Film review

The Killing Fields

1984 · Directed by Roland Joffé · 2h 22m · MPA R

In a sentenceThe actors barely need to speak, which somebody should have told the composer

DramaHistoryWar

Reporter Sydney Schanberg (Sam Waterston) works in Cambodia with Dith Pran (Haing S. Ngor), a guide whose local knowledge helps him cover the war. Their friendship is bound up with the work, as the violence around them brings questions of responsibility and survival. John Malkovich plays Al Rockoff, with Julian Sands as Jon Swain. Directed by Roland Joffé and written by Bruce Robinson, the drama places Schanberg and Pran’s relationship within the Khmer Rouge’s transformation of Cambodia. It follows people trying to report on a conflict while living through it.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Roland Joffé’s Cambodian war drama is harrowing and worth the ordeal, chiefly for Haing S. Ngor’s performance. Bruce Robinson’s script occasionally labours the friendship, while Mike Oldfield’s music presses feelings that the images have already earned.

The Killing Fields is a harrowing war film that earns our attention even when it presses too hard for our tears. Roland Joffé approaches Cambodia’s catastrophe through the friendship of reporter Sydney Schanberg and his guide, Dith Pran. He wants us to understand what violence does to those caught in it, and what one person can reasonably expect from another. Bruce Robinson’s screenplay gives that relationship a great deal of explanatory work to do, though the film is most persuasive when the men are occupied with surviving.

Chris Menges’s cinematography makes the early violence unusually legible, despite the confusion within the scenes. We were horrified by that first hour, because the images let us register the people caught in the violence instead of losing them in a general impression of battle. There is something almost documentary about the camera’s attention to the disorder. The photography gives us enough clarity to understand the danger without making it feel safely organised for the screen.

Haing S. Ngor, as Pran, gives the film its strongest reason to keep watching. His performance has a directness that makes the more emphatic writing around him feel unnecessary; we believe in his fear without needing it explained. Sam Waterston has the harder task of making Schanberg’s part in the friendship feel equally substantial, and his earnestness sometimes comes too close to the script’s own. Both performances are sincere, but Robinson does not always make the bond between the men convincing enough to justify the attention it receives.

Roy Walker’s production design helps make the locations feel inhabited rather than prepared for our inspection. The surroundings remain convincing when the drama becomes more insistent, which matters in a film asking us to believe such extreme suffering. Editor Jim Clark is particularly effective in the wordless passages, giving actions enough time to establish what is at stake. These stretches are gripping because our attention stays on what a person must do next, without dialogue interrupting to explain the difficulty.

Mike Oldfield’s music is much less willing to leave us alone. It bears down on scenes whose distress is already plain, and we occasionally wanted it to stop so that we could attend to the people on screen. A war film is allowed to move us, and Joffé repeatedly does. The score’s insistence nevertheless becomes distracting, particularly beside the restraint that Ngor brings to Pran.

The close attention to the friendship leaves much of Cambodia’s political history unexplained. We would have welcomed more of it, though a drama following two people could not reasonably provide a complete account. Among war films built around friendship, this one distinguishes itself through the sustained attention it gives to fear and endurance. Joffé is prepared to let scenes proceed without dialogue, and those passages give the suffering a force that the more explanatory writing struggles to match.

At 142 minutes, it asks for a sustained evening, and the violence warrants taking its 15 certificate seriously. We recommend it for Ngor and for the passages in which Joffé trusts the camera, the actors and our ability to understand what we are seeing. Leave it for a night when neither of you needs something easy.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics regard The Killing Fields as a forceful, humane account of Cambodia’s suffering, with praise concentrated on its photography, wordless sequences and Haing S. Ngor’s performance as Dith Pran. The reviews repeatedly find the images of violence and devastated landscapes more persuasive than the dialogue. Ngor’s sincerity gives the personal story weight, while the film’s scale and attention to individual survival earn broad respect.

The central friendship produces the sharpest disagreement. RogerEbert.com sees it as a truthful relationship that avoids Hollywood formulas; Variety and The New Yorker find it underdeveloped or manipulated by the script. Other reservations concern a wandering structure, increasing sentimentality and music that presses too hard for a response. The spread runs from wholehearted admiration to qualified approval rather than outright rejection: even the more doubtful reviews credit the film’s visual force, but disagree about how well its writing supports it.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

Few films have captured a nation's agony more dramatically; the film has scale, humanity and emotional force in depicting the Cambodian genocide through personal stories, though the script focuses on the personal over the political and the music is awful. It remains one of the greatest pictures of the 1980s.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
1 January 1984 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film succeeds by respecting its real-life story of friendship and survival rather than following Hollywood formulas, switching focus to Dith Pran's experiences in the second half. It stands out for its human moments, convincing locations, and the sincere performance by non-actor Haing S. Ngor.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
90*

The critic praises Joffé's searing depiction of the Cambodia conflict through the bond between reporter and guide, highlighting the mind-numbing clarity of the camerawork and the unforgettable scene of Pran awakening amid corpses. It is called a mighty accomplishment and possibly the bravest British film yet made.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · GA
75*

The film starts strongly with a chaotic and violent first hour that captures the absurdity of war through stunning photography, but gradually becomes a sentimental buddy movie. Its overall angry, intelligent and compassionate thrust makes it producer Puttnam's finest work to date, despite a misjudged use of Lennon's 'Imagine'.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 January 1984 · Variety Staff
65*

The film is an admirable attempt to convey the horror of recent Cambodian history through perseverance and survival, with gripping silent camp and escape sequences. It works least well as a story of friendship, with something missing at its heart despite impressive trappings and a strong non-professional performance by Haing S. Ngor.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
3 December 1984 · Pauline Kael
60*

The film powerfully depicts the Khmer Rouge's transformation of Cambodia through striking, documentary-like images of horror and landscapes, especially in wordless sequences. It is let down by an inept script that makes the Schanberg-Pran friendship feel inauthentic and manipulative, with filler scenes and overly insistent music.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Silver nugget for the best foreign film, 1986

Won
Silver nugget for the best foreign film

Academy Awards, 1985

Nominated
Best Actor
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Cinematography
Won
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

Missing poster

Missing

1982 · Another political drama in which searching for one person exposes institutional cruelty.

The Battle of Algiers poster93

The Battle of Algiers

1966 · For a harder political focus and an equally convincing sense of place.

No Man's Land poster

No Man's Land

2001 · War’s confusion and official evasions, with bleak humour that offers little comfort.

Quo Vadis, Aida? poster

Quo Vadis, Aida?

2020 · Another interpreter faces impossible responsibilities as civilians depend on promises of protection.

A Taxi Driver poster

A Taxi Driver

2017 · A working partnership draws an ordinary man into witnessing state violence.