Dave Gudsen (Taron Egerton) holds a camera beside Michelle Calderone (Jurnee Smollett-Bell) in a smoky hallway
Series review

Smoke

2025 · Created by Dennis Lehane · Series · IFCO 18

In a sentenceThe fire brigade cannot fix everything wrong with these men

An arson investigator and a detective pursue fire-starters in a case that brings questions of delusion, trauma and self-deception into their work. As they hunt those responsible, the investigation also examines how people explain themselves and the harm they cause. Taron Egerton plays Dave Gudsen, with Jurnee Smollett-Bell as Michelle Calderone and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine as Freddy Fasano. The cast also includes Hannah Emily Anderson as Ashley Gudsen, Greg Kinnear as Harvey Englehart and John Leguizamo as Esposito. Across nine episodes, Smoke follows the pursuit and the people involved.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The cast makes Smoke worth considering, especially Taron Egerton and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, but the arson investigation cannot sustain nine episodes. Its later repetitions turn a disturbing crime drama into a frustrating one.

Smoke is worth considering for its cast, though anyone coming chiefly for a tightly plotted crime story should be wary. Across nine episodes, an arson investigation becomes a way of looking at delusion, trauma and the stories people tell about themselves. Dennis Lehane and his fellow writers have good reason to look beyond the business of finding the culprits. The difficulty is that the investigation still has to hold our attention, and too often it seems to be waiting for the characters to finish explaining themselves.

Taron Egerton plays Dave Gudsen with a disquieting confidence that makes his account of himself hard to take at face value. We were unnerved by him: Dave seems so persuaded by his own explanations that there is little chance of talking him out of them. This is difficult acting to sustain, since the audience must remain interested in a man it cannot comfortably accept on his own terms. Egerton manages it, even when the writing makes the same point about him again.

Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, as Freddy Fasano, is the stronger reason to stay. He makes Freddy’s distress difficult to treat as just another clue, and the performance remains troubling when the mechanics of the case have become tiresome. Jurnee Smollett-Bell’s Michelle Calderone gives the series another performance worth attending to, though Egerton and Mwine make the stronger impression. There is enough care in the acting to keep these people interesting through passages that do little to advance the pursuit.

François Dagenais and Sam McCurdy make the fires hard to stop watching. Their cinematography makes watching something burn disturbingly attractive, a useful discomfort in a story about arson. Jeremy Stanbridge’s production design is less memorable; the carefully finished surroundings do not tell us much more about the people occupying them. Directors Jim McKay, Joe Chappelle and Kari Skogland give the series a consistent visual confidence, and the images retain their force even when the investigation starts to feel overextended.

The music by Saunder Jurriaans and Danny Bensi sustains a sense of threat, although it cannot supply the urgency missing from the plotting. A cat-and-mouse thriller needs each encounter to change what the pursuer or the pursued can do. Here, the later episodes repeat what the actors have already told us about the characters, and the pursuit loses momentum. Questions about how the plot fits together become harder to ignore as its developments grow less persuasive. The writing needs to make those developments convincing before asking the cast to sell them.

This suits an evening when we want to watch actors working through difficult characters and do not mind taking the long route. It is a poorer choice for anyone hoping to examine the evidence and keep pace with a neatly assembled case. Settle in for the performances, but do not expect the investigation to become more disciplined.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics come down in favour, if without much heat: four of six reviews are positive and none is negative. The praise clusters on the cast. Egerton’s lead is called unnerving once an early twist has landed, and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine is named as the standout by Variety, The Hollywood Reporter and Collider. Several also credit the choice of arson as the crime, and the way the fires themselves are filmed, for giving the series something most detective dramas lack.

The reservations are almost all about the back half. Reviewers who enjoy the set-up say the cat-and-mouse turns repetitive, then absurd, and that the writing never quite matches the acting or the images. The spread is narrow, from the mid-fifties to the mid-seventies, so nobody hates it and nobody is carried away. The AV Club is the lowest, saying the chases lose steam and leave plot questions unanswered; Radio Times finds the backstories and lead pairing competent rather than remarkable.

IndieWire
27 June 2025 · Ben Travers
75*

The critic calls it a sicko pulp thriller driven by dark truths in another dual portrait of bad men. It tracks an arson investigator and detective hunting fire-starters with thrilling entertainment and sharp social insights.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 June 2025 · Daniel Fienberg
70*

The critic calls the series flawed but fascinating, praising its extraordinarily well-acted ensemble and the way it explores self-definition and narrative even as twists and repetition weaken the execution. He singles out Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine’s haunting performance as the show’s standout.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 June 2025 · Alison Herman
70*

The critic finds “Smoke” deeply satisfying overall as a true-crime series centered on a cat-and-mouse arson investigation, especially as a showcase for Egerton’s masterfully unnerving lead performance after a key early twist. She singles out the strong ensemble cast, including Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, for particular praise while noting the show grows repetitive and absurd in its later episodes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
6.6/10 · Jack Seale
66

The critic praises the show's focus on arson as a distinctive crime and fire as a powerful element that sets the series apart from standard detective stories. Backstories and lead chemistry are handled competently but the review highlights the procedural and character elements as solid without being groundbreaking.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
12 June 2025 · C · Tim Lowery
57

The miniseries has plenty of style, strong cast performances, and stylish direction but its narrative momentum burns out in the back half. The critic singles out the loss of steam in cat-and-mouse chases and some glaring plot questions as drawbacks despite themes of delusion and trauma.

Read the full review →
Collider
12 June 2025 · 7/10 · David Caballero
70

The miniseries is a solid, compelling crime drama that succeeds on the strength of its cast and striking visuals but lacks enough bite and originality to fully ignite. It singles out the stunning fire cinematography and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine's magnetic performance as highlights amid familiar writing and pacing issues.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Smoke worth watching?
Smoke is worth watching for its cast, chiefly Taron Egerton and Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine, and we scored it 68. Anyone wanting a tightly plotted arson thriller should be wary, because the investigation cannot hold nine episodes and the later ones repeat what the actors have already shown us. Settle in for the performances rather than the case.
How long is Smoke, and what is it rated?
Smoke is rated 18 by the IFCO in Ireland. It is a drama and crime series.
Where can I watch Smoke in Ireland?
Smoke is streaming on Apple TV in Ireland. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Smoke, and is it suitable for children?
Smoke carries an 18 certificate in the UK and TV-MA in the US, so it is not for children. The series is a disturbing crime drama about arson, with fires shot to be unsettlingly attractive and characters whose delusion and trauma are hard to sit with. Teenagers and anyone squeamish about fire should treat it as adult viewing.
How does Smoke compare to Mississippi Burning?
Smoke and Mississippi Burning both build patient suspicion from performances that make ordinary encounters hard to read, but the film is the tighter of the two. Alan Parker's thriller keeps its tension over a single running time, while the series spreads a thinner investigation across nine episodes. Choose Smoke for the acting, the film for a story that keeps moving.
What should I watch after Smoke?
After Smoke, try Cure (1997, Fi1m 85): For another investigation where disturbing behaviour matters as much as finding the culprit. Then The Vanishing (1988, Fi1m 88): A patient, uncomfortable pursuit driven by an obsessive need to understand; and Burning (2018, Fi1m 72): For patient suspicion and performances that make ordinary encounters difficult to read.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Cure (1997, Fi1m 85)For another investigation where disturbing behaviour matters as much as finding the culprit.

  2. The Vanishing (1988, Fi1m 88)A patient, uncomfortable pursuit driven by an obsessive need to understand.

  3. The Fall (2013) · not reviewed yetAnother crime series carried by the uneasy attention paid to its central adversaries.

  4. Burning (2018, Fi1m 72)For patient suspicion and performances that make ordinary encounters difficult to read.

  5. The Pledge (2001) · not reviewed yetA troubled investigator and a case that resists becoming a reassuring story.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever