Maddie Schwartz (Natalie Portman) and Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram) face each other in the water
Series review

Lady in the Lake

2024 · Created by Alma Har'el · Series · LSF D

In a sentenceA dead woman tells her own story and a living one keeps talking over her

Baltimore, Thanksgiving 1966. Maddie Schwartz (Natalie Portman), a housewife in the suburbs, walks out on her husband Milton (Brett Gelman) and teenage son Seth (Noah Jupe) after a young girl vanishes from the holiday parade, and takes a flat in a Black neighbourhood downtown. She wants the girl found and, more than that, wants a byline at the city paper, where the reporter Bob Bauer (Pruitt Taylor Vince) has no use for her. Across town Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram) keeps the books for the numbers boss Shell Gordon (Wood Harris), models dresses in a department-store window and goes home to two sons and a comedian husband, Slappy (Byron Bowers), who cannot hold a booking. Cleo narrates from the first minutes, and tells us at once that she is already dead. A policeman, Ferdie (Y’lan Noel), walks the streets between the two women.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Alma Har’el’s seven-part Baltimore mystery looks better than almost anything on television and cannot leave a scene alone. Moses Ingram is the reason to keep going; the dream sequences, the voiceover and the constant underlining are the reasons you may not.

Alma Har’el created, wrote and directed all seven episodes of Lady in the Lake, and shares the editing credit with Yael Hersonski and Dominic LaPerriere, so everything on screen is how she wanted it. What she wanted is a Baltimore of 1966 in which two women who barely meet are joined by a murder: Maddie Schwartz (Natalie Portman), a Jewish housewife who leaves her marriage to chase a story, and Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram), who is dead before the first episode has finished telling us her name. It is adapted from Laura Lippman’s novel, and it is about who gets to tell whose story. It says so, more than once, and that is the trouble with it. First the good news, which is considerable.

Ingram is the good news. Cleo keeps the books for Shell Gordon (Wood Harris), who runs the numbers from the back of a club, and by day she stands in a department-store window modelling dresses for white women who look straight through her. Ingram plays that stillness as effort; you can see her holding her face. We were held by her from the first window scene, and the reason is simple: the show keeps posing her as a symbol and she keeps insisting on being a person, with sore feet and two boys to feed. Shiona Turini’s costumes do a good deal of the work, the borrowed finery in the window against the plain wool coat Cleo actually owns.

Lachlan Milne shoots it all in deep, warm colour: the club in red and gold, the Schwartz kitchen the yellow of a period advertisement, the streets in a blue winter light. JC Molina’s Baltimore is dense and particular, pressed-tin ceilings, pawnshop windows, a newsroom that seems to smell of ash. Marcus Norris scores it in low jazz and then, when Har’el wants a dream, swells into something closer to a musical. The title sequence is the best-made minute in the series, and it plays seven times.

Portman is harder to settle on. She has a Baltimore accent that comes and goes and a character the writing cannot decide whether to admire or prosecute. Maddie leaves Milton (Brett Gelman) and their son Seth (Noah Jupe), talks her way into the paper past Bob Bauer (Pruitt Taylor Vince), and takes a lover, Ferdie (Y’lan Noel), a Black policeman she is careful not to be seen with. Portman plays it with a brittle brightness that works in the newsroom and less well at home, where she is asked to be the heroine and the cautionary example inside the same scene. She is also, on purpose, standing in front of the woman we want to watch.

The dream sequences are where it comes apart. Har’el has Maddie imagine herself into shop windows, into a dance number, into her own past, with Cleo narrating from beyond the grave, and the first two or three are startling. By the fifth episode we sighed when the colour shifted and the music swelled, because the story was about to stop and explain something it had already shown us. The editors cut between the two women’s kitchens with care, one answering the other, and then the voiceover arrives to tell us the homes are connected. The mystery itself, a missing girl, a body in the water, goes slack while the show attends to its meanings.

Har’el’s Honey Boy was a small film about a boy and his damaged father, and it knew how many ideas it could carry. This is a far bigger canvas and she has filled every inch of it. Harris, as Shell, gives the one performance that seems to have been left alone: quiet, amused, a man who has never needed to raise his voice, and every scene he is in feels like a different and better show about the same city. Against other period crime dramas it has more style than most and less patience with its plot than any.

The reviews so far split almost down the middle, and we understand both halves. If Ingram in that window is enough for you, and it may well be, there are seven hours here that never look less than considered. If you want a mystery that pulls, watch the first two episodes and decide whether you can take five more of being told what you have just seen.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

52
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
4

The reviews split almost down the middle: four positive, three mixed, four negative. Where the critics agree is on Moses Ingram, whose performance as Cleo is praised even by those who dislike the series around her, and on the look of the thing. The production design, costumes and score are widely admired, and several reviews find the atmosphere the strongest element on offer. Natalie Portman draws steadier if quieter approval.

The reservations cluster on the storytelling. Most critics complain that surreal digressions, heavy exposition and thick symbolism smother the mystery, and that the series says less about race and whose story gets told than it seems to. The spread is wide. The Guardian finds it masterly and dense enough to need time to absorb; The AV Club calls it a pretentious mess, and Variety finds it fails as a thriller altogether. Paste goes further still, preferring the title sequence to everything that follows it.

The Guardian
19 July 2024 · Lucy Mangan
90*

Mangan finds the series masterly, though so dense and sumptuous that viewers may need time to absorb it. She particularly praises Moses Ingram’s mesmerising performance and the show’s fearless, richly realised aesthetic.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
19 July 2024 · B · Ben Travers
77

Travers finds the series absorbing and rewarding despite occasional plot confusion and excessive symbolism. He praises Natalie Portman’s performance and the mesmeric atmosphere created by the production design, costumes, and score.

Read the full review →
Empire
19 July 2024 · Kelechi Ehenulo
75*

The series is a consistently surprising, compelling, and beguiling watch, though its style can sometimes outweigh substance. The critic particularly praises Moses Ingram’s fearless, scene-stealing performance.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
19 July 2024 · ★★★ · Madeleine Spencer
60

Spencer finds the series stylish and ultimately absorbing, though its setup moves too slowly and the adaptation feels abridged. She singles out the portrayal of the oppressive weight borne by the two women as its strongest element.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 July 2024 · Daniel Fienberg
50*

Fienberg finds the series smart and ambitious but uneven, with its ideas often overwhelming its narrative momentum. He praises Moses Ingram’s compelling performance and the audacious exploration of race, identity, and whose story gets told.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
19 July 2024 · Emily Baker
35*

Baker finds the series overblown and shallow, though not outright bad. She praises the acting and atmosphere, while criticizing the script and surreal digressions for distracting from the story.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Lady in the Lake worth watching?
Lady in the Lake is a mixed recommendation, and we scored it 57: it looks better than almost anything on television and cannot stop explaining itself. Moses Ingram, as a dead woman narrating her own story, is the reason to keep going. If you want a mystery that pulls rather than a series that underlines its meanings, watch two episodes and decide.
How long is Lady in the Lake, and what is it rated?
Lady in the Lake is rated D by the LSF in Indonesia. It is a drama and crime series.
Where can I watch Lady in the Lake in Indonesia?
Lady in the Lake is streaming on Apple TV in Indonesia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Lady in the Lake, and is it suitable for children?
Lady in the Lake carries a UK 15 certificate and is not for children. It is a murder story built around a missing girl and a body in the water, narrated by a woman who tells us in the first minutes that she is already dead, with an adulterous affair running alongside. Teenagers of fifteen and over will manage; the squeamish will find it more sombre than graphic.
What should I watch after Lady in the Lake?
After Lady in the Lake, try Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82): A body in the water, a woman investigator, and landscape doing the talking. Then Sharp Objects (2018, Fi1m 84): A journalist goes home to a murder; the editing carries the memory, not the narration; and Mildred Pierce (2011, Fi1m 70): A five-hour period drama about a woman leaving a marriage, patient where this is restless.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Wire (2002) · not on Fi1m yetThe same city, Wood Harris again, and a plot that trusts you to keep up.

  2. Devil in a Blue Dress (1995) · not on Fi1m yetPost-war Los Angeles noir with a Black detective and no voiceover explaining the point.

  3. Top of the Lake (2013, Fi1m 82)A body in the water, a woman investigator, and landscape doing the talking.

  4. Sharp Objects (2018, Fi1m 84)A journalist goes home to a murder; the editing carries the memory, not the narration.

  5. Mildred Pierce (2011, Fi1m 70)A five-hour period drama about a woman leaving a marriage, patient where this is restless.

Lady in the Lake (2024) review: Ingram is superb, the show is not (Indonesia) | Fi1m