A younger man in a striped shirt holds an older man close as he looks anxiously aside
Film review

Walter

1982 · Directed by Stephen Frears · 1h 10m

In a sentenceA new television channel opened its doors with this, and then presumably put the kettle on and had a quiet cry

Walter (Ian McKellen) is a grown man with learning disabilities who still lives with his parents in a small house in an English town. His mother Sarah (Barbara Jefford) washes him, feeds him and prays over him, and has decided that God will look after him when she cannot. His father (Arthur Whybrow) says little and is not well. Walter works in the stockroom of a shop, answerable to Mr Hingley (Tony Melody), where Mike (Keith Allen) and Jean (Lesley Clare O’Neill) find him funny and then find him in the way. At home he keeps pigeons in the attic, the one thing that belongs to him. What Walter wants is for nothing to change. What stands in the way is that his parents are old, and nobody has made a plan for what happens to him when they are gone.

Fi1m review

Stephen Frears’s 70-minute film is plain, hard to sit through and worth it. Ian McKellen plays a man nobody has planned for, and the film follows him into the one place that was always going to take him.

On the evening of 2 November 1982 a new British television channel showed, as the first thing it had ever made, a film about a man with learning disabilities whose parents die and leave him to the state. It was a declaration of some kind, and Walter still feels like one. Stephen Frears directs a script by David Cook, from Cook’s own novel, and keeps it to 70 minutes. We recommend it, with the caveat that it is one of the bleakest hours British television has produced and it does not soften at the end.

Ian McKellen is the whole film and knows it. He plays Walter with his jaw slack, his eyes mostly on the floor, his hands never quite sure where they should be. He says his few words twice, as if checking they came out. There is no music in the performance, no moment where the actor steps out and asks for our sympathy, and that is why it works. When Walter is happy, usually with a bird in his hands, McKellen lets a small, closed pleasure cross his face and then shuts it away again before anyone can take it off him. It is a careful, physical piece of work and it never asks to be admired.

Barbara Jefford’s Sarah loves her son and has confused that love with God’s. She talks to him in the voice of a woman explaining things to a wall she is fond of. Arthur Whybrow, as the father, has almost no lines and spends them wisely; he watches his wife and his son and seems to know what is coming. Chris Menges shoots the house with the light that comes through the net curtains and no more, so the rooms are brown and the faces grey, and the only colour is the pigeons. He stays close to McKellen’s face and lets the rest of the frame go soft, which puts us where Walter is: able to see one thing at a time.

The stockroom scenes are the film’s warmest and they are not warm. Keith Allen’s Mike treats Walter as a running joke and Lesley Clare O’Neill’s Jean laughs along until she doesn’t. Tony Melody’s Mr Hingley tolerates him the way a manager tolerates a filing cabinet that sometimes falls over. Cook writes these people without malice, which is the point: nobody here is cruel on purpose, and nobody is going to help either.

Then the parents are gone and Walter is taken away, and the film becomes something else. We will not describe what Walter does, or what is found, when his mother dies; it is the image people remember and it should be met cold. What follows is a ward. Jim Broadbent’s Joseph and Kenny Ireland’s Angus are the orderlies, and they are not monsters; they are tired, underpaid and in charge of too many men. We were horrified in that ward, and not by anything that was done to Walter. It was the noise, the men rocking and shouting under strip lights, the sense that this room had been going on for years before the camera arrived and would go on after it left. Menges shoots it wide and flat, and George Fenton’s score stays out, and we found ourselves wanting the film to be shorter than 70 minutes.

The flaws are the flaws of its kind. Walter has an inner life only when he has a bird; the rest of the time he is what happens to him, and a 70-minute film has no room to find out whether there was more. Sarah’s religion is a single note, struck often. The ward edges toward the grotesque in a couple of shots, and the film would have been harder to argue with without them. And the question of an actor without a learning disability playing a man with one is a question the film does not know it is raising; viewers now will raise it, and they will be right to.

Frears would go on to My Beautiful Laundrette (1985) and The Queen (2006), films that look nothing like this one, and the thing they share is here already: a director who trusts his actors and does not get in their way. Walter is a small, hard, decent film. Watch it when you are not tired, with someone who will not want to talk straight afterwards.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
2
Negative
0
The New York Times
25 February 1988
64*

The New York Times URL identifies this as a television review of Walter. The review text is inaccessible, so its verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· JPy
64*

The accessible page gives no critic verdict. Its metadata describes a short feature about a young man institutionalised after his parents' deaths.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Walter worth watching?
Walter is worth watching for anyone prepared for one of the bleakest hours British television has produced, and we scored it 78. Ian McKellen's careful, physical performance as a man with learning disabilities carries the whole 70 minutes, and the film does not soften at the end. Watch it when you are not tired.
How long is Walter, and what is it rated?
Walter runs 1h 10m. It is a drama film.
Where can I watch Walter in South Korea?
Walter is not on any streaming or rental service in South Korea at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Walter, and is it suitable for children?
Walter carries a 15 certificate in the UK and is not suitable for children, less for violence than for its unrelenting bleakness. There is no music or cruelty for its own sake, but the ward scenes, with men rocking and shouting under strip lights, horrified us, and one image after the mother's death is meant to be met cold. Teenagers should be warned what they are in for.
How does Walter compare to Umberto D.?
Walter and Umberto D. are both about a man society has no further use for, and both put their force in a single central presence. De Sica's film is the warmer and more absorbing, and its music sometimes asks for feelings already earned; Frears's is plainer, shorter and harder to sit through, with George Fenton's score kept out. Start with Umberto D. if you want to be moved; choose Walter if you can take being horrified.
What should I watch after Walter?
After Walter, try Umberto D. (1952, Fi1m 91): De Sica’s old man, his dog and a city that has no further use for him. Then Kes (1969, Fi1m 88): A boy, a bird and the one thing in his life that is his; Menges shot it; and The Elephant Man (1980, Fi1m 84): Lynch’s account of a man exhibited and then pitied, in black and white.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Family Life (1971) · not reviewed yetKen Loach on a young woman and the psychiatry that fails her; just as unsparing.

  2. Titicut Follies (1967) · not reviewed yetFrederick Wiseman’s documentary from inside a Massachusetts asylum; the ward without the actors.

  3. Umberto D. (1952, Fi1m 91)De Sica’s old man, his dog and a city that has no further use for him.

  4. Kes (1969, Fi1m 88)A boy, a bird and the one thing in his life that is his; Menges shot it.

  5. The Elephant Man (1980, Fi1m 84)Lynch’s account of a man exhibited and then pitied, in black and white.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever