Three sailors talk with a woman in a striped skirt outside a city storefront
Film review

On the Town

1949 · Directed by Gene Kelly, Stanley Donen · 1h 38m

In a sentenceThree sailors get a day’s leave, and New York’s women take charge of the itinerary

Three sailors have twenty-four hours of shore leave in New York. Gabey (Gene Kelly), Chip (Frank Sinatra) and Ozzie (Jules Munshin) set out to see the city, but Gabey is soon distracted by a subway poster of Ivy Smith (Vera-Ellen), the month’s Miss Turnstiles. While he wants to find her, Chip encounters taxi driver Brunhilde Esterhazy (Betty Garrett), who takes charge of more than the sightseeing. At the natural history museum, Claire Huddesen (Ann Miller) finds Ozzie worth studying. A guidebook offers Chip an orderly day; the women and Gabey’s search make keeping to it increasingly unlikely.

Fi1m review

Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen make a musical carried by athletic dancing, lively location shooting and a cast with enough charm to disguise a slight story. The romances need more substance, but we recommend the company.

On the Town is a brisk, generous musical with one substantial limitation: its romances are thinner than the performers deserve. Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen direct as though every pause needs a good reason, and for most of its 98 minutes we are happy to keep moving. Three sailors have a day’s leave in New York and rather more confidence than experience. The deadline helps: nobody has time to spend long wondering what any of this means.

The opening musical montage makes the strongest case for the whole enterprise. Harold Rosson’s location photography gives the dancing space and a busy setting, with the city claiming its share of our attention. Ralph E. Winters cuts for momentum without making the performers seem hurried, so that we can enjoy the physical effort as well as the succession of places. We grinned at it: the combination of athletic dancing and actual streets makes a sightseeing trip feel absurdly urgent.

Gene Kelly’s Gabey supplies the romantic yearning, and his dancing makes that yearning easier to believe than the screenplay does. He can make eagerness look attractive without making the man seem entirely sensible. Frank Sinatra gives Chip a lighter, less forceful presence, which is useful beside so much physical assurance. Jules Munshin’s Ozzie is broader, occasionally too broad for our taste, but the three work well together; nobody appears to be waiting politely for his own turn.

The women keep the comedy from settling into a sailors’ outing with decorative company. Betty Garrett gives Brunhilde Esterhazy a firmness that makes her pursuit of Chip funny without requiring an apology for it. Ann Miller’s Claire Huddesen brings an equally welcome appetite, and her dancing has a precision that holds our attention even when the surrounding joke is slight. Vera-Ellen has less comic freedom as Ivy Smith, but she gives the romantic scenes a gentleness that the more boisterous pairings need.

Betty Comden and Adolph Green’s screenplay is efficient about getting these people together and less interested in making them complicated. Gabey’s fascination with a woman on a poster is a workable excuse for a search, but it cannot supply much emotional depth by itself. The film tends to rely on the cast to fill that gap. They mostly manage it, though a little more conversation worth remembering would have made the romances matter beyond the immediate pleasure of the performances.

The music, credited to Roger Edens, Lennie Hayton and Leonard Bernstein, keeps that pleasure readily available. The musical passages have a buoyancy that suits the rapid attachments, and the performers keep words and movement part of the same conversation. What matters is how readily the film can move from comic insistence to a softer romantic mood without losing its pace. The score and Ralph E. Winters’s editing help sustain the sense that these people have somewhere else to be.

By the standards of the screen musical, this is particularly good at making accomplished people seem spontaneously happy. The effort is considerable, but watching it never feels like attending a demonstration of how difficult dancing can be. Its emotional ambitions are modest, and that remains a fair reservation. Choose it when an evening of movement, flirtation and cheerful impatience sounds sufficient.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

75
Positive
3
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
85*

Nathan finds the film charming, thrilling and delightful. He especially praises the athletic dance numbers and the unusual, wonderful location shooting.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
9 December 1949 · Bosley Crowther
75*

Crowther’s headline presents the film as an entertaining musical. He singles out its appeal to both the eye and the ear.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1949 · Variety Staff
75*

Variety’s review is positive, finding that the filmmakers’ enthusiasm gives the picture its strongest asset. It singles out the opening musical montage and the lively pacing that continues through the film.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· SG
64*

The available page labels this as a film review, but provides no critic verdict. No specific element of the film is available to identify as praise or complaint.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is On the Town worth watching?
On the Town is worth watching for its athletic dancing, lively New York locations and charming cast; we score it 84 out of 100. We find the romances thinner than the performers deserve, but recommend it when an evening of movement, flirtation and brisk musical comedy sounds sufficient.
How long is On the Town, and what is it rated?
On the Town runs 1h 38m. It is a comedy and romance film.
Where can I watch On the Town in Colombia?
On the Town is available to rent from Apple TV from CO$9900.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does On the Town compare to Strictly Ballroom?
On the Town is our choice for brisk musical comedy and sightseeing, while Strictly Ballroom makes its familiar courtship matter more through the dancing. We find the sailors’ romances slight despite the cast’s charm; the ballroom romance offers stronger romantic involvement, though its comedy can shout and its story holds few surprises.
What should I watch after On the Town?
After On the Town, try The Band Wagon (1953, Fi1m 84): For dancing that makes romantic friction funny without explaining every feeling. Then Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83): For romantic comedy in which the dancing gives stubborn people away.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1950

Won
Best Original Musical Score

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Band Wagon (1953, Fi1m 84)For dancing that makes romantic friction funny without explaining every feeling.

  2. The Young Girls of Rochefort (1967) · not on Fi1m yetAnother town full of missed connections, bright company and impatient dancers.

  3. Strictly Ballroom (1992, Fi1m 83)For romantic comedy in which the dancing gives stubborn people away.

  4. Swing Girls (2004) · not on Fi1m yetA scrappy musical ensemble builds confidence through practice, mistakes and shared pleasure.

  5. It's Always Fair Weather (1955) · not on Fi1m yetFor a more rueful reunion, with dancing that remains wonderfully alert.