Series review

Squid Game

2021 · Directed by Hwang Dong-hyuk · Series · 15

In a sentenceA children’s game with a cash prize and an appalling amount of cleaning up

Action & AdventureMysteryDrama

Seong Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae) joins a competition in which people in financial trouble play children’s games for a cash prize. The rules appear familiar, but losing carries lethal consequences. As the games proceed, contestants have to judge whom they can trust and what they are prepared to do to stay in contention. Among the players are Cho Sang-woo (Park Hae-soo) and Kang Sae-byeok (Hoyeon). Written and directed by Hwang Dong-hyuk, Squid Game follows the competitors’ shifting alliances as the prospect of money puts their loyalties under pressure.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Hwang Dong-hyuk’s deadly competition drama earns its shocks through the desperation of its players and the cruelty of its children’s games. The speeches can be blunt, but the fear and fellow feeling are hard to shake.

Squid Game is a gripping, sometimes over-explained drama about people who cannot afford to walk away from a terrible offer. Writer-director Hwang Dong-hyuk puts financially desperate contestants into lethal children’s games, then makes the prospect of winning money disturb every relationship between them. The cruelty has a purpose, and for much of the series it is enough to watch what people will accept when their alternatives have narrowed. We recommend it, with a warning that neither its violence nor its speeches are used sparingly.

The opening Red Light, Green Light sequence establishes how well this can work. We were horrified, because a game built around a rule children can understand becomes a means of killing adults who badly need the prize. Lee Hyung-deok’s cinematography keeps the danger from becoming an invitation to admire the violence, and Nam Na-young’s editing makes waiting for the next punishment exhausting. Hwang allows the horror of applying those rules to desperate people to do much of the work.

Chae Kyoung-sun’s production design keeps the association with childhood uncomfortably present during the violence. The reminder of play makes the killing harder to dismiss as ordinary action spectacle, even when the competition has us absorbed. The music credited to Jung Jae-il, Park Min-joo and Kim Sung-soo adds to that unease, although the contests are frightening enough without musical persuasion. More telling still is the attention paid to the practical work behind the violence, the routine organisation required to keep this entertainment functioning.

Lee Jung-jae gives Seong Gi-hun enough vulnerability to make his financial desperation painful to watch. We care how he fares, because the performance makes needing the money credible even when accepting the risks seems unthinkable. Park Hae-soo as Cho Sang-woo and Hoyeon as Kang Sae-byeok make the questions of trust feel personal, giving us reasons to follow the alliances beyond their usefulness in the competition. Hwang is persuasive when he lets these relationships carry the pressure of the prize money.

The writing is less assured when Hwang pauses to tell us what the competition means. Dialogue about inequality can become so direct that the characters sound as though they are delivering speeches, after the games have already made the point. Some character development is thin enough that the actors have to supply complexity the script has not earned. The material about shifting alliances is usually stronger, because there is a specific person to lose faith in and an immediate cost to getting that judgement wrong.

There is also a fair objection to the pleasure the series takes in devising ordeals while condemning the people who organise them. We do not think it entirely escapes that problem, but the dreary business of running the games matters. By attending to the work behind the killing, Hwang shows how many ordinary tasks are needed to keep the cruelty going. Within the deadly-competition genre, that is a useful emphasis, giving us something to consider beyond which contestant might survive the next round. Choose it for the people under pressure, and be prepared for how much punishment accompanies them.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
0
Negative
1
Vulture
8 October 2021 · Kathryn VanArendonk
80*

The series excels as a bleak portrait of financial despair and the exploitation of nostalgia rather than hopeful resilience. It stands out for its precise depiction of how the end times already feel present in everyday economic struggle.

Read the full review →
Variety
8 October 2021 · Daniel D'Addario
40*

The series is thin on development and ideas, amplifying violence and inhumanity while offering only banal philosophizing about inequality and goodness. It revels in gruesomeness and fetishizes death in a having-it-both-ways manner that flatters viewers for enjoying it.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
16 September 2021 · ★★★★½ · Kayti Burt
90

The series makes strong use of its familiar deadly competition premise and executes its tropes effectively from the start. It singles out the visceral impact of the opening Red Light, Green Light sequence for its unflinching horror.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
30 September 2021 · Brian Phillips
85*

The critic finds the series terrifically compelling as both entertainment and moral allegory, praising its refusal to glamorize the violence or make the action look cool. It singles out the show's attention to the mundane logistics and drudgery behind the murders as what makes the critique effective.

Read the full review →
NME
20 September 2021 · ★★★★ · Hidzir Junaini
80

The series is a sharp allegory about inequality and a rigged system under late-stage capitalism, where desperate contestants are compelled to play deadly children's games for a huge cash prize. The critic praises its thematic intelligence alongside the visceral tension of the games and the shifting alliances and betrayals among players.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Battle Royale poster

Battle Royale

2000 · Another lethal contest, with younger competitors and less patience for polite explanations

They Shoot Horses, Don't They? poster

They Shoot Horses, Don't They?

1969 · Financial desperation turns public entertainment into an endurance test nobody should accept

13 Tzameti poster

13 Tzameti

2005 · A harsher, leaner encounter with people who organise terror for their own pleasure

Parasite poster

Parasite

2019 · For class resentment expressed through domestic arrangements and increasingly difficult moral choices

The Platform poster

The Platform

2019 · Another blunt social allegory that makes inequality a matter of physical survival