Film review

From Dusk Till Dawn

1996 · Directed by Robert Rodriguez · 1h 48m · MPA R

In a sentenceGeorge Clooney looks as though he could organise this bloodbath, if anyone would stop shouting long enough

HorrorActionCrime

Seth Gecko (George Clooney) and his brother Richard (Quentin Tarantino) are bank robbers heading for Mexico. They take hostages, bringing other people into a journey governed by threats and violence. Harvey Keitel plays Jacob Fuller, with Juliette Lewis as Kate Fuller and Ernest Liu as Scott Fuller. Robert Rodriguez directs from a screenplay by Tarantino, following the criminals and their captives through a story that combines crime, action and horror. Salma Hayek Pinault, Cheech Marin and Danny Trejo also appear in the cast.

Fi1m review

George Clooney gives this grubby crime-and-horror mixture enough authority to keep us watching through its excesses. Robert Rodriguez makes the violence inventive, but the second half is less compelling than the hostage-taking that gets us there.

From Dusk Till Dawn is good, grubby entertainment, though its appetite for mayhem eventually gets ahead of its ability to hold our interest. Robert Rodriguez directs Quentin Tarantino’s screenplay as if giving this material respectable manners would be a serious waste of everyone’s time. That confidence carries a great deal of it, especially while the film stays close to its criminals and their hostages. George Clooney plays Seth Gecko, with Tarantino alongside him as his brother Richard.

The brothers are bank robbers heading for Mexico, and taking hostages is part of their route there. Tarantino gives their exchanges enough bite to make spending time with them disturbingly enjoyable, even while other people are being threatened. We caught ourselves liking their company, and it made us uncomfortable. The early crime scenes sustain that awkward feeling because the dialogue is funny without making the men delivering it seem harmless.

Clooney is the main reason this works. He gives Seth authority without asking us to mistake him for a decent man, and makes the dialogue sound like something a person might actually say under pressure. Tarantino is less assured, but Richard’s unpleasantness gives his performance a useful place to put its awkwardness. Clooney also provides some welcome steadiness in a film where the urge to be outrageous can make almost everything feel overemphasised.

Guillermo Navarro photographs the sleaze with enough polish to make its appeal faintly troubling. Cecilia Montiel’s production design helps make this a convincing place for people with no intention of behaving themselves. Those choices work because the early hostage scenes need an ugly atmosphere as well as clever dialogue. The visual pleasure never quite lets us forget what sort of men we are following, which gives the crime material more weight than its jokes might suggest.

The second half takes a turn we will not describe, and Rodriguez handles the change with more assurance than the script quite earns. As his own editor, he gives the action a force and speed that suit the material, keeping the violence inventive long after it has ceased to surprise. Individual sequences offer the pleasure of watching someone solve a complicated practical problem at speed. Graeme Revell’s music helps to sell the mayhem as entertainment, although it adds less personality than the actors do.

The difficulty is that the film grows less interesting as it grows more frantic. Tarantino’s script gives up too much of the early crime drama’s tension, and the later excess cannot entirely replace the pleasure of listening to these people. Some of the gross-out humour feels aimed at an audience still delighted to discover that adults can be offended. Rodriguez’s skill keeps the action watchable, but there are stretches when another burst of violence offers little reason to pay closer attention.

For an exploitation film, giving the audience something to wince at is part of the job, and Rodriguez takes that obligation seriously. The mixture of crime, action and horror is handled with a confidence that makes its unevenness forgivable if these are already genres we enjoy. At 108 minutes, though, it has time to exhaust some of its own jokes. Watch it for Clooney if the genre appeals; he will not make it suitable for the squeamish.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

This splatter-action horror delivers sharp dialogue, excessive violence, great effects, and bad taste with stylish verve as crooks take hostages and face vampires in a sleazy bar. Energetic filmmaking and engaging performances make it a hilarious, raucous gore-fest.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 September 2012 · TCh
80*

The critic recommends going in blind for maximum effect and highlights the film's over-the-top mix of gun-crazy sleaze, macho mayhem, and vampiric strippers. Rodriguez is praised for inventive kills and turning Clooney into a star while giving Tarantino a decent performance.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Salisbury

The critic calls it a rollicking, slam-bang piece of entertainment that fuses guns and vampires for a blood-soaked blast. They single out the fun monster mash and strong performances, especially George Clooney's.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 January 1996

The review describes the film as a film nerd’s fever dream mixing mismatched genres and styles, with the first hour focused on bank-robbing brothers holding hostages and the second delivering frantic bloody mayhem. It praises the craftsmanship of the fight sequences but calls the overall conceit road kill.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
18 January 1996 · David Hunter

The film starts promisingly as a tense crime drama but turns into an overblown, grotesque horror-comedy that fails to deliver. Rodriguez's hyper-kinetic mayhem and excessive gore leave a lasting impression of revulsion rather than substance.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 January 1996

The film is seen as a modestly berserk action picture that delivers expected unnatural disasters with confidence after an entertaining opening, though the second half turns cheesy and derivative of Night of the Living Dead. Rodriguez's wild action sequences and editing nearly redeem the sluggish first half.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Near Dark poster

Near Dark

1987 · Another grubby nocturnal outing whose dangerous company is half the appeal

Assault on Precinct 13 poster

Assault on Precinct 13

1976 · For tense confinement and economical action that makes every threat count

Braindead poster

Braindead

1992 · For those who find elaborate practical gore funnier than anyone reasonably should

A Bittersweet Life poster

A Bittersweet Life

2005 · A more controlled crime film with forceful action and costly loyalties

The Mission poster

The Mission

1999 · For criminals whose professional composure makes the sudden violence more effective