-lined coffin
Series review

Episodes

2011 · Created by David Crane, Jeffrey Klarik · Series · 30m · ACB MA 15+

In a sentenceMatt LeBlanc plays Matt LeBlanc, while Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan make bickering look like the more demanding job

Beverly Lincoln (Tamsin Greig) and Sean Lincoln (Stephen Mangan) are the bickering pair at the centre of this half-hour comedy about television. Matt LeBlanc plays Matt LeBlanc, with Merc Lapidus (John Pankow), Carol Rance (Kathleen Rose Perkins) and Morning Randolph (Mircea Monroe) among the surrounding characters. The early episodes draw on the pair’s arguments and their encounters with the American supporting characters, with a security guard featuring in a recurring gag. Andy Button (Joseph May) is also part of the ensemble.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Episodes is an enjoyable, uneven television comedy whose actors are often sharper than its industry jokes. Tamsin Greig, Stephen Mangan and Matt LeBlanc make it worth trying, provided predictable satire does not spoil the evening.

Television people making a comedy about television have a head start on the details and a particular temptation to mistake recognition for a joke. Episodes, created by David Crane and Jeffrey Klarik, falls into that trap often enough to be irritating, but its actors keep rescuing it. We recommend it for their company, with reservations about how much the industry material can surprise. The comedy is most persuasive when somebody is being difficult and the person opposite has to endure it.

Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan give Beverly Lincoln and Sean Lincoln enough friction to sustain interest when the jokes are running thin. Their bickering works because both performances make an argument feel worth pursuing, even when we would welcome an end to it. We laughed more readily at their irritation with one another than at the programme’s cleverness about television. Their watchability makes the early predictability easier to forgive, though it cannot produce laughs that the writing has not supplied.

Matt LeBlanc, playing Matt LeBlanc, is the obvious reason to look in, and he earns the attention. Playing a named version of oneself can become an indulgence, with the audience expected to applaud the willingness to look foolish. His performance has enough assurance that we can enjoy it without congratulating him for taking the part. He also finds feeling in material that could have remained a prolonged joke about a celebrity, giving the series something useful beyond the initial curiosity of watching him play himself.

The American supporting characters supply some of the pleasure too. John Pankow plays Merc Lapidus and Kathleen Rose Perkins plays Carol Rance, and the programme benefits from looking beyond its central trio. Its account of television can be perceptive without being especially surprising. Anyone already inclined to distrust the business will find plenty to recognise, but fewer occasions to reconsider that view.

Rob Kitzmann’s cinematography is unobtrusive, and we would not choose Episodes for the images alone. The production design, credited to Miranda Jones, Chris Hansen, Jonathan Paul Green, Grenville Horner and P. Erik Carlson, is similarly discreet; the performers remain the attraction. Nigel Williams’s editing makes a more noticeable contribution to the quieter comedy, allowing small reactions enough room to register. Those passages are welcome in a programme that sometimes seems too eager to establish that it knows how the business works.

We grew impatient with the recurring security-guard gag, which keeps returning long after its joke is clear. As writers, David Crane and Jeffrey Klarik are too willing to repeat something familiar when the early episodes could use a fresh source of trouble. The later material has a better grasp of how to let feeling into the comedy without stopping to announce it. That development earns some patience, although the early shortage of laughs remains a real cost.

Television satire tends to attract an audience already willing to believe the worst about television, so a little less certainty would help here. There is enough feeling in the performances to interest anyone with no particular appetite for production gossip. Give the opening a little patience; its actors deserve the chance even when the jokes are slow to arrive.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
0
IndieWire
16 August 2017 · A- · Ben Travers
90

Travers praises the final season as sharp, funny, and emotionally perceptive. He singles out Matt LeBlanc’s performance and the subtle editing in a particularly affecting scene.

Read the full review →
Variety
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 January 2011 · Sam Wollaston
50*

Wollaston finds the series smart and funny, but ultimately mixed and somewhat irritating. He praises its insight into television and the American supporting characters, while finding the repeated security-guard gag tiresome.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
11 January 2011 · Ryan Lambie
55*

Lambie finds the premiere entertaining but predictable, with too few genuine laughs. He praises the watchability of Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan as the bickering leads.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Episodes worth watching?
Episodes is worth watching for its actors and character comedy rather than its predictable television satire; we score it 72. Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan make bickering entertaining, while Matt LeBlanc brings feeling to playing himself, though the early shortage of laughs and repeated gags require some patience.
How long is Episodes, and what is it rated?
Episodes has episodes of about 30m and is rated MA 15+ by the ACB in Australia. It is a comedy series.
Where can I watch Episodes in Australia?
Episodes is not on any streaming or rental service in Australia at the moment. It is available in 8 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Episodes, and is it suitable for children?
Episodes carries a UK 15 certificate and a US TV-MA rating, so it is not suitable for children. Those ratings indicate mature material, but we cannot give a specific warning about violence or frightening scenes; the certificates are the clearest guide for parents considering it for teenagers.
How does Episodes compare to The Larry Sanders Show?
Episodes is the gentler, more uneven choice beside The Larry Sanders Show, whose harsher backstage comedy earns our stronger recommendation. Both have patience for difficult performers, but we would choose Episodes for its central trio and bickering; The Larry Sanders Show makes keeping a needy chat-show host happy painfully funny, though some celebrity references need explaining.
What should I watch after Episodes?
After Episodes, try The Larry Sanders Show (1992, Fi1m 91): The backstage comedy is harsher, with comparable patience for difficult performers. Then Extras (2005, Fi1m 81): Another uncomfortable encounter between working actors, celebrity vanity and professional disappointment; and The Player (1992, Fi1m 85): A colder Hollywood satire, for when professional selfishness needs sharper consequences.

Cast

Awards

Golden Nymph for Best European Comedy TV Series, 2014

Won
Golden Nymph for Best European Comedy TV Series

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2011

Nominated
Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Larry Sanders Show (1992, Fi1m 91)The backstage comedy is harsher, with comparable patience for difficult performers.

  2. Extras (2005, Fi1m 81)Another uncomfortable encounter between working actors, celebrity vanity and professional disappointment.

  3. Boris (2007) · not reviewed yetItalian television production provides a different workplace for familiar artistic compromises.

  4. Day for Night (1973) · not reviewed yetFilm-making friction receives a warmer treatment, with ample room for absurdity.

  5. The Player (1992, Fi1m 85)A colder Hollywood satire, for when professional selfishness needs sharper consequences.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever