Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike) raising a white cube beside a glass display case
Film review

Now You See Me: Now You Don't

2025 · Directed by Ruben Fleischer · 1h 52m · SK 12

In a sentenceEvery trick is explained afterwards in a flashback, which is the one thing a magician is never meant to do

The Four Horsemen, the stage magicians who once robbed a bank from a stage in front of a paying audience, have gone quiet. Three younger magicians, Bosco (Dominic Sessa), June (Ariana Greenblatt) and Charlie (Justice Smith), have grown up on their footage and stage a stunt designed to get their attention. It works, and J. Daniel Atlas (Jesse Eisenberg) finds himself with a new team, soon joined by Merritt McKinney (Woody Harrelson), Jack Wilder (Dave Franco), Henley Reeves (Isla Fisher) and Lula (Lizzy Caplan). The job takes them across several countries towards a diamond belonging to Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike), whose fortune has not been honestly made. Morgan Freeman returns as Thaddeus Bradley. Ruben Fleischer directs.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Ruben Fleischer’s third Horsemen film is quick, glossy and busy, and Rosamund Pike is having a wonderful time as the villain. But it explains every illusion the moment it is over, and a trick you are told about afterwards has not fooled anyone.

Twelve years after Now You See Me (2013) turned four stage magicians into bank robbers, Ruben Fleischer gets the Horsemen back together and hands them three apprentices. The prize is a diamond. The mark is Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike), a woman with a great deal of money and no interest in explaining where it came from. That is plenty for a heist film, and for half an hour Now You See Me: Now You Don’t moves like a franchise that knows exactly what its audience has come for. The difficulty is that they have come for magic, and the film keeps almost none in stock.

The recruits are Bosco (Dominic Sessa), June (Ariana Greenblatt) and Charlie (Justice Smith), young magicians who grew up watching the Horsemen’s old shows. Sessa plays Bosco as a boy who has never been told no and is curious to find out how it feels. Greenblatt is quick and unimpressed, and wins nearly every exchange with the elders. Smith gives Charlie the nerves of the one person in the group who has thought about consequences. The three of them have an easy rhythm, and when the film lets them work a room on their own it is at its lightest.

The old guard arrive to be teased about their age and to tease back. Jesse Eisenberg’s J. Daniel Atlas still talks faster than anyone else in the scene and still expects to be listened to; Eisenberg has grown into the part, and the arrogance is now funny rather than grating. Woody Harrelson, Dave Franco and Isla Fisher slide back in as if they had never left, and Lizzy Caplan’s Lula turns up too. That makes eight magicians on one team, and the script cannot find work for all of them, so several stand at the back and react.

Pike is the reason to stay. She plays Vanderberg with an accent she is plainly enjoying, smiles through her most menacing lines, holds every pause a beat longer than anyone else on screen, and treats the Horsemen as a mild inconvenience. We laughed out loud twice, both times at Pike, and both times at a line that on the page cannot have been more than a threat. It is a big performance in a film that otherwise plays small, and it shows up how little the rest of the cast has been given to do.

George Richmond shoots it bright and glossy, every surface polished, every city at golden hour, which suits a story about people who want to be looked at. David Scheunemann’s best work is a mansion built for deception, with rooms that are not the size they appear and doors that open onto the wrong places; the set piece staged there is the one stretch where the film feels like a magic show rather than a chase. Sophie Canale puts Pike in sharp tailoring and the young trio in clothes they can run in. Brian Tyler’s score is brass and drums pushed forward, and it announces a trick slightly before the trick arrives.

Stacey Schroeder cuts fast, and she cuts in a particular way that is the film’s real problem. Every illusion is followed by a flashback explaining how it was done, usually with a wire, a double or a piece of technology nobody had mentioned. Around the hour mark we noticed we had stopped trying to work anything out, because the film would shortly tell us, and we felt, plainly, cheated. A magic trick you are told about afterwards is not a trick; it is an alibi.

Four names share the screenplay credit, Michael Lesslie, Paul Wernick, Seth Grahame-Smith and Rhett Reese, with Lesslie and Eric Warren Singer on story, and it reads that way: every scene has a quip, a piece of exposition and a callback, and few have anything else. Reese and Wernick wrote Zombieland (2009) for Fleischer, and the same reflex is here, the joke arriving before the moment has landed. Ocean’s Eleven (2001) got away with explaining its heist because Soderbergh let us watch the mechanism work in real time. This film hides the mechanism, then shows us a diagram.

It runs 112 minutes and carries a 12A, and it will pass a wet evening with teenagers who liked the first two, who will be glad of the old faces and quick to like the new ones. Watch it for Pike, for the mansion and for the trio. Do not try to guess how anything is done; the film would rather you did not, and it will tell you anyway.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
5
Mixed
7
Negative
3

The consensus on Now You See Me: Now You Don’t is mixed, and the spread is wide. Most critics find it fun in the moment and forgotten soon after. The praise clusters on the cast: the returning Horsemen’s ease with one another, the new younger magicians, and above all Rosamund Pike’s villain, whom several reviews single out as the best thing in it. The heist set pieces and quick pacing get credit too.

Reservations gather around the script, which is called exposition-heavy and overcrowded with characters, subplots and cameos, and around illusions that lean on CGI and flashback explanations rather than sleight of hand. The dissent is sharp at the bottom: Empire calls it the weakest entry in the series, The Telegraph finds the tricks flat and the cast smug, and The Times awards its two stars to Pike alone. At the top, The New York Times thinks it may be the best of the three.

Variety
11 November 2025 · Owen Gleiberman
80*

The expanded team of illusionists sustains the series' playful trickery in a worthy third sleight-of-hand thriller that fools the audience while revealing its tricks in a way that only makes them seem trickier. Eisenberg's domineering performance as the megalomaniac leader anchors the generational razzing and good-fun caper.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 November 2025 · B · Caroline Siede
77

The cast's genuine enthusiasm and chemistry make the knowingly ridiculous third entry fun despite its flaws. It doubles down on the magician angle with clever heist sequences and franchise continuity, feeling like a lighter National Treasure with magic.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 November 2025 · Alissa Wilkinson
75*

The third entry gets the band back together, introduces new Gen Z magicians, and updates the villains to crypto bros while delivering globe-trotting fun, quips, and illusions. It is the best in the series or at least a very pleasantly diverting two-ish hours that everyone in the cast seems to enjoy making.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
14 November 2025 · Matt Zoller Seitz
70*

The film understands that its real trick is staying ahead of the audience with plot twists rather than visual effects, and it succeeds with humor and a light touch thanks to a strong cast. It reintroduces the Horsemen for a diamond heist while adding younger magicians, though the story evaporates from memory quickly like its predecessors.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 November 2025 · Katie Walsh
65*

The silly, frothy, and ultimately quite stupid (in the best way) globe-trotting adventure is not really about magic but keeps viewers distracted with its fleet pacing and charming new additions. Fleischer knows the winking, campy element and delivers lightweight, harmless entertainment that lets audiences escape reality for a minute.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
11 November 2025 · ★★★ · Kevin Harley
60

The critic describes the film as a busily disposable but fitfully fun reunion of legacy and new characters, praising the witty set pieces and charismatic cast while complaining about the self-satisfied, exposition-heavy script that muffles the magic.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Now You See Me: Now You Don't worth watching?
Now You See Me: Now You Don't is worth watching only for people who enjoyed the first two Horsemen films and want the old faces back, and we scored it 57. Rosamund Pike is a pleasure as the villain and the three young recruits have an easy rhythm, but every illusion is explained in a flashback the moment it is over, which spoils the fun of guessing.
How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't, and what is it rated?
Now You See Me: Now You Don't runs 1h 52m and is rated 12 by the SK in Slovakia. It is a crime and thriller film.
Where can I watch Now You See Me: Now You Don't in Slovakia?
Now You See Me: Now You Don't is not on any streaming or rental service in Slovakia at the moment. It is available in 26 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Now You See Me: Now You Don't, and is it suitable for children?
Now You See Me: Now You Don't carries a 12A certificate and is a glossy heist thriller rather than a frightening one, with nothing in it we would warn a teenager away from. Its villain is menacing in a smiling, theatrical way, and the danger is chases and stunts rather than blood. Younger children will likely lose track of the plot before anything upsets them.
How does Now You See Me: Now You Don't compare to The Sting?
Now You See Me: Now You Don't is the faster and busier film, but The Sting is the better one, because it lets you enjoy being fooled rather than explaining each trick afterwards. The earlier film gives Newman and Redford room to be funny and mostly earns its length; the new one has eight magicians and work for about four. Choose the Horsemen for a teenager, the con men for anyone else.
What should I watch after Now You See Me: Now You Don't?
After Now You See Me: Now You Don't, try The Sting (1973, Fi1m 85): Con men who are actually good at it, and a film that lets you enjoy being fooled. Then Nine Queens (2000, Fi1m 83): Argentine swindlers on a Buenos Aires day; the trick is in the writing, not the effects; and Ocean's Eleven (2001, Fi1m 80): The model for every glossy ensemble heist since, and still the one with the best rhythm.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Rififi (1955) · not reviewed yetA heist done in silence for half an hour, and nobody has to explain it afterwards.

  2. The Sting (1973, Fi1m 85)Con men who are actually good at it, and a film that lets you enjoy being fooled.

  3. Nine Queens (2000, Fi1m 83)Argentine swindlers on a Buenos Aires day; the trick is in the writing, not the effects.

  4. Ocean's Eleven (2001, Fi1m 80)The model for every glossy ensemble heist since, and still the one with the best rhythm.

  5. The Prestige (2006, Fi1m 82)Two stage magicians, one obsession, and a film that understands what a reveal costs.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever