Chuck Krantz (Tom Hiddleston) stands before brightly lit theater signage
Film review

The Life of Chuck

2025 · Directed by Mike Flanagan · 1h 51m

In a sentenceThe end of the world, a stranger who can dance, and a narrator who will not stop explaining

Told in three chapters that run backwards, the film opens at the end of the world. In a small American town, Marty Anderson (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a schoolteacher, watches things fail one after another and goes on teaching anyway. His ex-wife Felicia Gordon (Karen Gillan), a nurse, rings him for the first time in months. Nobody panics. Every billboard and television screen carries the same smiling man in a suit and the same message, thanking a Charles Krantz for thirty-nine great years. Nobody Marty asks knows who Chuck is. The later chapters move back through Chuck’s own life: Tom Hiddleston as a man in a suit, and Benjamin Pajak as the boy he was, raised by his grandparents Albie (Mark Hamill) and Sarah Krantz (Mia Sara). Nick Offerman narrates.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Mike Flanagan’s Stephen King adaptation has a street-corner dance good enough to justify the ticket, and an end-of-the-world chapter nearly as good. Then it spends its last forty minutes telling us, in words, what it had already shown us.

Mike Flanagan has adapted Stephen King twice before, in Gerald’s Game (2017) and Doctor Sleep (2019), and both times he chose horror. This time he has chosen a story with no monster in it. The Life of Chuck is told backwards in three chapters, beginning with the end of the world and finishing with a boy learning to dance in his grandparents’ house. It is sincere to the point of discomfort, it has one sequence we would not have missed for anything, and it explains itself far more than it needs to.

The first chapter is the best, and the one nobody would expect from this material. Marty Anderson (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a schoolteacher, watches the world come apart a piece at a time. His ex-wife Felicia Gordon (Karen Gillan) works nights at the hospital and is surprised to find she still wants to talk to him. Nobody panics much; they go to work and come home. On every billboard a man in a suit smiles above a message thanking Charles Krantz for thirty-nine great years, and nobody knows who he is. Eben Bolter shoots it under failing streetlight and in rooms lit by whatever still works, and there is a walk home along a darkening road that gave us a proper chill. Andrew Grush and Taylor Stewart keep the score to a low hum here, and Ejiofor plays a man who has stopped expecting answers and is quietly relieved.

Then the chapter called Act Two, and the dance. Chuck (Tom Hiddleston), a man in a suit carrying a briefcase, walks past a busker drumming on a corner, sets the briefcase down and starts to move. Janice Halliday (Annalise Basso), who has just been dumped by text, gets pulled in. It runs for several minutes and Flanagan, who edits the film himself, mostly lets it run, holding wide enough that we can see the whole body and the crowd forming. Hiddleston dances like a man who took lessons as a child and has told nobody since, loose in the hips and pleased with himself, and Basso matches him. We grinned in the dark for the whole of it and were sorry when he picked the briefcase back up. It is the reason to see the film, and the reason most critics forgive what follows.

What follows is the longest chapter and the weakest. Chuck grows up with his grandparents, played as a boy by Benjamin Pajak and at other ages by Jacob Tremblay and Cody Flanagan. Albie Krantz (Mark Hamill) is his grandfather, Sarah Krantz (Mia Sara) his grandmother, and it is Sarah who dances in the kitchen and passes it on. Miss Rohrbacher (Samantha Sloyan) runs the school dance club where Chuck partners Cat McCoy (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss). Steve Arnold gives the family a tall wooden house with a cupola, the sort of place King has been writing about for fifty years, and Hamill is good in it, gruff and careful, with fear underneath. But the chapter goes on, and on, and each scene exists to account for something in the two before it.

The trouble is the narrator. Nick Offerman reads long stretches of prose over the picture, telling us what Marty is thinking, what Chuck decides, what the grandfather’s silence means. The actors are already showing us. Every time the film comes near something we might have worked out for ourselves, Offerman arrives to make sure we do not have to. The idea on the poster, that every life is a universe all its own, is spoken, then paraphrased, then illustrated. Once would have done. By the last half hour the mystery of the billboards has been answered in full, and we felt the film taking something back from us that we had been glad to hold.

Flanagan is the most sympathetic reader King has had on screen in years, and he can hold a large sad idea steady; Doctor Sleep did it for two and a half hours. Here he has 111 minutes and one idea, that an ordinary life is the size of a universe, and he does not trust us with it. Because the film runs backwards, its high point arrives at the halfway mark, and everything after is explanation.

See it for the first chapter and for the dance, and go in knowing the film will then explain both. Bring someone who cries easily; they will have a better night than you will. It carries a 15 and opened in British cinemas on 22 August 2025.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
11
Mixed
7
Negative
6

Most critics find The Life of Chuck warm and sincere, and most of them have a reservation about it. The reviews lean positive, and the praise gathers in two places: Tom Hiddleston, whose relaxed, melancholy performance as Chuck is admired even by those who dislike the film, and the street-corner dance sequence, which nearly every critic names as the moment where the film shares its joy with the audience. Several also single out the opening chapter, with its end-of-days melancholy, as the most interesting stretch.

The reservations cluster on sentiment. A sizeable group finds the film saccharine, its life lessons simplistic and its speeches heavy-handed, and many say the reverse-chronological structure loses force as it goes, with the childhood section named the weakest act. The spread is wide: Den of Geek gives it full marks, while The Guardian finds it stilted and unmoving and The New Yorker says its engineered storytelling stifles the feeling it reaches for.

Vulture
6 June 2025 · Bilge Ebiri
90*

Ebiri finds the film deeply moving and unexpectedly twisty, praising its emotional portrayal of endurance and the value of living fully. He particularly singles out the marvelous street-corner dance sequence as a moment of fleeting beauty.

Read the full review →
Empire
20 August 2025 · Dan Jolin
75*

Jolin finds the film divisive but moving, praising its brazen sincerity and life-affirming embrace of joy. He singles out the final chapter as tonally less clear and less rousing than the preceding sections.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
21 August 2025 · BFI
75*

The critic finds the film a hopeful, emotionally resonant adaptation and sees Flanagan as an especially sympathetic interpreter of Stephen King. They single out Tom Hiddleston’s sustained dance sequence as a joyous highlight, while noting that the supernatural ending may frustrate some viewers.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
6 June 2025 · B- · Katie Rife
70

Rife finds the film warmly earnest and potentially too saccharine, though its sentimentality may charm viewers. She praises its central idea that every ordinary life contains a universe of memories and connections.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
18 August 2025 · Kevin Harley
70*

The review presents the film as an entertaining crowd-pleaser, though its sentimentality sometimes outweighs its substance. The critic singles out its imaginative, affirmative approach while noting that schmaltz can overwhelm it.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The URL identifies this as RogerEbert.com’s review, but the page content is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint from the critic is visible.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Life of Chuck worth watching?
The Life of Chuck is worth watching for the first chapter and for Tom Hiddleston's street-corner dance, and we scored it 63. Mike Flanagan's Stephen King adaptation is sincere and well made, but its last forty minutes explain, in narration, what the actors have already shown. Go in for the two good hours it half contains, and bring someone who cries easily.
How long is The Life of Chuck, and what is it rated?
The Life of Chuck runs 1h 51m. It is a fantasy and drama film.
Where can I watch The Life of Chuck in Colombia?
The Life of Chuck is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in Colombia, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from CO$12900.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Life of Chuck, and is it suitable for children?
The Life of Chuck carries a UK 15 certificate and is a drama rather than a horror film, with no monster in it. The first chapter shows the world ending quietly, and one walk home along a darkening road gave us a proper chill, but nothing the review notes as gory or violent. It is not made for younger children; older teenagers should be fine.
How does The Life of Chuck compare to Ikiru?
The Life of Chuck and Ikiru both hold that an ordinary life matters, and both keep explaining what they have already shown. Kurosawa's film is the better one: Takashi Shimura's dying clerk makes wasted time painfully ordinary, where Flanagan's film peaks at its dance and then narrates itself home. Choose Ikiru for the deeper evening, The Life of Chuck for the warmer and easier one.
What should I watch after The Life of Chuck?
After The Life of Chuck, try Ikiru (1952, Fi1m 92): Kurosawa’s clerk learns he is dying and finally does one thing that matters. Then Melancholia (2011, Fi1m 80): The end of the world arrives during a wedding, and everyone keeps setting the table; and Synecdoche, New York (2008, Fi1m 84): A whole life staged inside a warehouse; sadder, stranger and less tidy than Chuck.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Ikiru (1952, Fi1m 92)Kurosawa’s clerk learns he is dying and finally does one thing that matters.

  2. Melancholia (2011, Fi1m 80)The end of the world arrives during a wedding, and everyone keeps setting the table.

  3. Synecdoche, New York (2008, Fi1m 84)A whole life staged inside a warehouse; sadder, stranger and less tidy than Chuck.

  4. Perfect Days (2023, Fi1m 83)Wenders watches a Tokyo toilet cleaner and finds a universe without a narrator.

  5. Stand by Me (1986, Fi1m 88)King without monsters, done first and done better: four boys, a summer, a railway line.