Albert and Anna sit facing each other across a wooden table indoors
Film review

A Million Ways to Die in the West

2014 · Directed by Seth MacFarlane · 1h 56m · MK 15+

In a sentenceA Western with fine scenery and a worrying faith in the comic endurance of flatulence

Albert (Seth MacFarlane), Anna (Charlize Theron) and Louise (Amanda Seyfried) lead the cast of characters in this comedy Western. They are joined by Clinch (Liam Neeson), Edward (Giovanni Ribisi), Foy (Neil Patrick Harris) and Ruth (Sarah Silverman). Other characters include George Stark (Christopher Hagen), Cochise (Wes Studi), the Old Prospector (Matt Clark), Lewis (Evan Jones) and Ben (Aaron McPherson). Seth MacFarlane also directs, sharing the writing credit with Alec Sulkin and Wellesley Wild. The film runs for 116 minutes and carries a 15 certificate.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Seth MacFarlane’s Western comedy has a willing supporting cast and too few jokes for 116 minutes. Charlize Theron brings the ease it needs, but repetitive vulgarity and a laboured lead performance make it a poor return on an evening.

A Million Ways to Die in the West is a poor comedy with a good supporting cast. Seth MacFarlane directs, co-writes and plays Albert, whose whiny manner soon wears thin. Putting a modern comic voice into a Western is a workable idea, and there are occasional laughs when the film lets absurdity take over. Too often, though, the leading man’s complaints arrive with the expectation that we will agree with them. He gets plenty of time to talk and gives us little reason to enjoy his company.

The screenplay, credited to Seth MacFarlane, Alec Sulkin and Wellesley Wild, keeps returning to material it has already exhausted. Sex jokes and bodily functions supply much of the humour, with another crude variation offered when the last one has barely finished. We were bored by the repeated flatulence jokes. The setups become recognisable before the punchlines arrive, and the film gives us far too long to notice. A few absurd detours are funny enough to suggest that a shorter, less insistent version might have worked.

Charlize Theron does the most to keep it watchable. As Anna, she brings a loose, playful manner that makes the dialogue seem less effortful and allows the humour to emerge without quite so much announcement. Her ease also exposes the strain in the leading performance. Seth MacFarlane can deliver a complaint, but he struggles to make Albert interesting between them. When the film asks us to care about its familiar romance, that thin characterisation starts to matter.

Sarah Silverman finds some welcome cheerfulness in Ruth, and Neil Patrick Harris gives Foy enough comic energy to make the surrounding sluggishness more obvious. The supporting performances deserve credit for finding laughs in material that so often labours over them. There is a sourness to the humour, though, that their goodwill cannot consistently overcome. The film can seem pleased with its readiness to offend before it has worked out what is funny.

Michael Barrett’s cinematography gives the Western scenery breadth and makes it worth looking at even when the dialogue has become tiresome. Joel McNeely’s energetic score also understands the pleasure of a Western played straight. The music gives the picture a sense of movement that the jokes struggle to sustain. Stephen J. Lineweaver’s production design helps make the setting credible, which is useful when the dialogue is determined to sound as though it belongs somewhere else. The surroundings look ready for a more assured film.

Jeff Freeman’s editing leaves too much air around material that needs to move on. At 116 minutes, the film gives its repeated setups time to become an irritation, while the digressions make the story feel less purposeful. A detour can be worth taking for one good laugh, but too many of these interruptions feel included simply because someone liked the idea. The occasional successful visual joke makes that lack of discipline more frustrating, since there is comic invention here.

Comic Westerns have plenty to mock in their heroes, their villains and the stories they tell about themselves. This one spends too much time on bodily embarrassment, a source of jokes that hardly requires a Western setting. There is affection for the genre in the images and music, but little comic curiosity about it once the swearing starts. Anyone tempted by the supporting cast should expect to do a fair amount of waiting between laughs.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

41
Positive
3
Mixed
7
Negative
13

Most critics find A Million Ways to Die in the West an uneven, overlong comedy whose occasional good jokes cannot sustain it. Praise clusters around Charlize Theron’s lively performance, with supporting players supplying laughs that reviewers often find missing from Seth MacFarlane’s central turn. Several reviews also admire the Western cinematography and score, finding more assurance in the film’s presentation than in its comic timing.

The main complaints concern repetitive vulgarity, slack pacing and a lead character the film treats too indulgently. The spread is wide: some critics find scattered pleasures, while others regard the comedy as largely unsuccessful. Collider offers a more favourable reading of the juvenile humour, finding it consistently funny despite the length and the hero’s easy treatment. Paste also enjoys the film, arguing that its thoughtful moments balance the scatology, though it shares reservations about the pacing and MacFarlane’s fit with the cast.

IndieWire
28 May 2014 · B- · Eric Kohn
70

Kohn finds the comedy enjoyable in stretches but ultimately too sloppy and mean-spirited to match its Western inspirations. He singles out Charlize Theron’s performance and several inventive digressions as highlights.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. The review’s specific praise or complaint is also unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
64*

The page content is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is visible.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
60

Krizanovich calls the film a potential future classic. She praises MacFarlane’s modern take on the Wild West, likening it to Blazing Saddles with contemporary profanity.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 May 2014 · ★★★ · Philip Kemp
60

Kemp finds the comedy western uneven but says its hits outnumber its misses. He praises the supporting cast, particularly Charlize Theron, while noting Seth MacFarlane’s awkward performance.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 May 2014 · C- · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
50

The critic finds the comedy repetitive and poorly shaped, with too little material stretched across its runtime. He singles out a few visual and dialogue jokes as funny, but says they are buried under repeated setups and crude humor.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is A Million Ways to Die in the West worth watching?
A Million Ways to Die in the West is a poor comedy that we score 40/100, with too few laughs to justify its 116 minutes. Charlize Theron and the willing supporting cast offer some pleasure for fans of crude humour, but repeated bodily-function jokes and Seth MacFarlane’s laboured lead performance make it difficult to recommend.
How long is A Million Ways to Die in the West, and what is it rated?
A Million Ways to Die in the West runs 1h 56m and is rated 15+ by the MK in Czechia. It is a comedy and western film.
Where can I watch A Million Ways to Die in the West in Czechia?
A Million Ways to Die in the West is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from Kč 49.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is A Million Ways to Die in the West, and is it suitable for children?
A Million Ways to Die in the West carries a UK 15 certificate and is unsuitable for children, with sex jokes, swearing and repeated bodily-function humour. We would steer anyone who dislikes crude comedy away; the certificate indicates material for older teenagers and adults, but does not by itself establish how violent or frightening the film is.
How does A Million Ways to Die in the West compare to Hot Fuzz?
A Million Ways to Die in the West is the weaker genre spoof beside Hot Fuzz, which we recommend for its tighter plotting and jokes that reward attention. Both show affection for their genres, but the Western relies too heavily on repetitive vulgarity; Hot Fuzz offers sharper comedy, despite repeated gags and action that runs on too long.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Blazing Saddles (1974) · not on Fi1m yetA more pointed Western spoof, with sharper targets and much firmer comic timing.

  2. Destry Rides Again (1939) · not on Fi1m yetA gentler comic Western whose central performance supplies the charm missing here.

  3. The Good, the Bad, the Weird (2008) · not on Fi1m yetSouth Korean Western adventure that keeps its comic chaos moving at a useful speed.

  4. Tampopo (1985) · not on Fi1m yetA Japanese noodle-shop comedy that puts its fondness for Western conventions to work.

  5. Hot Fuzz (2007, Fi1m 84)Another affectionate genre spoof, with tighter plotting and jokes that reward paying attention.