Mera and Arthur Curry confer with another man over a map in a flooded ruin
Film review

Aquaman

2018 · Directed by James Wan · 2h 23m

In a sentenceAtlantis would be an excellent place for a holiday if somebody could cancel the speeches

Arthur Curry (Jason Momoa) is Aquaman, at the centre of an adventure set partly in the underwater world of Atlantis. Mera (Amber Heard) and King Orm Marius (Patrick Wilson) are among the figures in a story that brings Arthur into contact with royal politics and undersea conflict. Nuidis Vulko (Willem Dafoe) and Atlanna (Nicole Kidman) also feature as Arthur’s personal journey shares space with political intrigue and romance. The story moves between land and sea, combining superhero action with a fantasy world of underwater inhabitants.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Wan’s underwater adventure is good fun whenever Jason Momoa and the extravagant settings take charge. The political chatter and excessive length wear it down, but there is enough invention to justify the trip.

James Wan’s Aquaman works best when it lets its underwater fantasy take over and gives Jason Momoa room to enjoy himself. We recommend it as a colourful, cheerfully excessive adventure, provided there is patience for a script that explains more than it needs to. The director understands that an underwater kingdom is already a fairly extravagant proposition and need not be made respectable. The trouble is that the film keeps interrupting its pleasures to conduct another round of royal business.

Jason Momoa makes Arthur Curry an agreeable guide through all this, with a relaxed manner that gives the solemn dialogue some welcome human scale. He can carry the film without making every exchange sound like a declaration of importance. Amber Heard’s Mera is less rewarding company, largely because the romance gives the pair so little convincing attraction to play. Nicole Kidman, as Atlanna, brings a composure that survives the surrounding fuss, though the film gives us too little of her.

Bill Brzeski’s production design makes Atlantis worth the visit, filling the film with undersea settings that do not all look interchangeable. Don Burgess’s cinematography helps the underwater action remain readable even when the colour threatens to crowd everything else out. We were delighted by Atlantis: its bright, elaborate undersea spaces made us want to look around rather than hurry to the next fight. That pleasure matters in a film which spends so much time explaining its world.

The screenplay by David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick and Will Beall is much less inviting. Its political intrigue requires attention without offering enough interesting choices or relationships to repay it, and Arthur’s personal development feels thin beside all the activity around him. We can follow the broad shape of this origin story without needing quite so much information about the society beneath the water. Too many conversations seem to exist because somebody has decided that the next action sequence requires a briefing.

Kirk M. Morri’s editing is more persuasive within the action than between it, and the Sicily chase has the energy the talkier stretches lack. James Wan handles movement with enough invention to make the change of setting worthwhile, rather than merely another stop on a long itinerary. But the full 143 minutes feel stretched, with too many competing demands on our attention. The film needed fewer things to explain and more time spent making Arthur’s decisions matter.

The music, credited to Rupert Gregson-Williams and Joseph Bishara, adds to the sense of a film reluctant to let the excitement subside. We could have used a little less encouragement. Some of the effects also make the fighting feel weightless, which limits how much danger can register amid the elaborate action. The director’s gift for arranging an image often compensates, but there are passages where the combat becomes difficult to care about.

It is refreshing to have a superhero adventure that takes such pleasure in looking ridiculous. Aquaman is at its most enjoyable when it allows colour, movement and Jason Momoa’s easy charm to do the work; the attempts at political drama rarely improve it. That leaves a good evening for anyone with an appetite for expansive fantasy and a tolerance for clumsy dialogue. Choose it for the underwater adventure, and allow for more speeches than the occasion requires.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

58
Positive
8
Mixed
12
Negative
5

The consensus on Aquaman is mixed, with most critics finding something to enjoy in its underwater spectacle even when the storytelling disappoints. Praise clusters around the vivid undersea settings, inventive action and James Wan’s willingness to embrace colour and outright silliness. Jason Momoa’s relaxed charm is another recurring strength, including in several otherwise negative reviews. For the more enthusiastic critics, the camp and visual imagination make a familiar superhero origin story entertaining.

The reservations are fairly consistent: excessive length, an overstuffed plot, clumsy dialogue and thin character development. The verdicts nevertheless spread widely, depending on how much those pleasures compensate. /Film welcomes the oddness and the blend of camp and adventure, despite weak romance and political intrigue. The Guardian instead finds the experience laborious and solemn, while singling out Nicole Kidman for praise. Even sympathetic reviews tend to concede that the film has more incident than it needs.

Vulture
11 December 2018 · Emily Yoshida
75*

Yoshida finds the film formulaic and overstuffed, but ultimately fun and transportive. She singles out its visually imaginative underwater world-building as the film’s chief strength.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 December 2018 · Kenneth Turan
70*

Turan finds the overstuffed film engaging despite its formulaic dialogue and excessive action. He praises Jason Momoa’s casting and the vivid underwater spectacle, especially Atlantis’s convincing visual effects.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 December 2018 · Tim Grierson
70*

The review presents Aquaman as a goofy, entertaining addition to the Justice League franchise. It singles out the film’s goofy fun as its chief appeal.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
11 December 2018 · B- · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
70

Vishnevetsky finds the film big, cheesy, and fun, though its underwater inhabitants lack the hero’s appeal. He praises the movie’s playful embrace of its own goofiness and its colorful, constantly changing settings.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 December 2018 · Peter Debruge
65*

Debruge finds the film an entertaining but overlong origin story, with too much uninteresting world-building before it hits its stride. He praises the spectacular, satisfying underwater finale, while criticizing the clumsy script and distracting visual effects.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
11 December 2018 · 3/3/2 · Elena Lazic
60

Lazic finds the film disappointing, overlong, and unable to balance its competing tones. She praises the lively Sicily action sequence, while faulting the hero’s underdeveloped personal journey.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Aquaman worth watching?
Aquaman is worth watching for its colourful underwater fantasy and Jason Momoa’s easy charm; we score it 72 out of 100. We recommend it to anyone who enjoys extravagant superhero adventures, though the royal politics, unconvincing romance and stretched 143-minute running time require patience.
How long is Aquaman, and what is it rated?
Aquaman runs 2h 23m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Aquaman in Slovenia?
Aquaman is streaming on HBO Max and Netflix in Slovenia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Aquaman, and is it suitable for children?
Aquaman carries a UK 12A certificate and contains sustained superhero fighting, making it a more comfortable choice for teenagers than younger children. Under-12s need an accompanying adult at the cinema; we find that some weightless effects soften the sense of danger, but that does not make its extensive action suitable for every child.
How does Aquaman compare to Flash Gordon?
Aquaman offers a more engaging hero than Flash Gordon, while both favour extravagant settings and royal intrigue over restraint. We prefer Jason Momoa’s relaxed charm to the blank hero described in our Flash Gordon review, but the latter is the better fit for knowingly excessive comic-strip adventure. Neither keeps its storytelling tight throughout.
What should I watch after Aquaman?
After Aquaman, try Flash Gordon (1980, Fi1m 70): More royal intrigue in extravagant surroundings, with even less concern for restraint. Then The Fifth Element (1997, Fi1m 73): Another muscular hero negotiates a colourful fantasy civilisation and some questionable dialogue.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2019

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Flash Gordon (1980, Fi1m 70)More royal intrigue in extravagant surroundings, with even less concern for restraint.

  2. Ponyo (2008) · not reviewed yetFor underwater invention and a warmer, more patient approach to wonder.

  3. The Fifth Element (1997, Fi1m 73)Another muscular hero negotiates a colourful fantasy civilisation and some questionable dialogue.

  4. The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958) · not reviewed yetA shorter fantasy adventure with creatures worth taking the journey to meet.

  5. The Host (2006) · not reviewed yetFor another aquatic creature feature, with sharper humour and consequences that hurt.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever