Film review

Swiss Army Man

2016 · Directed by Dan Kwan, Daniel Scheinert · 1h 37m · MPA R

In a sentenceDaniel Radcliffe makes dragging a corpse through the wilderness seem almost sociable

ComedyDramaRomanceFantasy

Shipwrecked and stranded in the wilderness, Hank (Paul Dano) needs to find a way to survive. His company is Manny (Daniel Radcliffe), a dead man whose flatulence turns out to be useful. Hank drags the corpse through the wild and begins using its bodily functions as survival equipment. Having another body to hand gives him practical help, but it also brings companionship to a situation defined by isolation. The journey depends on what Manny’s body can do and what Hank can make of it. Mary Elizabeth Winstead also appears as Sarah.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Swiss Army Man is a funny, oddly tender survival comedy, carried by Paul Dano and Daniel Radcliffe. The earnest conversations can drag, but the affection between its stranded man and useful corpse is worth staying for.

Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert take a joke about a flatulent corpse seriously enough to build a friendship around it. Swiss Army Man is funny and touching, with a tiresome habit of explaining feelings that its actors have already made clear. As writers and directors, they seem determined to find something worth loving in everything most people would rather conceal about having a body. That gives the comedy a purpose, although there are stretches when we would happily settle for another practical use for the corpse.

Hank, played by Paul Dano, needs to survive in the wilderness; Manny, played by Daniel Radcliffe, supplies an assortment of bodily functions that prove unexpectedly useful. The indignity of treating a dead man as outdoor equipment is enough to sustain the first joke, and the actors make it possible to care about the arrangement. We laughed at Hank’s dependence on this absurd body, then felt unexpectedly protective of the pair. Their companionship gives the physical comedy a tenderness that the premise cannot prepare us for.

Daniel Radcliffe has the harder physical assignment, making a corpse expressive without losing the awkwardness that makes it funny. He gives Manny enough vulnerability for the jokes at the body’s expense to feel faintly uncomfortable, and enough comic precision to keep them enjoyable. Paul Dano supplies the more recognisable distress, allowing Hank’s loneliness to be unattractive as well as pitiable. Neither actor stands outside the film to reassure us that he knows how peculiar it is.

Larkin Seiple’s photography finds enough visual interest in a man hauling a corpse through the wild to keep that image from wearing out its welcome. The body’s awkward presence is funny before anyone supplies another line of dialogue. Jason Kisvarday’s production design gives the film a hand-made look that suits Hank’s need to improvise with what is available. That roughness helps the fantasy feel personal, even when the bodily tricks become elaborate.

Matthew Hannam’s editing has a less forgiving task, since a succession of discoveries about Manny must also sustain a feature-length journey. The film drags when it pauses to discuss what bodies, embarrassment and human connection mean, and another inventive sequence cannot quite hide the repetition. Andy Hull and Robert McDowell’s music adds warmth, though its folk sweetness sometimes urges a tender response before the scene has earned one. We do not need every strange encounter softened for us, especially when the performances have already made these men sympathetic.

Buddy comedies need their odd couples to seem worth the trouble, and this one makes its most unpromising character surprisingly easy to love. The friendship is engaging enough to justify a few uneasy shifts between the ridiculous and the sorrowful. At 97 minutes, the film still has passages that could lose a little talking. See it if physical comedy and open-hearted fantasy sound like reasonable companions, and allow for some lecturing along the way.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
15
Mixed
6
Negative
5

Most critics respond warmly to Swiss Army Man, though the reviews are sharply divided over its mixture of bodily-function comedy and loneliness. Praise centres on Daniel Radcliffe’s physical performance as a multi-purpose corpse, with Paul Dano’s commitment and the pair’s chemistry also drawing approval. Supporters find the friendship unexpectedly moving and the images inventive, arguing that the film’s absurdity gives it a direct way to discuss embarrassment, mortality and human connection.

The disagreement is over how much feeling and thought the fart jokes can sustain. Some otherwise favourable reviews flag slack pacing or an unsatisfying finale; less persuaded critics find the sincerity forced and the characters thin. The Guardian rejects the combination of juvenile humour and philosophical ambition, while The New Yorker also disputes the praise for the images and performances. The spread is wide: what moves admirers strikes detractors as cloying.

Empire
26 September 2016 · Chris Hewitt
90*

The critic describes it as a gloriously inventive fable about humanity that is hilarious, moving and profound, calling it one of the year’s best films. They single out the originality of the images and Radcliffe’s astonishing performance as Manny for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 June 2016 · Critic's Pick · Jeannette Catsoulis
90*

The film is a weird and wonderful, disgusting and demented buddy movie in which one man’s dead body nudges another back to life. It is an impossible-to-categorize, stunningly original mix of the macabre and the magical that creates an atmosphere of effluvial enchantment through acting, music, photography and effects.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 June 2016 · ★★★½/4 · Christopher Gray
88

The film dares viewers to embrace its singular earnestness as a buddy comedy and love story about bodies, language, and connection in the smartphone era. It achieves a visionary achievement in vitality and transparency from its hero but ends with a disappointing, elusive finale.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
30 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Matthew Turner
80

The critic calls it a surprisingly moving and very funny black comedy that blends the profound and the puerile. They single out the inventive direction and Radcliffe’s committed, outstanding performance as Manny for praise.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
29 September 2016 · ★★★★
80

The film poses a critical quandary due to its bizarre premise but the critic recommends it, praising the singular gonzo indie spirit and the energetic performances from both leads.

Read the full review →
Total Film
29 January 2016 · festival review
80*

The critic finds the film sweeter and more sensitive than its premise suggests, with absurd laughs that give way to something deeper and more personal. They single out the emerging friendship between the leads and the emotional payoff for praise.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Sitges Film Festival Best Feature-Length Film award, 2016

Won
Sitges Film Festival Best Feature-Length Film award

Sundance U.S. Directing Award: Dramatic, 2016

Won
Sundance U.S. Directing Award: Dramatic

If you liked this, try…

Harold and Maude poster81

Harold and Maude

1971 · Another unlikely friendship makes room for death, bad manners and tenderness.

Castaway on the Moon poster

Castaway on the Moon

2009 · Stranded lives and improvised survival become an awkward route towards connection.

A Matter of Life and Death poster92

A Matter of Life and Death

1946 · An elaborate fantasy treats love and mortality with wit and feeling.

After Life poster

After Life

1998 · A quieter fantasy about death, built around ordinary memories and human company.

The Lobster poster78

The Lobster

2015 · A colder, crueller comedy about the strange rules governing human companionship.