A child stands with head bowed between two lines of armed soldiers
Film review

First They Killed My Father

2017 · Directed by Angelina Jolie · 2h 16m

In a sentenceAngelina Jolie films the end of the world from a child’s eye level and then, repeatedly, from a drone

Phnom Penh, April 1975. Loung (Sareum Srey Moch), a girl in a comfortable city family, lives with her father Pa (Phoeung Kompheak), a government official, her mother Ma (Sveng Socheata) and six brothers and sisters, among them Kim (Mun Kimhak), Keav (Oun Srey Neang) and the baby, Geak (Sarun Nika). Khmer Rouge soldiers roll into the city to cheering crowds and within hours order everyone out of it. The family joins the columns on the road, leaving everything behind, including their name: Pa tells the children they are peasants now and must never say what he did for a living. Sent to a labour camp, dressed in black and fed on rice water, they try to stay together and unnoticed. The film is in Khmer, from Loung Ung’s memoir.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Angelina Jolie’s account of the Khmer Rouge years, seen through a small girl’s eyes, is serious, tactful and often beautiful to look at. It is also long, and it keeps Loung so quiet that we watch her ordeal more than we share it.

Angelina Jolie’s film is taken from Loung Ung’s memoir of living through the Khmer Rouge years as a small child, and Ung wrote the screenplay with her. It is spoken in Khmer, cast with Cambodian actors, and co-produced by Rithy Panh, whose own films about those years are the standard any newcomer has to meet. Jolie has set herself one rule: we see only what Loung sees, from Loung’s height, and nobody explains to us what nobody explained to her. The rule is honourable and it costs the film a great deal. We admired it for all of its 136 minutes and were moved by it for perhaps thirty.

Anthony Dod Mantle shoots most of it handheld at a child’s eye level, so adults are largely belts and rifles and the frame is forever being jostled from behind. Then, every so often, the camera lifts straight up and we look down on a column of thousands on a road, or a paddy cut into squares, or a camp of thatched huts in rows. These overhead shots are the film’s signature and they are beautiful, which is the trouble with them: from up there the country looks like a garden and the people like a pattern. Tom Brown builds the camps from bamboo and mud and nothing else. Ellen Mirojnick does the one thing the costumes have to do, which is take a family’s coloured city clothes and, over a few scenes, turn them the same black as everyone else’s.

Sareum Srey Moch is on screen as Loung almost without a break. She says little, by design, and she has a face the camera can rest on: round, wary, slow to give anything away. There are moments when something she has seen crosses it and no line is needed. There are more moments when Jolie cuts to her for a reaction, the face stays shut, and we are left to supply the feeling ourselves. Phoeung Kompheak, as Pa, is the one adult we come to know, a soft-spoken man lying for his family’s sake and hating the lie. Sveng Socheata’s Ma is sharper and more frightened and gets about a third of his screen time.

The emptying of Phnom Penh is the stretch that got to us. Jolie and her editors, Patricia Rommel and Xavier Box, let it run: loudspeakers announcing that the Americans are about to bomb, the family carrying what it can, the road filling until it moves like one slow animal, a body in a ditch that Loung looks at and her mother turns her from. At a checkpoint where a soldier asks Pa what he used to do, we were holding our breath, and we have sat through a great many checkpoints. That is the film working as intended: a child’s dread on screen, and the adult knowledge of what is coming supplied by us.

The camp is where it stalls. Digging, rice water, speeches from a cadre (Tharoth Sam) about Angkar and the revolution, children sent away to other camps, more digging. This is faithful, and sameness was the truth of those places, but on screen it is only sameness. Somewhere past the hour we were bored, and ashamed of it, since the people in front of us were dying of the thing we were bored by. Marco Beltrami’s score is spare and respectful, low strings and long silences, and it does nothing to shape the hours; nor do Rommel and Box, who cut the middle of the film at one unvarying pace.

Keeping us inside a child’s head is the choice most critics have divided over, and we come down on both sides of it. It spares us the history lesson, and the film is better than The Killing Fields (1984) at making the terror ordinary, a matter of lists and loudspeakers and a gap where a person used to be. But it leaves Loung’s brothers and sisters as names and faces, and when the film needs us to fear for one of them we realise we were barely introduced. Panh’s The Missing Picture (2013) told the same history with clay figures and a man’s memory and hurt more.

It is a serious film, made with care by people who had every right to make it, and we are glad it exists. Watch it at home with the lights off and the phone in another room, because its effects are quiet and it will not fight for your attention. Bring patience for the middle hour. The last half hour, which we will not describe, repays it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

57
Positive
5
Mixed
8
Negative
5

The reviews split almost evenly between admirers and doubters, with the largest group sitting somewhere in between. Where they agree is on the craft. Most single out Anthony Dod Mantle’s cinematography, the overhead shots and the Cambodian landscapes especially, and several praise Sareum Srey Moch as an expressive, watchable Loung. Several also credit the child’s-eye view with keeping the horrors intimate rather than lurid.

The quarrel is over whether that view works. A sizeable group finds the film impeccably made but emotionally distant: Loung watches, so the audience watches too, and the result is more disturbing than moving. The Los Angeles Times, Vulture and The Ringer land here, The Ringer calling it impersonal and dull. At the other end, The Playlist and Consequence find it moving and humane, Consequence rating it Jolie’s most effective work as a director. The spread is wide, and few of the critics in the middle sound enthusiastic.

The Guardian
12 September 2017 · ★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
80

Bradshaw calls the film an accomplished, artistically assured work that confronts the horror of the Khmer Rouge era. He praises its eerily beautiful overhead cinematography and the way it evokes the psychological effects of terror.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 September 2017 · B · Katie Rife
77

Rife finds the film an accomplished, overly long mood piece that works better as art than as a history lesson. She praises its quiet, child-centered perspective and impressionistic imagery for conveying the Khmer Rouge’s dehumanization.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
14 September 2017 · Robbie Collin
65*

Collin finds the film vivid and lyrical, though ultimately more instructive than moving. He praises the striking images captured by cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. Its praise or criticism of any particular aspect is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 September 2017
64*

The page was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
19 September 2017 · ★★½/4 · Chuck Bowen
62

Bowen finds the film uneven but ultimately stirring, praising Jolie’s increasingly physical, intimate depiction of a child’s survival. He criticizes the early sequences as impersonal and rote.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

How long is First They Killed My Father, and what is it rated?
First They Killed My Father runs 2h 16m. It is a war and drama film.
Where can I watch First They Killed My Father in Poland?
First They Killed My Father is streaming on Netflix in Poland. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
What should I watch after First They Killed My Father?
After First They Killed My Father, try The Killing Fields (1984, Fi1m 82): The same years from the outside, through a journalist and the friend he left behind. Then Grave of the Fireflies (1988, Fi1m 94): Two children, a war, and nobody coming; animated, and harder than most live action; and Come and See (1985, Fi1m 92): A boy in occupied Belarus; the child’s-eye war film with its eyes fully open.

Cast

Awards

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 2018

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Killing Fields (1984, Fi1m 82)The same years from the outside, through a journalist and the friend he left behind.

  2. The Missing Picture (2013) · not reviewed yetRithy Panh rebuilds his own childhood under the Khmer Rouge in clay figures.

  3. Grave of the Fireflies (1988, Fi1m 94)Two children, a war, and nobody coming; animated, and harder than most live action.

  4. Come and See (1985, Fi1m 92)A boy in occupied Belarus; the child’s-eye war film with its eyes fully open.

  5. Beasts of No Nation (2015, Fi1m 72)A boy soldier in an unnamed African war, and the man who makes him one.