Four boys in winter coats standing with a girl on snowy ground
Film review

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut

1999 · Directed by Trey Parker · 1h 21m · ACB MA 15+

In a sentenceThe songs are good enough to sing in public, which would be a serious mistake

Stan Marsh, Eric Cartman, Kyle Broflovski and Kenny McCormick are at the centre of an animated comedy about bad language, censorship and parental control. Trey Parker voices Stan and Cartman, while Matt Stone voices Kyle and Kenny. Mary Kay Bergman provides the voices of Sheila Broflovski, Liane Cartman and Wendy Testaburger, with Isaac Hayes as Chef. Musical numbers accompany a story that draws parents, politicians and the media into questions of what children should hear and see. Arguments about obscenity become bound up with hostility towards other countries and the search for someone to blame for society’s problems.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Trey Parker’s animated musical makes sharp comedy from censorship and parental panic, with songs that earn their place. Some jokes keep going after the laughter stops, but we recommend its bad manners with that reservation.

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut is a sharp, funny musical with a few jokes that outstay their welcome. Trey Parker directs it with a useful understanding of how absurd adults become when they appoint themselves guardians of everybody else’s children. Censorship, parental control and political opportunism give the swearing something to do beyond testing how much of it a film can contain. We recommend it warmly, though anybody who finds the first barrage tiresome is unlikely to develop a taste for the next.

Parker, Matt Stone and Pam Brady’s script is strongest on the convenience of blaming entertainment for social failings. The adults’ concern with what children hear becomes a way of avoiding harder questions about their own behaviour. There is a proper satirical target here: the ease with which censorship can pass for responsible parenting, and hostility towards another country can pass for public service. The jokes about ratings hypocrisy land because the supposed protectors are so pleased with themselves.

Marc Shaiman’s music gives the film much of its shape and several tunes worth hearing twice. The songs borrow the earnest delivery and full-throated confidence of respectable musicals, and the obscenity sounds funnier for being sung with such care. We laughed hardest at the inspirational-ballad parodies, because the solemn musical treatment makes the filth seem even more preposterous. The tunes are worth hearing in their own right, which stops the musical jokes from depending entirely on recognition.

The voices keep the quarrelling lively. Parker’s Eric Cartman is funny in his petulance, with no effort wasted on making him lovable, while Stone’s Kyle Broflovski gives the exchanges a less abrasive rhythm. Mary Kay Bergman, voicing Sheila Broflovski, Liane Cartman and Wendy Testaburger, does particularly valuable work across the children and adults: the shifts in authority are audible without needing explanation. Isaac Hayes’s Chef offers a welcome change of vocal pace amid all the competitive indignation.

The simple animation also helps the comedy. Elaborate visual detail would be a distraction from the faces, the voices and the increasingly foolish things being said; the blunt figures suit the blunt language. Editor John Venzon keeps most exchanges moving quickly enough that the insults need little preparation or tidying up afterwards. At 81 minutes, the film generally understands how long this kind of attack can remain funny, even if it occasionally ignores its own good sense.

The reservation is repetition. Some subplots continue after their comic purpose is clear, and Parker’s willingness to keep pressing a joke can turn insolence into routine. By then, extra swearing does little to rescue the weaker material, especially once the initial pleasure of hearing the forbidden word has worn off. The pace slackens enough to make the waste noticeable in so short a running time.

As a musical comedy, it clears the important hurdle of making the tunes enjoyable before asking us to laugh at them. Parker’s affection for the form comes through in the earnest delivery, even when the words are doing their utmost to spoil it. That gives the film a pleasure beyond agreeing with its attacks on adult hypocrisy. Choose it for the songs, and be prepared to sit through a few insults that needed another draft.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
12
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and the praise clusters in two places: the satire and the songs. The reviews agree the targets are well chosen, chiefly the ratings board, censorship hysteria and the habit of blaming films and television for what parents fail to do, and that the swearing has a point. Nearly every critic singles out the musical numbers, which parody Broadway and Disney, and several note that the feature is more tightly built than the television episodes.

The reservations are about stamina. Several critics, among them The Guardian, Time Out and Empire, find the film sharpest in its first hour and stretched after that, with subplots that run on. The spread is narrow, most scores sitting between the seventies and nineties; the one mixed review comes from Roger Ebert, who grants the laughs but finds the film both offensive and out of steam by the end.

Sight and Sound
· Leslie Felperin
90*

The critic praises the film's timely satire of US censorship hysteria, politicians, media and xenophobia, noting its taut structure compared to the TV series. They single out the musical numbers and overall comedic execution as a high point.

Read the full review →
The Independent
6 July 1999
90*

The critic hails the film as a radical, insolent and breathtakingly offensive speedboat of a movie that mocks the R rating system and questions what constitutes a 'kid' film. They single out its satirical handling of profanity, adult hypocrisy and the US-Canada 'war' plot as making it the most truly radical American movie in years.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
30 June 1999 · Stephen Holden
90*

The review calls the film very funny and extremely obscene, praising its anti-Disney musical numbers that skewer everything from Rodgers and Hammerstein to inspirational ballads while making a pointed statement about ratings hypocrisy.

Read the full review →
The Times
26 October 2002 · Stephen Dalton
90*

The critic calls the film an inspired Oscar-nominated version that pushes Parker and Stone's talents to sublime new heights. They single out its scabrously funny mockery of puritanical pundits who equate vulgar language with immorality, recommending it highly to fans and non-converts alike.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
70*

The critic finds the film surprisingly agreeable and fun in its feature-length form, praising its choice comic moments, satirical sideswipes at censorship and parental control, and perky musical numbers. However, it suffers from hit-and-miss quality with some subplots dragged out too long.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
30 June 1999 · John Anderson
70*

The critic describes the film as gleefully vulgar and eagerly offensive yet smart and timely in its satire of intolerance, the ratings system and cultural sanctimony. He singles out the torrent of vulgarity and the V-chip subplot for their pointed humor.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut worth watching?
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut is worth watching for anyone who can enjoy a barrage of swearing sung with real musical care, and we scored it 80. Marc Shaiman's songs and the satire of censorship and parental panic carry it. Some jokes keep going after the laughter stops, and anyone tired by the first ten minutes will not warm to the rest.
How long is South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, and what is it rated?
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut runs 1h 21m and is rated MA 15+ by the ACB in Australia. It is an animation and comedy film.
Where can I watch South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut in Australia?
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut is streaming on HBO Max, Amazon Prime Video and Paramount+ in Australia, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from A$4.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, and is it suitable for children?
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut carries a UK 15 certificate and a US R, and is not suitable for children. The film is built on constant obscene language, crude sexual humour and the mockery of the adults trying to police it, all delivered in simple cartoon form. It is not frightening, but the squeamish and anyone offended by relentless bad language should stay away.
How does South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut compare to Duck Soup?
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut and Duck Soup both use songs and official stupidity to mock patriotism and political vanity, but Duck Soup is the tighter and better film. Leo McCarey's timing rarely slackens, while Trey Parker presses some jokes past their comic purpose. Choose Duck Soup for wit that has kept its edge, and South Park for filth sung as if it were Rodgers and Hammerstein.
What should I watch after South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut?
After South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, try Duck Soup (1933, Fi1m 88): For more official stupidity, brisk songs and patriotism used as an excuse. Then Four Lions (2010, Fi1m 94): Another comedy that lets appalling behaviour coexist with recognisably human foolishness; and The Triplets of Belleville (2003, Fi1m 84): For animation whose musical wit makes polite conversation almost entirely unnecessary.

Cast

Awards

Annie Award for Best Animated Feature, 1999

Nominated
Annie Award for Best Animated Feature

If you liked this, try…

  1. Team America: World Police (2004) · not reviewed yetAnother vulgar musical that gives political certainty a deservedly difficult evening.

  2. Duck Soup (1933, Fi1m 88)For more official stupidity, brisk songs and patriotism used as an excuse.

  3. The Happiness of the Katakuris (2001) · not reviewed yetA family crisis becomes a musical, with remarkably little concern for good taste.

  4. Four Lions (2010, Fi1m 94)Another comedy that lets appalling behaviour coexist with recognisably human foolishness.

  5. The Triplets of Belleville (2003, Fi1m 84)For animation whose musical wit makes polite conversation almost entirely unnecessary.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever