A man stands beside the wreckage of a plane on a snowy ridge at sunset
Film review

Society of the Snow

2023 · Directed by J. A. Bayona · 2h 23m

In a sentenceWe were prepared for a terrifying plane crash, but not for quite so much tenderness

A plane crashes in the Andes, leaving its survivors stranded in the mountains. Among them are Numa Turcatti (Enzo Vogrincic), Fernando “Nando” Parrado (Agustín Pardella) and Roberto Canessa (Matías Recalt). The damaged aircraft becomes the centre of their immediate struggle to stay alive. Numa and his companions must cope with the crash’s physical consequences while learning how to depend on one another. Fear and disagreements complicate that task. As the survivors begin to organise themselves, looking after each other becomes a practical necessity, while their circumstances put their beliefs and relationships under pressure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

J. A. Bayona’s survival drama is frightening, compassionate and sometimes overlong. The crash is hard to bear, and the attention paid to the survivors’ relationships earns our recommendation despite a repetitive middle.

Society of the Snow is a harrowing, compassionate survival drama that sometimes takes too long to make a point it has already made. J. A. Bayona treats the Andes plane crash as the beginning of a shared ordeal, giving disagreements and acts of care substantial attention alongside physical endurance. That is the right choice for this story. The film asks how frightened people look after one another when none of them can promise that looking after anyone will be enough.

The crash is difficult to sit through, and it should be. Pedro Luque’s claustrophobic photography keeps us close to the people inside the aircraft, while editors Jaume Martí and Andrés Gil make the confusion feel immediate without turning it into an exercise in showing off. We were horrified by the violence and the lack of space in which to escape it. The sequence establishes how vulnerable these bodies are before asking us to watch them endure more.

Alain Bainée’s production design makes the wreck physically convincing, an important consideration when so much depends on believing what these people are enduring. There is little comfort in the mountain views, however striking the photography becomes. Michael Giacchino’s tense score sustains the unease through passages where there is less immediate action. These contributions work together particularly well when the film lets us feel the survivors’ confinement without explaining their predicament again.

Enzo Vogrincic gives Numa Turcatti a watchfulness that helps the drama stay close to individual feeling. Around him, Agustín Pardella as Fernando “Nando” Parrado and Matías Recalt as Roberto Canessa belong to an ensemble whose relationships do much of the film’s work. Getting along becomes a practical necessity, which gives the disagreements weight beyond the usual business of creating conflict. We were moved by the tenderness between people who have so little left to offer. J. A. Bayona allows them to be caring and frightened at the same time.

Survival dramas can become exhausting in their admiration for exceptional resolve, and this film’s interest in mutual dependence is welcome. It takes faith seriously, too, allowing belief to complicate the survivors’ struggle rather than simply provide reassurance. The attention given to their doubts helps prevent the group from becoming a collection of examples of good behaviour under pressure. Occasionally the reverence makes everyone seem a little too solemn, but the performances retain enough uncertainty to hold our attention.

The difficulty comes in the extended middle, where the rhythm begins to repeat. The screenplay by Bernat Vilaplana, Nicolás Casariego Córdoba, J. A. Bayona and Jaime Marques returns too often to explanations of what the suffering means, with recurring narration leaving less for us to discover in the performances. Scenes that ought to hurt begin to feel familiar because the film has already told us how to understand them. We do not need the ordeal made tidier, but we could do with fewer explanations.

The 143-minute running time makes this a demanding evening, especially for anyone who finds screen suffering difficult. For us, the care between the survivors justifies staying with it through the slower stretches. Choose it when neither of you needs something easy.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

73
Positive
17
Mixed
4
Negative
1

Most critics find Society of the Snow a harrowing, compassionate survival drama, with praise clustering around Bayona’s handling of the crash and his attention to the survivors’ bonds. The photography, editing and sound make the disaster feel frighteningly immediate, while the performances give the prolonged ordeal a human focus. Many reviews value the film’s spiritual concerns and its refusal to turn suffering into spectacle, finding tenderness in the camaraderie and disagreements.

The reservations concern pace and psychological depth, though the spread runs from strongly moved to distinctly unconvinced. The Hollywood Reporter finds that the extended middle section drags, while IndieWire regards the characters as too psychologically schematic for the emotion to register fully. Slant Magazine offers the sharpest dissent, arguing that the reverence and restraint praised elsewhere weaken the impact. Even among the less persuaded critics, the disaster sequences and haunting visual details earn respect.

Vulture
5 January 2024 · Roxana Hadadi
90*

Hadadi finds the film transcendent, praising its thoughtful exploration of faith and survival. She especially commends the performances and the tenderness among the survivors.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 December 2023 · Amon Warmann
85*

Warmann finds the film affecting, praising Bayona’s handling of a grand survival story with an intimate human focus. He especially singles out the visceral crash sequence and the deeply felt camaraderie and disagreements among the survivors.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
16 February 2024 · 3/4/4 · Emma Fraser
80

Fraser calls it a visceral, harrowing survival drama that is also deeply human. She praises Bayona’s striking visual spectacle and the compassion with which the survivors’ ordeal is depicted.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Matt Glasby
80

Glasby finds the survival thriller surprising and sensitive, and notably faithful to the historical ordeal. He praises its close adherence to survivors’ accounts and its use of interviews with those who lived through it.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
2 January 2024 · BFI
80*

The review regards the film as a compassionate and emotionally powerful retelling of the disaster. It particularly praises the balance between the crash’s dynamic action and the survivors’ prolonged psychological and emotional struggles.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 September 2023 · festival review · Guy Lodge
75*

Lodge finds the film gripping and emotionally powerful, though its story offers few surprises. He praises Bayona’s visceral crash sequence and the film’s humane focus on the survivors’ bonds.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Society of the Snow worth watching?
Society of the Snow is worth watching for its compassionate treatment of survival and convincing ensemble performances; we score it 81. We recommend it for those prepared for a harrowing drama in which caring for others matters as much as physical endurance, though the repetitive middle makes its 143 minutes feel long.
How long is Society of the Snow, and what is it rated?
Society of the Snow runs 2h 23m. It is a drama and history film.
Where can I watch Society of the Snow in Chile?
Society of the Snow is streaming on Netflix in Chile. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Society of the Snow, and is it suitable for children?
Society of the Snow has a UK 15 certificate and is unsuitable for children, with a violent, claustrophobic plane crash and sustained scenes of suffering. We found the crash horrifying because the photography keeps us close to vulnerable people with nowhere to escape; older teenagers and adults sensitive to confinement or physical distress should approach it with care.
How does Society of the Snow compare to Touching the Void?
Society of the Snow offers a more expansive account of shared survival, while Touching the Void concentrates on climbers’ decisions and exhaustion through their accounts and convincing reconstructions. We favour Touching the Void for sustained suspense, despite its leisurely opening; Society of the Snow is the stronger choice for those drawn to relationships and mutual care, though its middle repeats itself.
What should I watch after Society of the Snow?
After Society of the Snow, try Touching the Void (2003, Fi1m 87): Mountain survival stripped down to decisions, exhaustion and the will to continue. Then The Ascent (1977, Fi1m 88): A harsher snowbound ordeal, with faith and responsibility pressing on every choice; and The Rescue (2021, Fi1m 78): Collective ingenuity and nerve, with the practical work of survival kept visible.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2024

Nominated
Best International Feature Film

Goya Award for Best Film, 2024

Won
Goya Award for Best Film

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 2024

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Flight of the Phoenix (1965) · not reviewed yetAnother stranded group discovers that cooperation can be harder than the engineering.

  2. Touching the Void (2003, Fi1m 87)Mountain survival stripped down to decisions, exhaustion and the will to continue.

  3. The Ascent (1977, Fi1m 88)A harsher snowbound ordeal, with faith and responsibility pressing on every choice.

  4. The Rescue (2021, Fi1m 78)Collective ingenuity and nerve, with the practical work of survival kept visible.

  5. Arctic (2018) · not reviewed yetFor the same punishing cold with fewer speeches and a smaller cast.