Film review

The King of Comedy

1982 · Directed by Martin Scorsese · 1h 49m · MPA PG

In a sentenceRobert De Niro keeps smiling long after everyone else has found a reason to stop

DramaComedy

Rupert Pupkin (Robert De Niro) wants to become a stand-up comedian and sees television host Jerry Langford (Jerry Lewis) as his route to an audience. He imagines a friendship with Jerry that bears little resemblance to their actual acquaintance, treating setbacks as reasons to persist. Rita (Diahnne Abbott) and Masha (Sandra Bernhard) also figure in Rupert’s pursuit of recognition. Martin Scorsese directs from Paul D. Zimmerman’s screenplay, moving between Rupert’s fantasies and his encounters with people who do not share them. His wish to be noticed leaves increasingly little room for anyone else’s wishes.

Fi1m review

Robert De Niro and Jerry Lewis make Martin Scorsese’s sour comedy about unwanted attention painfully funny. We recommend it, though the repeated humiliations can make its 109 minutes feel rather longer.

Martin Scorsese’s The King of Comedy is a painfully funny film, and we recommend it to anyone prepared to spend an evening feeling embarrassed for a stranger. Robert De Niro plays Rupert Pupkin, an aspiring comedian who wants television host Jerry Langford to give him his chance. Rupert has already imagined the welcome; other people keep getting their responses wrong. Scorsese stays close enough to this man for his optimism to become oppressive. There is no need to like him, but a tolerance for prolonged social discomfort helps.

De Niro makes Rupert’s confidence unsettling because it seems impervious to information. His smile keeps soliciting a response long after the eagerness has stopped being endearing, and he gives even his apparent friendliness an uncomfortable insistence. The fantasy sequences let his expectations expand without making Rupert easier to dismiss as a harmless eccentric. We can recognise the ordinary wish for approval inside the delusion, which makes the performance harder to laugh off and gives his persistence an unpleasant familiarity.

Jerry Lewis gives Langford a fatigue that feels settled deep in his face. His dead-eyed response to Rupert is funny until it begins to look like a reasonable defence against someone who will not stop. We felt trapped watching Lewis’s expression fail to discourage De Niro’s eagerness. The discomfort comes from the actors’ unwillingness to meet each other halfway: Rupert keeps offering his imagined friendship, and Jerry has no interest in performing gratitude for it.

Fred Schuler’s cinematography is most effective in its attention to the actors’ faces. De Niro’s pleased expression gives us plenty to inspect, without any need for the image to insist that he is strange. Boris Leven’s production design makes the television surroundings seem like workplaces, which usefully limits their glamour. Rupert’s conviction that getting inside would transform his life looks less reasonable against that ordinariness, and the setting helps us understand why Jerry might have other things to do.

Thelma Schoonmaker’s editing makes an awkward exchange feel as though it has outlasted every possible polite escape. There is time to understand the embarrassment and then considerably more time to sit with it, a rhythm that allows both actors to become thoroughly uncomfortable company. Robbie Robertson’s music gives the comedy little sentimental cushioning, a useful decision when De Niro can already suggest the hurt beneath Rupert’s confidence. These choices work, although the sustained pressure eventually makes some passages feel repetitive.

Paul D. Zimmerman’s screenplay returns so often to Rupert’s inability to take a hint that some encounters add little to what we already know. The narrow emotional range sometimes becomes tiring, even when the writing remains sharp and the performances committed. Sandra Bernhard gives Masha enough exposed unhappiness to keep the film’s lonely people from seeming interchangeable. That repetition is the main reservation: Scorsese’s patience is not equally rewarding in every scene, and another demonstration of Rupert’s delusion is not always necessary.

As black comedy, the film is unusually willing to let recognition spoil a laugh. Its reluctance to offer relief will also frustrate anyone waiting for a more conventional thriller to get moving. Lewis makes that severity worthwhile: his refusal to indulge Rupert gives their exchanges a force that a more welcoming performance would lose. At 109 minutes, it can still feel like a long evening in difficult company. Save it for a night when neither person on the sofa needs cheering up.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Andrew Collins
100

It's an unsung masterpiece, with powerful complex performances from De Niro and Lewis, blending farce and tragedy in a strange Scorsese-De Niro collaboration.

Read the full review →
Time Out
6 January 2012 · PT
85*

The critic finds it the creepiest and one of the best movies of the year, praising its unsettling excesses and De Niro's performance as a delusional fantasist, while noting it's hilariously not a comedy.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
60*

The critic describes the film as an interesting misfire that sits awkwardly between black comedy and thriller, neither funny nor scary enough to fully succeed in either mode. They praise Scorsese's scene-making skills and single out Jerry Lewis's intense, dead-eyed performance as the standout element that nearly eclipses De Niro.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
15 May 1983 · Roger Ebert

Ebert finds the film an arid, painful portrait of lonely, angry people that frustratingly withholds emotional release or payoff. He praises the committed performances, especially by De Niro and Lewis, and sees it as a bold departure for Scorsese.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 February 1983 · Vincent Canby

Canby calls the film very funny and satisfying in its surprise ending, with an original screenplay that is witty even in its fantasy sequences. He highlights De Niro's complex, flamboyant performance as the standout element.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1982 · ** · Variety Staff

The review deems the film a royal disappointment despite De Niro's virtuoso performance, criticizing the unlikable characters who stand for nothing. It notes Bernhard as slightly more pathetic but faults the overall lack of substance.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

BAFTA Film Awards, 1984

Nominated
Best Actor in a Leading Role
Nominated
Best Actor in a Supporting Role
Nominated
Best Direction
Nominated
Best Editing
Won
Best Original Screenplay

London Film Critics Circle Award for Film of the Year, 1983

Won
London Film Critics Circle Award for Film of the Year

NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Actress in a Motion Picture, 1983

Nominated
NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Actress in a Motion Picture

National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Supporting Actress, 1983

Won
National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

A Face in the Crowd poster

A Face in the Crowd

1957 · Another sharp account of television fame, with charm that grows steadily less reassuring.

The Firemen's Ball poster

The Firemen's Ball

1967 · Public embarrassment spreads through a whole community, observed with merciless comic patience.

Network poster

Network

1976 · Television rewards bad behaviour again, with louder speeches and a broader institutional target.

The Forest for the Trees poster

The Forest for the Trees

2003 · Social neediness becomes almost unbearable in a quieter, more sympathetic study of loneliness.

Ingrid Goes West poster

Ingrid Goes West

2017 · A lonely admirer mistakes access for intimacy, with social media supplying fresh opportunities.