Film review

Coyote vs. Acme

2026 · Directed by Dave Green · 1h 43m · MPA PG

In a sentenceAfter all those explosions, the coyote has finally found a use for paperwork

ComedyAdventureFamily

Wile E. Coyote takes the Acme Corporation to court over its faulty contraptions, turning a history of cartoon injuries into a legal dispute. Will Forte plays Kevin Avery, with John Cena as Buddy Crane and Lana Condor as Paige Avery. The case brings live-action performers and animated Looney Tunes characters together in a story of corporate responsibility, an underdog’s search for redress and a friendship between a coyote and a lawyer. Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck and Foghorn Leghorn are among the characters voiced by Eric Bauza.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Dave Green’s cartoon courtroom comedy is funny, affectionate and unexpectedly touching. The corporate satire settles for easy targets, but the friendship between a coyote and his lawyer gives the silliness someone to care about.

The useful joke in Coyote vs. Acme is that someone has decided to treat cartoon injuries as a problem that might require compensation. Wile E. Coyote’s complaint against the corporation gives director Dave Green a reason to put Looney Tunes slapstick inside a courtroom comedy. It is a good, funny family film, with enough affection for its battered claimant to make the familiar legal plotting tolerable. Green understands the appeal of watching impossible things happen to bodies that can take it. He also makes the coyote worth spending time with between accidents.

Samy Burch’s screenplay gets considerable mileage out of letting the two sorts of comedy coexist. A faulty contraption can supply a physical joke and a reason to question the company selling it, without requiring a speech between the two. The company’s arrogance also provides jokes that do not require another explosion. We laughed at the explosive accidents, and then wanted somebody to take the coyote’s complaint seriously. The friendship with his lawyer gives that sympathy somewhere to go without requiring the film to abandon its foolishness.

Will Forte, as Kevin Avery, helps considerably. His performance keeps the human part of the film from becoming dead time between cartoon appearances, and he accepts the silliness without looking embarrassed by it. Green leaves room for warmth in a story that could have been entirely about finding new forms of injury. The coyote and the lawyer are likeable company, which matters when the court business begins to feel familiar.

Brandon Trost’s cinematography and Steve Arnold’s production design make the shared space for humans and cartoons convincing enough to sustain the joke. The live-action world has to remain legible while animated bodies ignore its rules, and for most of the film it does. There are moments when the two look less comfortably joined, but they do not undo the pleasure of the combination. The more successful passages allow the animated characters to disrupt the live-action scenes without making their human companions seem irrelevant.

Carsten Kurpanek’s editing gives the physical comedy a welcome briskness, although it cannot make every stretch of legal business equally lively. At 103 minutes, the film is short enough to remain agreeable and long enough for the courtroom conventions to start repeating themselves. Steven Price’s music contributes to the energy, but it is the timing of a sight gag that most often earns the laugh. Burch is less successful when she leans on the legal thriller than when she develops the friendship.

The corporate satire is less satisfying. Acme’s wrongdoing is an easy thing to oppose, and the film seldom makes that opposition uncomfortable or complicated. That keeps it accessible as family entertainment, but makes a premise built around corporate malpractice rather less pointed than it promises to be. Against the unruliness of the cartoons it honours, the feature can seem a little too well behaved. Green has made an amiable underdog comedy where there was room for something more mischievous.

An audience need not be fluent in Looney Tunes references to enjoy the company here. Eric Bauza’s roster of voices offers plenty for those who are, and the familiar characters retain their comic usefulness. The in-jokes are a bonus rather than homework, so there is no need to organise a childhood refresher course beforehand. Watch it with people who still laugh when cartoon machinery goes wrong.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
12
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Coyote vs. Acme as a funny, affectionate adaptation that understands the Looney Tunes appetite for destruction. Praise centres on the sight gags, the blend of animation and live action, and a courtroom premise that gives the slapstick a useful target in corporate greed. The reviews also find unexpected warmth in the underdog story and the bond between Wile E. Coyote and his lawyer. For many, the cartoon references support the comedy rather than substitute for it.

The reservations concern how much anarchy survives the move to feature length, with a wide spread between enthusiasm and disappointment. Variety enjoys the cameos but finds the comedy tame beside the original cartoons. Screen Daily is more dismissive, arguing that the screenplay cannot sustain its snarky tone. /Film also sees a missed opportunity for sharper legal satire, finding the approach too child-friendly to make enough of its premise.

Radio Times
20 August 2026 · ★★★★★
100

The critic calls it a pitch-perfect movie with endless gags that masterfully blends courtroom drama, corporate satire, slapstick and bromance, delivering top-drawer laughs and even tears through faithful transposition of cartoon mayhem.

Read the full review →
Empire
13 August 2026 · Olly Richards
90*

The critic calls it a daft, inventive, hilarious comedy that is more than worth the wait after its troubled production history. They single out the deep love for the Looney Tunes world and its many Easter eggs as what makes the film work so well.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 August 2026 · Amy Nicholson
85*

Praises the film's tone-perfect blend of live-action and classic Looney Tunes animation as a brisk, anarchic comedy that nails the spirit of the originals while delivering timely social commentary on corporate greed.

Read the full review →
The Observer
22 August 2026 · Wendy Ide
85*

The critic calls it a giddily inventive blend of madcap Looney Tunes humour, underdog courtroom drama and buddy movie that is one of the funniest of the year. They praise its homage to Who Framed Roger Rabbit and the silly highlights from the Looney Tunes characters.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
17 August 2026 · 4/4/4 · Kambole Campbell
80

The review praises the funny and satisfyingly cartoonish anarchy of this Looney Tunes comedy that sticks it to corporate interests, while noting it revels in Chuck Jones’ cartoon logic despite minor visual issues.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
14 August 2026 · Justin Chang
80*

Hails it as a fleet, funny, elegant throwback with seamless animation-live action integration and reverence for the Looney Tunes universe, while noting a strong metaphorical resonance with the film's own production battles.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Who Framed Roger Rabbit poster

Who Framed Roger Rabbit

1988 · For cartoon chaos, human vulnerability and a mystery that holds together.

The Castle poster

The Castle

1997 · Another legal underdog story whose affection for its people earns the laughs.

A Town Called Panic poster

A Town Called Panic

2009 · For anyone who would happily exchange the courtroom for further animated disorder.

The Wrong Trousers poster

The Wrong Trousers

1993 · Ambitious inventions, precise visual jokes and a villain with excellent timing.

The Devil and Miss Jones poster

The Devil and Miss Jones

1941 · Corporate authority gets a comic examination, with proper affection for the workers.