Film review

After Earth

2013 · Directed by M. Night Shyamalan · 1h 40m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA father-son jungle adventure with the conversational warmth of a compulsory training course

Science FictionActionAdventure

A crash strands Kitai Raige (Jaden Smith) and his father, Cypher Raige (Will Smith), on a future Earth hostile to human life. Cypher can offer little direct help, leaving Kitai to face the jungle and its dangerous animals. Staying alive means acting under pressure while dealing with a father who treats fear as something to be controlled. Their strained relationship is part of a family story that also includes Faia Raige (Sophie Okonedo). Kitai needs to make his way through unfamiliar country, with the dangers around him made harder to manage by the demands of his father.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

M. Night Shyamalan’s science-fiction survival film gives Jaden Smith plenty of danger and little useful dialogue. A few handsome images interrupt a dull father-son lesson in courage that struggles to get its jungle adventure moving.

After Earth wants to turn a boy’s struggle to survive into a lesson about managing fear, with his father providing the instruction. M. Night Shyamalan directs it with a seriousness that leaves little space for surprise or pleasure, and the result is a poor adventure. A crash strands Kitai Raige (Jaden Smith) and Cypher Raige (Will Smith) on a future Earth where the animals are dangerous and the family relationship is already difficult. That is enough to start a survival film, but this one keeps asking us to concentrate on the lesson.

The story is credited to Will Smith, with a screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan and Gary Whitta, and its central difficulty is the way these two people speak. Cypher’s sternness is easy to understand; the dialogue does little to suggest what Kitai might find worth loving beneath it. Exchanges about fear and duty make the father sound as though he is assessing the boy rather than trying to reach him. There is a worthwhile subject here, a child learning to act without constant parental direction, but the writing states it so insistently that we have little left to discover in the performances.

Jaden Smith makes an effort to give Kitai’s anxiety some force, and the visible strain occasionally helps a story about a boy expected to do too much. The performance becomes less convincing when the dialogue insists on explaining feelings that his face has already supplied. Will Smith has the more passive part, and plays the father’s reserve so firmly that even their disagreements struggle to generate much energy. Both performances remain hemmed in by the solemn dialogue.

The physical setting offers more to enjoy. Peter Suschitzky’s cinematography gives the wilderness enough beauty to make us wish we could look around without another lesson arriving. Thomas E. Sanders’s production design also catches the eye, although the polished futuristic sets tell us little about the people who use them. The attention to animals and their surroundings is welcome; the computer-generated threats themselves are less persuasive, especially when the encounters begin to repeat.

We were bored by the jungle chases, because each new danger seemed to demand the same anxious response without making the journey more interesting. Steven Rosenblum’s editing does not give those encounters enough momentum to overcome their familiarity. James Newton Howard’s score supplies urgency more reliably than the action does, leaving the music to insist that something exciting is happening. The quieter passages work better, when the direction gives us time to wonder what might be nearby instead of pressing the point.

A survival adventure can work with a simple route and a small cast if the next obstacle feels uncertain or the people become better company. Here the plotting is obvious and the emotional instructions are repeated, so the modest 100-minute running time still feels stretched. Most critics have found it dull, and we agree, although the care in parts of the visual design gives us something to enjoy between the lectures. If the hostile-Earth premise is the attraction, be prepared for long stretches of solemn family instruction.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

36
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
18

Most critics find After Earth a sluggish science-fiction survival story, with little excitement in its action or conviction in its father-son drama. The limited praise clusters around moments of visual invention, the hostile future Earth and occasional stretches of suspense. Some reviews also find promise in Jaden Smith’s performance, though that view is far from shared. The prevailing complaints concern predictable plotting, stilted dialogue and performances that struggle to make the relationship matter.

The disagreement is chiefly over how much those scattered strengths count for. Empire appreciates the science-fiction concepts despite finding the characters weak, while several harsher reviews also fault the effects and production design. RogerEbert.com provides the clearest dissent, finding a thoughtful moral tale and praising the imagined ecosystem and convincing animals. The spread is wide, but the negative majority is decisive: most critics see the lessons about fear and growing up as laborious rather than moving.

RogerEbert.com
31 May 2013 · Matt Zoller Seitz
70*

The film is a lovely surprise and a special moral tale disguised as a sci-fi blockbuster, spectacular and wise despite not being a classic. It singles out the fully imagined ecosystem and real-feeling animals for praise amid the father-son survival story.

Read the full review →
Empire
2 June 2013 · Kim Newman
60*

The review finds the film visually striking with inventive sci-fi concepts about a hostile future Earth, but criticizes the clunky father-son drama, weak characters, and uninspired dialogue.

Read the full review →
Vulture
31 May 2013 · David Edelstein
55*

By recent Shyamalan standards the film is surprisingly not horrible, though it lacks distinctive twists and feels like a hired-hand vehicle for the Smiths. Some visuals and tension-building are effective, but the simpleminded setup and overemoting undermine it.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Alan Jones
40

The plodding plot is told in unimaginative broad strokes with stilted dialogue from Jaden Smith. It is a by-the-numbers survival story with contrived emotion, glittering sets and repetitive CGI peril.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 June 2013 · Tom Huddleston
40*

The father-son project is not as bad as feared, with Jaden Smith showing charisma and some nice visual design. However, Shyamalan's direction results in sluggish action and the film lacks ambition, becoming just another tedious jungle chase movie.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
30 May 2013
35*

An intriguing but decidedly underwhelming mixture of genres that delivers a trite sci-fi adventure, probably too intense for younger viewers and not sophisticated enough for adults. Shyamalan shows some ability to build suspense in the second half but noble intentions are not enough to overcome the scattershot execution and limited performances.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The Black Stallion poster

The Black Stallion

1979 · A boy’s survival story that trusts animals, landscape and silence to hold us.

Walkabout poster85

Walkabout

1971 · Young people in an unfamiliar wilderness, with far more curiosity about their surroundings.

Hunt for the Wilderpeople poster82

Hunt for the Wilderpeople

2016 · A reluctant guardian and a runaway boy find trouble and affection in the bush.

Prospect poster

Prospect

2018 · A young traveller faces a hostile landscape where survival means judging adults carefully.

Theeb poster

Theeb

2014 · A boy crosses dangerous desert country in an adventure that makes uncertainty matter.