a woman in a pink gown standing in a doorway with a man behind her
Film review

Phantom Thread

2017 · Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson · 2h 10m

In a sentenceBeautiful dresses, difficult company, and no guarantee that being in love will improve anyone’s manners

In 1950s London, couturier Reynolds Woodcock (Daniel Day-Lewis) wants to make dresses without interference. His sister, Cyril Woodcock (Lesley Manville), shares a life organised around his work. When he meets Alma Elson (Vicky Krieps), he finds a muse and begins a romance, expecting her to accommodate his habits. Alma has wishes of her own, and admiration does not make her willing to accept every condition he imposes. Between Reynolds’s exacting standards, Cyril’s authority and Alma’s determination to be heard, the couturier’s carefully managed household begins to feel crowded.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Paul Thomas Anderson makes a funny, disquieting romance about a dressmaker who expects love on his own terms. The enclosed setting can grow airless, but Daniel Day-Lewis, Vicky Krieps and Lesley Manville keep us absorbed.

Paul Thomas Anderson’s Phantom Thread is a funny, unsettling romance, and we recommend it with a warning about the company it keeps. Reynolds Woodcock makes dresses and expects the people around him to accommodate the work. The film takes his talent seriously while looking closely at how he uses it to justify his behaviour. The women expected to supply the necessary patience have their own say, and we soon have reasons to listen to everyone involved.

Daniel Day-Lewis gives Reynolds Woodcock a fastidiousness that can look reasonable until someone else has to live beside it. His restraint matters: a broader performance would make the man easy to dismiss, whereas here we can understand the attraction without excusing the behaviour. We laughed at his petulance, then felt uncomfortable about how much deference he could command with it. The humour comes from an accomplished adult expecting his wishes to settle a disagreement, and the actor never begs us to find that charming.

Vicky Krieps makes Alma Elson an equal presence without turning her into a ready-made corrective to a selfish man. She makes Alma’s admiration and stubbornness equally convincing, so loving Reynolds never seems to mean accepting his terms. Lesley Manville, as Cyril Woodcock, is just as important: her authority gives the romance a third person whose judgement cannot be ignored. The performances keep us interested in what each person wants, even when we would rather they asked for it differently.

The production design by Mark Tildesley makes the couture surroundings imposing enough to explain why somebody might accept those terms, at least for a while. Mark Bridges’s costumes give Reynolds’s skill something we can actually look at, a necessary courtesy in a film asking us to take an artist seriously. Paul Thomas Anderson’s cinematography keeps those surroundings intimate, so the people remain more compelling than the finery. The enclosed compositions also make it easy to understand why someone might want a little more room.

Dylan Tichenor’s editing handles the shifts between courtship, comedy and hostility without making them feel like separate films. He allows the performances to establish the tension instead of hurrying us towards the next confrontation. Jonny Greenwood’s melodic score gives the romance an emotional warmth that its participants do not always manage between themselves. It is an important contribution: the music helps us understand why these people might stay together despite the difficulty of their conversations.

There are stretches when the enclosed setting becomes oppressive, and some disputes establish a selfishness we have already understood. Alma’s determination also feels more fully explored than her life beyond this relationship, which narrows our attachment to her. These are limits that matter, particularly in a romance asking us to invest so much in its central pair. Yet within the genre’s familiar story of the demanding artist and his muse, Paul Thomas Anderson allows an unusual amount of comedy without treating desire as a joke.

Give its 130 minutes an evening without distractions. The small changes in manner deserve attention, and the humour is liable to pass by if we are waiting only for the next declaration. We recommend it warmly, though perhaps not as a peace offering after a domestic argument.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

87
Positive
17
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics warmly praise Phantom Thread as a darkly comic romance about obsession and control. Daniel Day-Lewis’s fastidious designer draws consistent admiration, while Vicky Krieps receives particular credit for making his partner equally compelling; Lesley Manville’s supporting performance also earns notice. The reviews repeatedly praise Anderson’s precise direction, detailed period setting and movement between cruelty, comedy and tenderness. Jonny Greenwood’s score attracts strong praise, with The Hollywood Reporter identifying it as the largest individual contribution to the film’s impact.

The disagreement concerns how much feeling comes through that careful construction, rather than the quality of the acting or craft. Most critics find the central relationship moving or psychologically absorbing, but Collider finds it short on emotional depth. The New Yorker offers the clearest dissent, admiring the workmanship while finding the enclosed atmosphere oppressive and sickly. Reservations remain limited within a strongly positive consensus.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Emma Simmonds
100

The critic calls it a divine, poetically scripted melodrama that examines the artist’s vulnerability and emotional upheaval in an intimate portrait, especially fitting as a potential swan song for Day-Lewis.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
1 February 2018 · ★★★★★ · Matthew Turner
100

Day-Lewis delivers a magnificent performance as the fastidious designer Reynolds Woodcock, retiring in style, while newcomer Vicky Krieps is perfectly cast in a twisted Hitchcockian romance full of suspense from everyday details. The critic praises the strong supporting work, sumptuous score and design, calling it a cinematic treat.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 December 2017 · ★★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
100

The critic lauds the film’s exploration of obsession and power shifts in the romance, noting the sophisticated script, strong performances, and the director’s fun handling of the characters’ battle of wills.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
7 December 2017 · A- · A.A. Dowd
90

The critic finds the film an exquisite, tastefully crafted intimate love story that masks a perverse and moving relationship study beneath its mannered elegance. He singles out the strong performances, especially Daniel Day-Lewis and newcomer Vicky Krieps, and Anderson's refined formal control.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
2 February 2018 · Matthew Norman
85*

The critic hails Daniel Day-Lewis's sublime swansong performance as a fragile, neurotic perfectionist couturier and calls the film a profoundly engaging psychological examination of mutual dependency and power shifts in a warped love affair. He singles out the film's atmospheric visuals, unsaid details, and rich emotional layers for praise.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Jonathan Romney
85*

The critic describes the film as a classical melodrama and chamber piece about a toxic family triangle in 1950s couture, praising its opulent yet intimate execution, nuanced performances (especially the understated Day-Lewis, terrifying Manville, and mischievous Krieps), and masterful unraveling of the artist's mystique.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Phantom Thread worth watching?
Phantom Thread is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a romance with sharp edges, and we scored it 87. Daniel Day-Lewis, Vicky Krieps and Lesley Manville keep us absorbed in a household organised around one man's dressmaking, and the comedy is real. Give it an evening without distractions; the enclosed setting can grow airless, and the humour is easy to miss.
How long is Phantom Thread, and what is it rated?
Phantom Thread runs 2h 10m. It is a drama and romance film.
Where can I watch Phantom Thread in New Zealand?
Phantom Thread is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from NZ$5.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Phantom Thread, and is it suitable for children?
Phantom Thread carries a UK 15 certificate, and its difficulty lies in manners, not violence or fright. The unease comes from a demanding man expecting deference and two women declining to give it, which is unsettling in the way a tense dinner is unsettling. Younger children would find little to alarm them and less to hold their attention.
How does Phantom Thread compare to Rebecca?
Phantom Thread and Rebecca both set a romance inside an imposing household where established loyalties resist a newcomer, but they differ in temperature. Hitchcock's film runs on dread and insecurity, while Anderson's is funnier and more evenly matched, with Alma pushing back where Fontaine's heroine shrinks. Rebecca is the stronger film for suspense; Phantom Thread suits anyone who prefers their romance argued rather than feared.
What should I watch after Phantom Thread?
After Phantom Thread, try Rebecca (1940, Fi1m 85): For another imposing household where romance must contend with established loyalties. Then The Piano (1993, Fi1m 88): For a stubborn woman’s desires expressed through music, work and difficult intimacy; and The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89): Another elegant household where apparently settled positions become difficult to maintain.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2018

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Won
Best Costume Design

APRECI Award for Best International Premiere, 2018

Won
APRECI Award for Best International Premiere

FIPRESCI Grand Prix, 2018

Won
FIPRESCI Grand Prix

If you liked this, try…

  1. Rebecca (1940, Fi1m 85)For another imposing household where romance must contend with established loyalties.

  2. The Piano (1993, Fi1m 88)For a stubborn woman’s desires expressed through music, work and difficult intimacy.

  3. The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89)Another elegant household where apparently settled positions become difficult to maintain.

  4. The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant (1972) · not reviewed yetFashion, desire and possessiveness confined to rooms nobody seems willing to leave.

  5. In the Mood for Love (2000, Fi1m 91)For clothes, restrained performances and music that make unspoken longing painfully clear.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever