Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix) stands with arms crossed in an empty high-rise office overlooking the city
Film review

Her

2013 · Directed by Spike Jonze · 2h 06m

In a sentenceWe came prepared to pity the man dating his operating system, which was rather presumptuous of us

Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix) is a lonely writer in a near-future Los Angeles. He forms an attachment to Samantha (voiced by Scarlett Johansson), an artificial-intelligence operating system who can talk with him but has no body. Their conversations develop into a romance, giving Theodore a companion whose presence he can hear but never touch. As he becomes involved with Samantha, he has to consider what he wants from a relationship with someone who is not human. Written and directed by Spike Jonze, Her combines romance and science fiction, with Rooney Mara and Chris Pratt also in the cast.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spike Jonze’s unlikely romance is persuasive, funny and worth an evening, chiefly for Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson. Its treatment of loneliness can be too comforting, but the affection between a man and his operating system feels convincing.

Spike Jonze’s Her is a tender, funny romance that gets us to care about a relationship we might have expected to find ridiculous. Joaquin Phoenix plays Theodore, a lonely writer who falls for an operating system called Samantha, voiced by Scarlett Johansson. Jonze gives the attraction enough time to become credible, without treating Theodore as a cautionary example or a fool. The film’s weakness is that it can be too gentle with him, even when his wish for affection deserves a harder look.

Phoenix has to make a great deal happen while his character listens, and he does it without making the listening look strenuous. His vulnerability gives Theodore an appeal that a description of the premise cannot explain. We were moved by the relief he puts into hearing Johansson’s voice; the loneliness is there in how much this contact matters to him. It is a performance that allows the relationship to start from need without making need seem shameful.

Johansson makes Samantha expressive without a face or a body on screen. There is humour and curiosity in the voice, and enough variation to keep the exchanges from becoming a string of reassuring answers. Jonze’s writing gives her a conversational presence that keeps the technological novelty from dominating each exchange. The pleasure is in hearing the two performances find a rhythm together, with neither actor needing to insist that this is unusual.

Hoyte van Hoytema’s photography gives the pastel future a softness that suits the actors’ tentative intimacy. Production designer K.K. Barrett makes this Los Angeles feel habitable, avoiding the suggestion that loneliness needs a visibly ruined city to explain it. The comfort is important: Theodore can have pleasant surroundings and still need someone to talk to. Phoenix makes his unhappiness apparent even when everything around him looks agreeable, so the setting never cancels out the performance.

Editors Eric Zumbrunnen and Jeff Buchanan give the exchanges space, allowing Phoenix’s listening to carry as much weight as the dialogue. That patience is essential to the romance, though at 126 minutes the film spends longer establishing its tenderness than it needs. The music, credited to Richard Reed Parry, Will Butler, Win Butler, Tim Kingsbury, Jeremy Gara and Régine Chassagne, has a similar softness. It stays sympathetic to the voices, but sometimes adds reassurance where less encouragement would have served the scene better.

Jonze sometimes seems too willing to take Theodore’s side. The writing can make the desire to be understood seem sufficient in itself, and the film’s soft look and sound make it easy to settle for that. We wanted a firmer challenge to the attraction of a companion who seems so well suited to him. There are stretches where the romance feels too protected, and the sweetness begins to limit what the film can say about dependence.

As science fiction, Her earns our attention by making Samantha’s lack of a body matter to an otherwise recognisable love story. Jonze takes affection between a human and an artificial intelligence seriously enough to let it be funny, awkward and moving. The familiar romantic questions about attention, companionship and need remain worth asking in this setting. See it for Phoenix and Johansson’s company, and allow time afterwards to disagree about what Theodore has found.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

80
Positive
17
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Her as a funny, tender romance that makes its technological premise emotionally credible. Praise centres on Joaquin Phoenix’s vulnerable performance and Scarlett Johansson’s voice work, which give the relationship between a lonely man and an operating system convincing intimacy. The reviews also value Spike Jonze’s sympathetic direction, the plausible near-future setting and his willingness to explore loneliness and companionship without reducing the story to a warning about technology.

The spread is wide, though reservations come from a small minority and concern sentimentality, self-consciousness and the premise’s limits. Some otherwise enthusiastic reviews find flaws in how the film brings its ideas together. The Independent sees charm but also a conventional love story shaped by male wish-fulfilment. The New Yorker offers the sharpest dissent, finding the sweetness artificial and the account of human connection unconvincing: qualities most critics read as sincere become, here, reasons to distrust the romance.

Little White Lies
14 February 2014 · 3/5/5 · David Jenkins
100

Spike Jonze's best film to date is a whimsical futuro-romance that evolves into hard sci-fi, tracing classic Hollywood love stories into a pastel future. It singles out the film's human and timely take on love, companionship and obsession despite its technological premise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
13 October 2013 · ★★★★/4
100

The review praises the film as remarkable and rich in details about the human condition. It singles out Phoenix's poignant performance and Jonze's sympathetic embrace of the characters' emotions.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
13 October 2013 · A · Eric Kohn
95

The review calls it one of the best studio movies of the year, praising its weird and wonderful technological romance. It highlights Jonze's direction and the film's emotional depth.

Read the full review →
Vulture
9 January 2014 · David Edelstein
90*

The critic calls it one of the best films in years and a love story both daft and amazingly lucid. The evolving relationship and Johansson's voice performance are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
28 July 2014 · David Sexton
85*

The critic calls it a brilliantly reimagined rom-com that is truly touching and outrageously funny. Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson's performances are singled out for making the film work so well.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Jonathan Romney
85*

Jonze's tender, wry film depicts a man falling for an AI operating system voiced by Scarlett Johansson, exploring intimacy and consciousness in a near-future world. The critic praises the performances, especially Phoenix and Johansson, the inventive premise, and the film's elegant, moving take on human-AI relationships without heavy-handed warnings.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Her worth watching?
Her is worth watching for anyone open to a romance between a lonely man and his operating system, and we scored it 84. Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johansson make the attraction credible, funny and moving. It is too gentle with Theodore's need for comfort and runs longer than it should, so expect tenderness rather than a hard look at dependence.
How long is Her, and what is it rated?
Her runs 2h 06m. It is a romance and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Her in Romania?
Her is streaming on HBO Max in Romania. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Her, and is it suitable for children?
Her carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not for children, but it is a quiet romance rather than a violent or frightening film. Our review notes nothing that would alarm the squeamish; the certificate implies adult themes and language rather than blood or scares. Older teenagers who can sit with a slow, talkative love story should be fine.
How does Her compare to Brief Encounter?
Her and Brief Encounter are both romances built on listening, restraint and need that goes unspoken, though one pairs a man with a bodiless voice and the other two married strangers in a railway station. David Lean's film is the finer of the two, harder and more frightening about love. Choose Her for warmth and humour, Brief Encounter for ache.
What should I watch after Her?
After Her, try The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75): Two lonely people become close through words, with mistaken deliveries doing the matchmaking. Then Brief Encounter (1945, Fi1m 90): For another romance that makes listening, restraint and unspoken need matter.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2014

Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Production Design
Won
Best Writing, Original Screenplay

People's Choice Award for Favorite Movie Actress, 2014

Nominated
People's Choice Award for Favorite Movie Actress

Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture, 2014

Nominated
Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture

Saturn Awards, 2014

Won
Best Fantasy Film

Writers Guild of America Award for Best Original Screenplay, 2014

Won
Writers Guild of America Award for Best Original Screenplay

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Art Direction, 2013

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Art Direction

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Composer, 2013

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Composer

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Film, 2013

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Film

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actress, 2013

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Supporting Actress

Critics' Choice Awards, 2013

Nominated
Best Director
Won
Best Original and Adapted Screenplay

Golden Globes, 2013

Nominated
Best Actor – Motion Picture Musical or Comedy
Nominated
Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy
Won
Best Screenplay

National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Film, 2013

Nominated
National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Film

Satellite Award for Best Original Score, 2013

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Original Score

Satellite Award for Best Original Screenplay, 2013

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Original Screenplay

If you liked this, try…

  1. Electric Dreams (1984) · not reviewed yetA computer complicates a romance, with more mischief and considerably less restraint.

  2. After Yang (2021) · not reviewed yetAnother household learns how much feeling can attach to an artificial companion.

  3. The Lunchbox (2013, Fi1m 75)Two lonely people become close through words, with mistaken deliveries doing the matchmaking.

  4. Brief Encounter (1945, Fi1m 90)For another romance that makes listening, restraint and unspoken need matter.

  5. I'm Your Man (2021) · not reviewed yetA more sceptical German comedy about the appeal of a perfectly accommodating partner.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever