A young woman and an older woman stand together indoors, looking ahead
Film review

A Kiss Before Dying

1991 · Directed by James Dearden · 1h 35m · MPA R

In a sentenceA psychopath this charming deserves people who can spot a clue

Jonathan Corliss (Matt Dillon) is a psychopath whose charm conceals the danger he poses. Around him are Ellen and Dorothy Carlsson, both played by Sean Young, and Thor Carlsson (Max von Sydow). His ability to seem harmless makes it difficult for those around him to recognise what they are dealing with. As clues to his character emerge, the question is who will take them seriously, and when. Adapted from Ira Levin’s novel, the story follows the gap between Jonathan’s outward manner and the intentions he keeps concealed.

Fi1m review

Matt Dillon supplies credible charm and menace, but James Dearden’s thriller gives him unconvincing relationships and too little suspense. The handsome finish cannot disguise a screenplay that keeps its heroine several steps behind the audience.

James Dearden’s A Kiss Before Dying has a promising centre in Matt Dillon and too little suspense around him. It is a poor thriller, with enough polish to suggest that something more involving ought to be happening. Adapting Ira Levin’s novel for the screen, the director depends on the difference between Jonathan Corliss’s agreeable manner and his psychopathy. That gives his leading actor something to play, although the screenplay too often expects everyone else’s slow understanding to keep the story moving.

Matt Dillon is worth watching because he does not advertise each change in Jonathan Corliss’s manner. His charm is credible, and he lets the unpleasantness show without discarding it, so the performance makes sense as a way of getting close to people. We were briefly unsettled by how little his friendly manner had to change to become threatening. The trouble is that his control is doing work the surrounding scenes ought to share.

Sean Young, playing Ellen and Dorothy Carlsson, has the more exposed assignment. The screenplay asks the heroine to overlook clues that have already registered with us, and she cannot make that delay convincing. Her dual performance offers too little distinction or feeling to compensate, while her scenes with Matt Dillon lack the attraction that might explain such poor judgement. Once we start waiting for a character to notice the obvious, concern gives way to impatience. That is a serious problem for a thriller built around misplaced trust.

Mike Southon’s cinematography gives the film a composed, attractive surface, and Jim Clay’s production design helps make that finish coherent. Those are real virtues: there is no reason a crime thriller must look grubby to feel dangerous. Yet the handsome presentation seldom makes Jonathan Corliss’s company more uncomfortable, or gives his charm an extra edge. The film looks assured even when the scenes are struggling to hold our attention.

Michael Bradsell’s editing cannot solve the problem of a story that makes us wait for people to catch up. The delays become conspicuous because James Dearden has not made the heroine’s failure to understand sufficiently plausible. Howard Shore’s music offers some unease, but it cannot give these encounters the force missing from the relationships and writing. At 95 minutes, the film is hardly sprawling; it still contains stretches in which our attention has little to settle on beyond the leading man.

A thriller can let us recognise a dangerous man early and still frighten us, provided we believe the people who do not. It can also make their mistakes interesting enough that we keep following them despite ourselves. The director never gives the relationships that degree of conviction, and the familiar suspense situations offer little distraction from their weakness. Knowing that somebody is dangerous becomes tiresome when the film keeps postponing everyone else’s understanding of it.

There is a limited pleasure here for anyone interested in watching a capable actor find small variations inside a familiar part. Anyone coming for a persuasive relationship or a sustained sense of threat will have a less rewarding evening. The professional finish makes the weak writing more frustrating, because the film has plainly received care elsewhere. Make time for it only if Matt Dillon’s performance is the attraction.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

34
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
5

Most critics find A Kiss Before Dying a weak thriller, with five negative reviews and one mixed assessment. The main point of agreement is its failure to generate suspense. Praise centres on Matt Dillon: Radio Times finds him chilling and persuasive as a charming psychopath, while Empire admires the subtlety and adaptability of his performance. Those notices give the film a credible lead, but find too little tension or sufficiently developed plotting around him.

The reservations range from derivative set pieces and unconvincing characterisation to the leads’ lack of chemistry. There is some variation within the largely negative response: Empire finds entertainment despite the film’s unfinished feel, whereas the Los Angeles Times sees a thriller that deteriorates as it proceeds. The New York Times supplies the least negative indication, but only its headline is available; its description of a handsome, modest film cannot establish a fuller dissent.

The New York Times
26 April 1991 · Janet Maslin
69*

The headline characterizes the film as handsome but modest, while emphasizing its murderous premise. The article text is unavailable, so its fuller verdict and specific praise cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · John Ferguson
40

Ferguson says the thriller fails to generate real tension despite Matt Dillon’s chilling performance. He praises Dillon’s charming portrayal of a psychopath, while faulting Sean Young’s unconvincing dual role and the derivative set pieces.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
35*

Newman finds the remake entertaining but ultimately unfinished, with an abrupt ending that leaves major plot threads unresolved. He praises Matt Dillon’s subtle, adaptable performance as the film’s main strength.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· BC
30*

The critic finds Dearden’s adaptation routine, neither thrilling nor revealing. The review particularly faults it as a portrait of a psychopath.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1990 · Variety Staff
20*

The critic finds the film a clunker when played straight. They single out Sean Young’s bland performance and the leads’ lack of chemistry.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 April 1991 · Peter Rainer
10*

Rainer strongly pans the film as a botched thriller that grows worse as it goes along. He faults its lack of suspense, singling out how the heroine takes too long to spot clues that seem obvious from the start.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is A Kiss Before Dying worth watching?
A Kiss Before Dying is worth considering only for Matt Dillon’s performance; we score this poor thriller 38 out of 100. His credible charm and menace offer some pleasure, but unconvincing relationships and a heroine kept several steps behind the audience leave too little suspense to recommend it more widely.
How long is A Kiss Before Dying, and what is it rated?
A Kiss Before Dying runs 1h 35m and is rated R by the MPA in the US. It is a mystery and thriller film.
Where can I watch A Kiss Before Dying in the US?
A Kiss Before Dying is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is A Kiss Before Dying, and is it suitable for children?
A Kiss Before Dying carries a UK 15 certificate and is unsuitable for children under 15. We find Dillon’s shift from friendliness to menace briefly unsettling, but the film offers little sustained suspense; that judgement is not an assurance that its content suits younger viewers or the squeamish.
How does A Kiss Before Dying compare to Shadow of a Doubt?
A Kiss Before Dying is the weaker choice beside Shadow of a Doubt, which we recommend for a more convincing thriller about a welcome guest whose charm conceals danger. Hitchcock makes family affection a reason to fear what people cannot recognise, while Dearden relies too heavily on his heroine overlooking clues the audience already understands.
Is A Kiss Before Dying based on a true story or a book?
A Kiss Before Dying is adapted from Ira Levin’s novel, rather than presented as a true story. Knowing the book is not necessary to grasp the central premise of a charming man concealing dangerous intentions; our reservations concern the film’s unconvincing relationships and delayed recognition of obvious clues, not its fidelity to the source.
What should I watch after A Kiss Before Dying?
After A Kiss Before Dying, try Shadow of a Doubt (1943, Fi1m 88): For another persuasive charmer whose welcome ought to come with questions. Then The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89): Class ambition and uneasy dependence, with performances that make every courtesy suspicious; and The Last Seduction (1994, Fi1m 81): A crime thriller that gives its manipulator wit and everyone else believable weaknesses.

Cast

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress, 1992

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress, 1992

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress

If you liked this, try…

  1. Purple Noon (1960) · not reviewed yetA charming opportunist receives the patient attention and mounting suspicion that this film needs.

  2. Shadow of a Doubt (1943, Fi1m 88)For another persuasive charmer whose welcome ought to come with questions.

  3. The Servant (1963, Fi1m 89)Class ambition and uneasy dependence, with performances that make every courtesy suspicious.

  4. The Housemaid (1960) · not reviewed yetDomestic trust becomes perilous through carefully established desires, resentments and divided loyalties.

  5. The Last Seduction (1994, Fi1m 81)A crime thriller that gives its manipulator wit and everyone else believable weaknesses.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever