Series review

In a sentenceEleven episodes is a long time to spend regretting an injection

DramaSci-Fi & Fantasy

A shot promises to make people beautiful, turning the wish for a different body into a treatment. The Beauty follows that promise into a story of physical transformation, beauty sold as a commodity and the harm that can accompany it. Evan Peters plays Cooper Madsen and Jeremy Pope plays Jeremy, with Ashton Kutcher as Byron Forst and Anthony Ramos as Antonio. Combining science fiction, drama and body horror, the series concerns the pursuit of physical perfection, the value placed on appearances and the risks people take to change how they look.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Ryan Murphy’s body-horror series delivers enough gruesome invention and committed acting to reward a strong stomach. Its beauty-industry satire is blunt, though, and an eleven-episode season gives the scattered storytelling too much space.

The Beauty is worth considering for the grotesque transformations and the actors willing to take them seriously; its satire gives us much less to work with. Writers Matthew Hodgson and Ryan Murphy start with a useful horror premise: physical perfection can be acquired, and the treatment can do terrible damage. That should be enough to support both disgust and uncomfortable recognition. Across eleven episodes, however, the series keeps finding more things to include without looking much harder at why people want to be beautiful.

The transformations work. We were disgusted by the prolonged bodily damage, because the effects make becoming beautiful look physically unbearable. There is enough time to register the process rather than simply wait for a splash of blood, and that patience matters: the treatment begins to seem like something a person must endure. The practical effects do more to question the promise of a better body than the dialogue, which too often spells out what the gore has already made clear.

Evan Peters, as Cooper Madsen, supplies the seriousness this material needs to make its horrors matter. Jeremy Pope’s Jeremy gives us another reason to stay interested in the people, even when the writing is impatient to introduce another idea. Ashton Kutcher’s Byron Forst and Anthony Ramos’s Antonio are game for the series’ excesses. The cast’s willingness to commit is a considerable virtue, particularly when the tone cannot settle between black comedy and horror.

Jason McCormick and Stanley Fernandez Jr.’s cinematography gives the promised perfection a glossy appeal, making the ugliness harder to shrug off. Production designers Ioannis Papadopoulos, Marci Mudd and Kim Jennings help sustain that expensive-looking fantasy. The trouble is that the polished surroundings remain seductive even when the writing wants us to distrust the whole business of selling beauty. That contradiction could have been uncomfortable in a useful way, but the series rarely seems curious enough about its own pleasure in attractive people and their surroundings.

Editors Caroline Wang, Travis Weaver, Shannon Baker Davis, Philip Welch, Peggy Tachdjian and Julia Franklin cannot keep the growing number of storylines equally engaging. The early pace slackens, and movement between strands becomes something to sit through before the next sustained piece of horror. Mac Quayle’s music adds to the general overstatement, though it is more effective when the horror dominates than when the performances need space. We wanted a quieter stretch in which someone could hold our attention without another outrage being prepared.

Body horror becomes more disturbing when we understand why someone would risk such damage in the first place. Here, the writing repeatedly tells us that appearance has become a commodity, then treats that observation as sufficient. The uneven shifts into camp can be enjoyable, and we would not ask this programme to become a lecture. We would ask it to trust an ugly image, or a committed performance, without explaining the lesson quite so firmly.

There is enough gruesome invention here to interest anyone curious about what a beauty treatment might do to human flesh. The performances and effects make the scattered storytelling frustrating, because this could have been a much tighter programme. We would reserve it for committed body-horror viewers with patience for digression; anyone arriving for a searching account of beauty and power should make other plans.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
8
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics find The Beauty entertaining despite its shallow satire, with praise clustering around the grotesque body horror, practical effects and performances. The combination of camp comedy and gruesome transformations works for the more enthusiastic reviewers, who also welcome its interest in beauty standards and the treatment of beauty as a commodity. Peters and Hall draw praise, as do several supporting and guest performances.

Reservations centre on blunt messaging, familiar ideas and a story that becomes scattered, with even favourable reviews acknowledging the lack of depth. The spread is wide: a clear majority enjoy the excess, but a small minority find it empty or exhausting. The Independent regards the flashy visuals and unsubtle exposition as inferior to the series’ influences, notably The Substance. IndieWire is harsher still, finding the episodes plodding and, against much of the consensus, the gruesome transformations unmemorable.

Empire
22 January 2026 · David Opie
80*

The critic calls the series an absolute riot, praising its gruesome thrills, entertaining clash of camp and gravitas led by strong performances from Peters and Hall, and vile prosthetics and effects.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
21 January 2026 · ★★★★ · Anita Singh
80

The critic calls the series a wild, kitschy body-horror satire on weight-loss jabs and beauty obsession, with gruesome effects and strong performances from the leads grounding the chaos.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 January 2026 · B · Jarrod Jones
77

The critic praises the series as a playfully profane satire with skin-deep pleasures, stylish visuals, and engrossing performances in its back half, while noting it wears its influences loudly and can be cloyingly grandiose.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
21 January 2026 · India Block
75*

The review praises the high-concept, gory body-horror premise as a fun, campy Murphy vehicle with strong guest turns and timely satire on beauty standards, calling it an addictive super-hot mess.

Read the full review →
The Times
23 January 2026 · Carol Midgley
75*

The review describes the black comedy as a return to form for Ryan Murphy, an off-its-rocker parody of the Ozempic age that is funny and bingeable despite heavy messaging.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 January 2026 · Aramide Tinubu
70*

The critic calls it a mostly enjoyable but chaotic and imperfect ride that dares to explore pretty privilege and the perils of beauty as a commodity. They single out the grotesque, prolonged body horror transformations (and the blood/guts) for praise while complaining that the story splinters and loses focus after the strong early episodes.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Seconds poster

Seconds

1966 · Another promised fresh start, with the cost written into the body.

Eyes Without a Face poster

Eyes Without a Face

1960 · Surgical horror that gives damaged faces and desperate love equal attention.

The Skin I Live In poster

The Skin I Live In

2011 · For more controlled unease about beauty, bodily autonomy and medical power.

Helter Skelter poster

Helter Skelter

2012 · A model’s manufactured perfection makes for harsher scrutiny of the beauty business.

Safe poster

Safe

1995 · A quieter, more unsettling look at bodily distress and promises of treatment.