Film review

Four Lions

2010 · Directed by Chris Morris · 1h 37m · MPA R

In a sentenceA terrorist cell we would hesitate to trust with a school trip

ComedyCrimeDrama

Omar (Riz Ahmed) is among a group of British men planning suicide bombings. Alongside him are Barry (Nigel Lindsay), Waj (Kayvan Novak), Faisal (Adeel Akhtar) and Hassan (Arsher Ali), whose preparations are complicated by disagreement, confusion and incompetence. They want to carry out an attack, but struggle to agree on how to proceed. Away from the group’s planning, Omar has a happy family life. As the men argue and attempt to organise themselves, their dealings with one another bring personal loyalties and pressure to conform into their preparations for violence.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Chris Morris makes a painfully funny comedy about men whose incompetence does not make them harmless. Riz Ahmed and Nigel Lindsay keep it unsettling, though the middle repeats jokes that have already done their work.

Chris Morris asks us to spend Four Lions in the company of aspiring suicide bombers and to laugh at them before we have worked out how we feel about that. It is a sharp, often painfully funny film, worth seeing even though its middle stretch starts repeating itself. The men are British, their plans murderous, and their capacity to agree on anything limited. Morris finds comedy in the business of getting them to cooperate, without suggesting that incompetence makes them safe.

Morris and fellow writers Simon Blackwell, Sam Bain and Jesse Armstrong give these men the familiar failings of people who spend too much time together. They bicker, misunderstand and submit to pressure from one another, turning preparations for an attack into a succession of petty disputes. The jokes depend on who gives way, who insists and who is prepared to follow. That gives even the broader exchanges a recognisable cause: the men want approval from each other, and their need to belong makes them susceptible to some terrible ideas.

Riz Ahmed’s Omar gives the film someone capable of recognising stupidity without being free of it himself. Ahmed resists making him merely the sensible man waiting for the others to catch up. We were unsettled by the ease of Omar’s happy family life: the domestic contentment does nothing to interrupt his preparations for violence. Nigel Lindsay’s Barry supplies a harsher comic energy, with the belligerence of someone who regards any disagreement as a personal insult.

Lol Crawley’s cinematography keeps us close to the men’s confusion, using a loose, observational style that suits the bickering. It is an effective choice for people who already take their own importance far too seriously. Dick Lunn’s production design is similarly unshowy around Omar’s family, making the domestic life credible without distracting from the people. Those surroundings deny us the easy reassurance that someone planning an atrocity must look different from everyone else.

Billy Sneddon’s editing gives the bickering room to become funny, so that we can follow how one misunderstanding leads to another. Jonathan Whitehead’s music sensibly takes second place to those voices, which do most of the comic work. There is no need to underline every absurdity when the cast can sound so convinced. The trouble comes when another round of confusion tells us little that the previous one did.

At 97 minutes, the film is not long, but it has an episodic middle that feels longer than it should. Morris and the writers sometimes accept another demonstration of foolishness where we need a change in the relationships. This is also where the satire risks becoming comfortable: it is easy to feel clever while watching people get things wrong. A few broader passages ask less of us than the uneasy affection established elsewhere.

Yet by the standards of political farce, Four Lions is unusually willing to let its ridiculous people become people we care about. Morris does not need to redeem them to make that care disquieting, and Ahmed in particular prevents the film settling into simple mockery. The violence they contemplate remains a choice, however foolishly they discuss it. Choose company willing to laugh and then argue about what they have laughed at.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

74
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Four Lions as a daring, frequently funny black comedy that makes its would-be terrorists recognisably human without softening their intentions. Praise centres on the characters’ bickering, muddled thinking and personal loyalties, with the laughs coming from the distance between their ambitions and their competence. The reviews also value the performances, verbal comedy and uneasy feeling that accompanies the farce. For many, the affection these men inspire makes the threat of violence more disturbing.

The disagreement is chiefly about how much the satire achieves beyond exposing stupidity. Some otherwise favourable reviews find the film episodic or detect a lull, while harsher assessments see broad slapstick replacing sharper thought. The Independent finds the jokes unconvincing and largely unfunny despite strong performances, especially Riz Ahmed’s. The New Yorker admires the satirical energy but argues that the straightforward storytelling lets viewers feel too comfortably superior to the characters.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012
85*

The critic lauds the film as a bold, hilarious farce that humanizes its absurd characters through sharp satire and effective storytelling, arguing it successfully uses humor to expose the stupidity of extremism while evoking genuine emotion.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 November 2010 · B+ · Nathan Rabin
83

The critic praises the corrosive black comedy for humanizing its hapless would-be jihadists while delivering audacious, dangerous laughs from the gap between their delusions and reality.

Read the full review →
Empire
3 May 2009 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic praises the film's consistent humor and sharp satire on inept jihadists while acknowledging its potential to offend; it highlights the strong central bond between the lead characters and the comedy arising from their personal dynamics rather than broad barbs.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Adam Smith
80

The audacious jihad comedy is very funny and occasionally emulates the faux quaintness of Ealing comedies. The suicide bombers are portrayed as a mostly likeable bunch despite their grim intentions.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
10 November 2010 · Roger Ebert
80*

The film is a transgressive dark comedy and wicked satire about incompetent would-be jihadists whose amateurish schemes highlight self-defeating idiocy. It regards imbecility with a poker face and permits horrifying acts to occur absentmindedly, fueled by both merriment and anger.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 June 2010 · Ben Walters
80*

The critic highlights how the film presents homegrown jihadists as buffoons driven by woolly thinking and peer pressure, with their incompetence yielding very funny jokes. Tragedy lurks beneath the farce, rendering fundamentalism sympathetically pathetic.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Dr. Strangelove poster93

Dr. Strangelove

1964 · For another comedy in which confident fools have access to terrible weapons

The Firemen's Ball poster

The Firemen's Ball

1967 · A smaller gathering of bunglers, with equally precise attention to collective stupidity

Paradise Now poster

Paradise Now

2005 · A sober drama about aspiring suicide bombers and the people around them

Wild Tales poster83

Wild Tales

2014 · More black comedy about people whose grievances become everybody else’s problem

The Death of Stalin poster

The Death of Stalin

2017 · Petty rivalries and lethal consequences, with another ensemble skilled at sounding certain