Film review

Snatch

2000 · Directed by Guy Ritchie · 1h 43m · MPA R

In a sentenceAlan Ford makes organised crime sound like a job with appalling customer service

CrimeComedy

Guy Ritchie’s crime comedy follows overlapping underworld dealings involving bare-knuckle boxing and a diamond. Jason Statham plays Turkish, alongside Stephen Graham as Tommy and Alan Ford as Brick Top. Brad Pitt plays Mickey O’Neil, a bare-knuckle boxer, while Benicio del Toro is Franky Four Fingers. Dennis Farina appears as Avi, Rade Šerbedžija as Boris The Blade and Vinnie Jones as Bullet Tooth Tony. Their encounters unfold through a plot of criminal schemes, banter and violence, as the film moves between members of an ensemble with competing interests.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Guy Ritchie’s Snatch is a brisk, funny crime comedy carried by a well-chosen cast. The plotting keeps us entertained, though the ethnic caricatures and recycled gangland swagger put a limit on the pleasure.

Snatch is a good crime comedy with a troublesome habit of enjoying its own cleverness. Guy Ritchie packs his underworld with people who talk confidently and give us ample reason to doubt them, then keeps their dealings moving quickly enough to sustain the joke. The pleasure comes from watching that confidence survive one complication after another. We need to enjoy the company, because there is not much here to persuade us to care about anyone.

Jason Statham gives Turkish the relatively level delivery this crowded film needs, letting the surrounding performances grow louder without competing for every laugh. Stephen Graham’s Tommy makes useful comic company, but Alan Ford’s Brick Top is the stronger reason to stay. We laughed at Ford’s delivery of the gangland banter, then felt slightly uncomfortable about how easily he had won us over. His matter-of-fact manner allows the threat to register without stopping the comedy for an announcement.

Brad Pitt brings a welcome unpredictability to Mickey O’Neil, the bare-knuckle boxer. So many of these characters seem ready to deliver their allotted joke that his looseness makes a difference: he gives us someone worth watching even when he is not speaking. Ritchie sometimes appears to think a memorable nickname will do most of the work of creating a person. Pitt provides enough presence to make that shortcut less noticeable.

Tim Maurice-Jones’s cinematography gives the gangsters a comic-strip boldness that suits their exaggerated self-importance. The showiness can grow tiring, but it belongs to the same film as these performances, and Ritchie knows how to make a visual flourish serve a joke. Jon Harris’s cross-cutting does more of the essential work, giving the overlapping dealings a rhythm we can follow. He moves between strands with enough assurance that the complicated plotting keeps producing laughs.

Hugo Luczyc-Wyhowski’s production design helps keep this underworld cheerfully unreal, which works for the farce. It does less to suggest that anybody has a life beyond the next criminal transaction, a limitation shared by the script. John Murphy’s music adds another push to the pace, although the cutting hardly needs encouragement. We would have welcomed a little more quiet around some of the dialogue; the cast can hold our attention without quite so much assistance.

The writing is where our reservations become harder to overlook. Ritchie’s ethnic caricatures are lazy, and the film repeatedly asks a recognisable type to stand in for a developed character. There is enough wit in the dialogue to make that unnecessary, which makes it more frustrating when an easy stereotype gets the laugh. The banter also grows mannered in places, with too many people sounding pleased by the shape of their own sentences before they have finished saying them.

Against Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, this is a familiar set of pleasures, and Ritchie has done little to change the formula. The stronger performances justify another visit even when the writing does not supply much surprise. At 103 minutes, Snatch is brisk enough to keep that familiarity from becoming a serious burden. If Ritchie’s talkative gangsters already wear you out, though, adding Brad Pitt is unlikely to cure it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

63
Positive
7
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics find Snatch an entertaining crime comedy, though enthusiasm is far from unanimous. Praise centres on Guy Ritchie’s energetic direction, tangled plotting and comic dialogue, with Brad Pitt the most consistently admired performer and Jason Statham and Alan Ford also earning notice. The favourable reviews enjoy the ensemble and gangland absurdity; even several sceptics acknowledge Pitt’s contribution or the energy of the filmmaking.

The main division is over how much Ritchie’s return to the Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels formula delivers. Some find a sharper, more assured entertainment; others find repetition, predictable characters and camera tricks that have lost their surprise. The spread is wide: Variety considers the writing improved and the cast more evenly matched, while Sight and Sound finds weak writing and little pacing or purpose. The Guardian’s otherwise favourable assessment also objects to ethnic caricatures and feeble satire.

Variety
20 September 2000 · Derek Elley
85*

Elley praises Ritchie for blowing away the sophomore curse with a less flashy but better written and more evenly cast crime seriocomedy that is lighter in tone, cleverly plotted, and entertaining with strong ensemble performances.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · WH
80*

Ritchie's follow-up is an even more craftily concocted underworld entertainment, with Pitt's casting as the bare-knuckle boxer adding significantly to its appeal. The comic tone is risqué and confident, balanced by showman's bravado, neat reversals and hyperbolic buffoonery.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
19 January 2001 · Elvis Mitchell
75*

Mitchell calls the film a spicy, hyper-real comic strip that seizes British gangster machismo with action ferocity and comic potential, giving it a bit more emotional weight while retaining entertaining swagger as everything clicks by the end.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
70*

The critic finds Snatch entertaining but too similar to Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, essentially a remix rather than a fresh follow-up. He praises the performances, especially by Jason Statham, Alan Ford, and Brad Pitt.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 August 2000
70*

Writer-director Guy Ritchie serves up a canny rehash of the ingredients from Lock, Stock, adding bigger budget and star names to the tried formula of dodgy dealings and articulate gangland characters. It delivers cocky banter and bloodshed that admirers will expect, with Pitt good value.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
1 September 2000 · Andrew Pulver
70*

The critic praises Ritchie's frenetic plotting, cross-cutting and stylistic flourishes, along with strong turns from Jason Statham and Brad Pitt. He criticises the film's reliance on ethnic caricatures and feeble satire.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

The Ladykillers poster

The Ladykillers

1955 · A criminal ensemble undone by vanity, with quieter performances and equally poor judgement.

Big Deal on Madonna Street poster

Big Deal on Madonna Street

1958 · Petty criminals attempt more than they can manage, with greater affection for failure.

A Fish Called Wanda poster

A Fish Called Wanda

1988 · Another criminal ensemble whose confidence exceeds its competence, with beautifully timed mutual irritation.

The Mission poster

The Mission

1986 · Try this for gangland camaraderie, dry humour and a welcome reduction in chatter.

In Bruges poster

In Bruges

2008 · The criminal conversations are funny, but the consequences are considerably harder to shrug off.