Loulou (Gérard Depardieu) and Nelly (Isabelle Huppert) sit close together at a counter
Film review

Loulou

1980 · Directed by Maurice Pialat · 1h 46m

In a sentenceA husband who talks, a lover who sleeps till noon, and a film that will not pick a side

Paris, around 1980. Nelly (Isabelle Huppert) is married to André (Guy Marchand), who runs the advertising agency she works for and who tells her how to dress, when to leave and whom to talk to. In a dance hall one night he slaps her in front of everyone. Across the floor is Loulou (Gérard Depardieu), a big man in a leather jacket with no job, no flat and a spell in prison behind him. Nelly dances with him, goes back to his hotel room and does not come home. André arrives the next day to fetch her. She stays. What follows is the first weeks of a life with a man who sleeps till noon, borrows from his friends, wants her constantly and offers nothing else.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Maurice Pialat’s film about a woman who walks out of a comfortable marriage for an idle, affectionate layabout is rough, funny and unusually honest. It has no plot to speak of and barely misses one. Huppert and Depardieu are the reason to watch.

Maurice Pialat’s Loulou begins with a slap in a dance hall and never gets much more organised than that. Nelly (Isabelle Huppert) has a husband, André (Guy Marchand), who employs her at his advertising agency and cannot stop telling her how to behave. Across the floor is Loulou (Gérard Depardieu): leather jacket, no work, no plans. She goes home with him, and the film spends the next 106 minutes on what happens when a woman decides that a man who does nothing is better company than a man who does everything. It is rough, funny and honest, and it refuses to tell us whether she was right.

The script, by Pialat and Arlette Langmann, has no plot in the usual sense. There are mornings in hotel rooms, evenings with Loulou’s friends, a return to the office because somebody has to pay for the hotel, and André turning up with his dignity in pieces. Yann Dedet cuts into scenes after they have started and out of them before they have finished, so an argument arrives at full volume and ends with nobody having won. It is disorienting for ten minutes and then it feels like the only honest way to show two people who have not decided anything either.

Depardieu is enormous here and he uses it gently. Loulou eats, sleeps, drinks with his mates and wants Nelly whenever she is nearby, and Depardieu plays him without a trace of menace. He is not a brute; he is a large child who is kind when he remembers to be. When Nelly asks him what he intends to do about money he looks at her as if the question were in another language. Huppert plays Nelly small and watchful and completely stubborn. She says very little and her face does the work, and what her face says, mostly, is that she knows exactly how this looks and is doing it anyway.

We expected to be on the film’s side against André and found we were not, quite. Marchand plays him as a man who is right about everything, the money, the future, Loulou’s character, and who loses because being right has never made anyone want to go to bed with him. There is a scene in the hotel where he tries to reason Nelly home, politely, in his good coat, while Loulou lies half asleep behind her, and we winced for him and then were surprised at how much. Marchand gives him no dignity and does not ask for our pity, which is why we felt it.

Jacques Loiseleux and Pierre-William Glenn share the camera credit, and the film has a single look regardless: rooms too small for Depardieu, lit by whatever lamp is already on, the camera close enough that a shrug fills the frame. The dance hall glows in cheap colour and the hotel is brown. There is no score. The only music is what plays in the club and on the radio, so silence sits on the arguments with nothing to soften it. Dorothée Nonn keeps Loulou in the same jacket throughout and lets Nelly’s clothes from her old life get slowly creased. Max Berto, Alain Alitbol and Jean-Pierre Sarrazin give André a flat with taste and Loulou a room with a bed and a sink, and the film never needs to say anything about class because the walls have said it.

It does sprawl. A long family lunch in the country, a break-in that Loulou’s friend Jean-Claude (Jean-Claude Meilland) drags him towards, a job that comes to nothing: Pialat lets each scene run to its natural length and some of them have no natural length. Around the eighty-minute mark we lost the thread of who owed whom what and suspected the film had too. Pialat’s refusal to shape his material is the point, and it is also a cost, and here the cost shows.

He made À nos amours three years later and it is the tighter film, with the same appetite for people saying the unsayable across a dinner table. Loulou is baggier and warmer. Watch it with someone you have argued with about money. It will not tell you who was right, and by the end you may have stopped being sure yourself.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
2
Mixed
2
Negative
0
Variety
31 December 1979 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the couple engaging and sees the film as a luminous, modern continuation of naturalistic French drama. It singles out the humor that arises from situations and character.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw calls the film effortlessly watchable, giving it a positive verdict. The page singles out its watchability but offers no specific element as the reason.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 October 1980
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also provides no basis for identifying what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· Wally Hammond
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the accessible text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. No specific praise or complaint is available in the provided material.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Loulou worth watching?
Loulou is worth watching for anyone who can do without a plot and wants two actors left alone in small rooms, and we scored it 80. Huppert and Depardieu are the reason to see it; Pialat refuses to tell us whether Nelly was right to leave her husband, and the film sags around the eighty-minute mark. It suits patient viewers, not anyone waiting for something to happen.
How long is Loulou, and what is it rated?
Loulou runs 1h 46m. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Loulou in Mexico?
Loulou is not on any streaming or rental service in Mexico at the moment. It is available in 6 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Loulou compare to Fish Tank?
Loulou and Fish Tank share a rough, unflattering light and people making decisions they cannot defend, but they are different animals. Pialat's film is looser and warmer, with no plot and no side taken; Arnold's is tense and shaped, occasionally too pointedly. Fish Tank is the tighter film and the easier one to follow, Loulou the more honest about people who have decided nothing.

Cast

Awards

César Award for Best Actress, 1981

Nominated
César Award for Best Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. À nos amours (1983) · not on Fi1m yetPialat again, tighter and crueller, with a family that fights at the table.

  2. A Woman Under the Influence (1974) · not on Fi1m yetCassavetes lets a marriage argue itself hoarse and never tidies up after it.

  3. Wanda (1970) · not on Fi1m yetA woman drifts away from her life with a man who deserves less.

  4. Scenes from a Marriage (1973) · not on Fi1m yetBergman’s couple talk for hours and still cannot explain what happened.

  5. Fish Tank (2009, Fi1m 85)Arnold’s Essex estate has the same rough light and worse decisions.

Loulou (1980) review: Pialat’s rough, honest film about leaving (Mexico) | Fi1m