Evelyn Abbott (Emily Blunt) and Lee Abbott (John Krasinski) walk across a steel truss bridge
Film review

A Quiet Place Part II

2021 · Directed by John Krasinski · 1h 37m

In a sentenceNinety-seven minutes of wanting everyone to be more careful with their feet

An alien invasion sends the Abbott family scrambling for shelter, with an attack spilling into a restaurant. Later, Evelyn Abbott (Emily Blunt) must protect her baby while keeping Regan Abbott (Millicent Simmonds) and Marcus Abbott (Noah Jupe) safe. Sound draws danger, so even moving from one place to another requires care. The family’s search for safety brings them into contact with Emmett (Cillian Murphy). They need somewhere to shelter, but every unfamiliar space brings the risk of making a noise that will tell the creatures where they are.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

A tense, skilfully staged sequel, carried by Millicent Simmonds and an exacting use of sound. John Krasinski is less sure of the wider story, where contrived choices and hurried character development weaken the family’s hold on us.

John Krasinski has made a sequel that still knows how to make us sit still. A Quiet Place Part II is a tense, well-acted creature thriller, with enough care in its staging to survive some thin writing. Its attempt to take the Abbott family’s struggle into a wider world is less persuasive than its immediate business of getting people through danger. At 97 minutes, it does not waste much time, though the family sometimes needs more of it.

The opening invasion is the strongest stretch, with enough confusion to be frightening and enough clarity to keep us involved. We were frightened by the restaurant attack; the familiar setting makes the violence harder to keep at a distance. Jess Gonchor’s production design helps here, making the restaurant feel like somewhere people use rather than somewhere prepared for a scare. Polly Morgan’s cinematography gives us a clear sense of the space around the people once the panic starts. We can work out where someone might go next, and worry about their getting there.

The sound is just as carefully judged. Small noises demand attention, and the shifts into Regan Abbott’s experience make listening an uncertain way of knowing what is happening. Marco Beltrami’s score increases the pressure without doing all the work for the creatures. There are moments when the sound gives a familiar scare more force than the writing deserves, but that is a useful skill in a horror film. We keep listening even when the next development seems fairly obvious.

Millicent Simmonds gives Regan Abbott the firmness the story needs. She makes decisions feel considered, and makes the danger matter without continually advertising fear. Cillian Murphy, as Emmett, is an effective partner: their scenes hold our attention before anything threatening enters them. Emily Blunt’s Evelyn Abbott and Noah Jupe’s Marcus Abbott keep the family feeling vulnerable, although the writing gives its actors too little room between emergencies. The younger performances supply much of the emotional weight that the script leaves them to find.

Michael P. Shawver’s editing keeps the separate lines of action clear, carrying anxiety from one to another. The cross-cutting is skilful, although being moved briskly between predicaments sometimes makes the people feel as though they are waiting for their next turn. John Krasinski’s script also relies on choices that seem arranged to get another suspense sequence started. The wider threats are not all given enough attention to become interesting in themselves. These weaknesses seldom stop a scene working, but they leave less to think about once the immediate danger has passed.

By the standards of a creature thriller, the basic suspense is handled with care. The action does sometimes press too hard, giving the creatures enough exposure to make them less frightening. And the wider story has little to add about a family we still want to follow. If the genre is yours, Millicent Simmonds and the precision of the scares are good reasons to accept the thinner story. Save the conversation for afterwards.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
18
Mixed
10
Negative
2

Most critics find A Quiet Place Part II a tense, skilfully made sequel, with praise clustering around its sound design and Millicent Simmonds’s performance. The reviews repeatedly credit Krasinski’s visual storytelling and carefully staged set pieces with sustaining suspense, even when the premise feels familiar. Simmonds gives the family story emotional weight, while the younger cast receives broad approval. For the more enthusiastic critics, the wider setting offers fresh scares without losing affection for the characters.

The main disagreement concerns how much survives beyond the tension. Several reviews find the storytelling thinner, more contrived or less intimate than before, though these reservations do not prevent most from recommending it. The spread is wide, but even the strongest dissenters acknowledge the craft: The Guardian praises the pacing and sound while finding little soul, and The New Yorker admires the small suspenseful details but finds the characterisation inadequate.

Vulture
28 May 2021 · Bilge Ebiri
90*

Ebiri praises the sequel as a taut, effective thriller and a confident work of filmmaking. He singles out Krasinski’s deft visual storytelling and carefully calibrated use of sound and tension.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
18 May 2021 · B+ · Kate Erbland
83

Erbland finds the sequel satisfying, balancing thrills with expanded emotional stakes and a wider world. She praises its heart-pounding set pieces and the film’s affection for its family, while noting that one broader development feels less suited to the franchise’s intimate feel.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
19 May 2021 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
82*

O'Sullivan finds the sequel hugely satisfying despite less consistent writing and some familiar terrain. She especially praises the performances, singling out Millicent Simmonds as utterly compelling.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 May 2021 · David Rooney
82*

Rooney finds the sequel an expertly crafted, intensely suspenseful continuation that remains emotionally absorbing. He especially praises the layered sound design and Marco Beltrami’s score for steadily heightening the tension.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3 June 2021 · Patrick Cremona
80*

Cremona finds the sequel another superbly tense horror film despite a few flaws. He singles out Millicent Simmonds’s star-making performance for praise.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
3 June 2021 · Francesca Steele
80*

Steele finds the sequel thrilling and praises its restraint, sound design and performances. She notes that the story loses focus at times, with one boat-people scene feeling undercooked.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is A Quiet Place Part II worth watching?
A Quiet Place Part II is worth watching if creature thrillers are your sort of evening; we score it 76 for its precise scares, skilful sound and strong performances. Millicent Simmonds gives the danger emotional weight, though contrived decisions and hurried character development make the wider story less convincing than the immediate suspense.
How long is A Quiet Place Part II, and what is it rated?
A Quiet Place Part II runs 1h 37m. It is a science fiction and thriller film.
Where can I watch A Quiet Place Part II in Saudi Arabia?
A Quiet Place Part II is not on any streaming or rental service in Saudi Arabia at the moment. It is available in 53 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is A Quiet Place Part II, and is it suitable for children?
A Quiet Place Part II carries a UK 15 certificate and is unsuitable for children under 15, with frightening creature attacks and sustained tension around noises that attract danger. We found the restaurant attack frightening because its familiar setting makes the violence feel close; even older teenagers who dislike prolonged suspense may find this uncomfortable.
How does A Quiet Place Part II compare to The Birds?
A Quiet Place Part II offers more immediate creature suspense than The Birds, but we recommend The Birds for the more unsettling horror: ordinary places become unsafe without explanation. Both make sound frightening; the sequel benefits from precise staging and Millicent Simmonds, while the earlier film remains disturbing despite aged effects and a thin romance.
What should I watch after A Quiet Place Part II?
After A Quiet Place Part II, try The Birds (1963, Fi1m 86): Ordinary places become unsafe, with sound doing much of the frightening work. Then Tremors (1990, Fi1m 82): More jokes, equally careful geography, and creatures that make careless movement costly; and Under the Shadow (2016, Fi1m 80): A mother protects her daughter as familiar domestic spaces become threatening.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Birds (1963, Fi1m 86)Ordinary places become unsafe, with sound doing much of the frightening work.

  2. Wait Until Dark (1967) · not reviewed yetA confined thriller that makes the limits of perception painfully important.

  3. Tremors (1990, Fi1m 82)More jokes, equally careful geography, and creatures that make careless movement costly.

  4. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetAnother family faces a creature, with more unruly humour and political anger.

  5. Under the Shadow (2016, Fi1m 80)A mother protects her daughter as familiar domestic spaces become threatening.